Delovanje nabavnih konzorcijev - primerjava Slovenije, Finske in Islandije

• Main Author: Katalenić, Matko
• Other Authors: Južnič, Primož
• Format: Master Thesis
• Language: Slovenian
• Published: M. Katalenić 2019
• Subjects: konzorciji; nabavni konzorciji; Slovenija; Finska; Islandija; konzorcij CTK; consortia; purchasing consortia; info:eu-repo/classification/udc/061.23:026/027(043.2); Morali; Iceland
• Online Access: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=107664; https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=118542&dn=; https://plus.si.cobiss.net/opac7/bib/68565346?lang=sl

Nabavni konzorciji so najbolj razširjena oblika nabave elektronskih gradiv v knjižnicah, predvsem zaradi številnih prednosti, ki jih ponujajo v primerjavi s klasično nabavo. V raziskavi smo primerjali konzorcije iz Islandije, Finske in Slovenije. Islandija in Finska imata nacionalno centraliziran nabavni tip konzorcija, konzorcij CTK iz Slovenije pa spada med decentralizirane. Ugotovili smo, da imata finski in islandski konzorcij večje obratovalne stroške, stabilnejše število članov in večje število zaposlenih kot konzorcij CTK. Konzorcij CTK ima v primerjavi z nordijskima konzorcijema zelo nizke obratovalne stroške in je v povprečju dosegal višjo rast pri proračunu za nabavo. Ugotovili smo, da se obravnavani konzorciji med seboj precej razlikujejo in da bi morali našo raziskavo dopolniti, če bi hoteli priti do poglobljenih zaključkov. Purchasing consortia is a widespread way for libraries looking to purchase electronic journals and other sources because of many advantages when compared to the classic purchasing models. In our study, we compared consortia from Iceland, Finnland and Slovenia. Iceland and Finland have national-centralised purchasing consortia, the CTK consortium from Slovenia belongs to the decentralised type. Our findings suggest that Finnish and Icelandic consortia have higher operating costs, a more stable number of members and more employees than CTK consortium. Compared to nordic consortia, CTK consortium has significantly lower operating costs and on average has had the highest growth of purchasing funds. In order to reach more conclusive findings, the research method would need to be improved as there are significant differences between the mentioned consortia.