Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation

Facilitation (enhancement of propagule retention in this case) is increasingly recognized as an important driver of biodiversity, but it is still unknown if facilitation during dispersal and colonization is affected by self-organized spatial pattern formation. We investigated the ability of in-strea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic Sciences
Main Authors: Cornacchia, Loreta, van der Wal, Daphne, van de Koppel, Johan, Puijalon, Sara, Wharton, Geraldene, Bouma, Tjeerd J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11370/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/75444899/Cornacchia2019_Article_Flow_divergenceFeedbacksContro.pdf
id ftunigroningenpu:oai:pure.rug.nl:publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunigroningenpu:oai:pure.rug.nl:publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9 2024-06-23T07:53:27+00:00 Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation Cornacchia, Loreta van der Wal, Daphne van de Koppel, Johan Puijalon, Sara Wharton, Geraldene Bouma, Tjeerd J. 2019-01 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11370/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9 https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1 https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/75444899/Cornacchia2019_Article_Flow_divergenceFeedbacksContro.pdf eng eng https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Cornacchia , L , van der Wal , D , van de Koppel , J , Puijalon , S , Wharton , G & Bouma , T J 2019 , ' Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation : The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation ' , Aquatic sciences , vol. 81 , no. 1 , 17 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1 Aquatic macrophytes Bio-physical feedbacks Stress divergence Establishment Flume tank Hydrochory LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS POSITIVE INTERACTIONS SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES EMERGENT MACROPHYTE SPARGANIUM-ERECTUM CURRENT VELOCITY WATER DISPERSAL PLANT FRAGMENTS SEDIMENT article 2019 ftunigroningenpu https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1 2024-06-10T16:41:02Z Facilitation (enhancement of propagule retention in this case) is increasingly recognized as an important driver of biodiversity, but it is still unknown if facilitation during dispersal and colonization is affected by self-organized spatial pattern formation. We investigated the ability of in-stream submerged macrophyte patches to trap the vegetative propagules of three species (Berula erecta, Groenlandia densa, Elodea nuttallii in two size classes: 13-22 and 40-48cm long), and to potentially benefit the colonization of these three species. We tested the effects of propagule traits, hydrodynamic forcing, and spatial patch configuration on propagule trapping. Propagule buoyancy was negatively correlated with trapping chance, while propagule size did not influence trapping. Species-specific differences in buoyancy were maintained for weeks after fragmentation. Propagule retention was interactive and conditional upon the interplay between incoming flow velocities and vegetation spatial patterning. In the flume experiment at low flows, a patchy configuration (one patch filling 66% of the flume width) retained more surface-drifting propagules (B. erecta, G. densa), than near-homogeneous cover (two patches close together, filling the entire flume width). In contrast, retention of sinking E. nuttallii propagules increased in the two-patch configurations. In flume and field releases where patches did not completely fill the channel width, water flowed around the patches rather than over or through them. This resulted in low-flow velocity areas within patches where canopies were upright and propagules were retained, and higher velocity flows around patches. In contrast, when vegetation filled the channel width, water could not be diverted laterally around the patches and preferentially flowed over them, causing the canopies to bend and reduce their trapping capacity. In flume experiments at high flows, retention of all species decreased, regardless of vegetation configuration, as propagules passed over the reconfigured ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Groenlandia University of Groningen research database Aquatic Sciences 81 1
institution Open Polar
collection University of Groningen research database
op_collection_id ftunigroningenpu
language English
topic Aquatic macrophytes
Bio-physical feedbacks
Stress divergence
Establishment
Flume tank
Hydrochory
LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS
POSITIVE INTERACTIONS
SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES
EMERGENT MACROPHYTE
SPARGANIUM-ERECTUM
CURRENT VELOCITY
WATER DISPERSAL
PLANT FRAGMENTS
SEDIMENT
spellingShingle Aquatic macrophytes
Bio-physical feedbacks
Stress divergence
Establishment
Flume tank
Hydrochory
LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS
POSITIVE INTERACTIONS
SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES
EMERGENT MACROPHYTE
SPARGANIUM-ERECTUM
CURRENT VELOCITY
WATER DISPERSAL
PLANT FRAGMENTS
SEDIMENT
Cornacchia, Loreta
van der Wal, Daphne
van de Koppel, Johan
Puijalon, Sara
Wharton, Geraldene
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
topic_facet Aquatic macrophytes
Bio-physical feedbacks
Stress divergence
Establishment
Flume tank
Hydrochory
LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS
POSITIVE INTERACTIONS
SUBMERGED MACROPHYTES
EMERGENT MACROPHYTE
SPARGANIUM-ERECTUM
CURRENT VELOCITY
WATER DISPERSAL
PLANT FRAGMENTS
SEDIMENT
description Facilitation (enhancement of propagule retention in this case) is increasingly recognized as an important driver of biodiversity, but it is still unknown if facilitation during dispersal and colonization is affected by self-organized spatial pattern formation. We investigated the ability of in-stream submerged macrophyte patches to trap the vegetative propagules of three species (Berula erecta, Groenlandia densa, Elodea nuttallii in two size classes: 13-22 and 40-48cm long), and to potentially benefit the colonization of these three species. We tested the effects of propagule traits, hydrodynamic forcing, and spatial patch configuration on propagule trapping. Propagule buoyancy was negatively correlated with trapping chance, while propagule size did not influence trapping. Species-specific differences in buoyancy were maintained for weeks after fragmentation. Propagule retention was interactive and conditional upon the interplay between incoming flow velocities and vegetation spatial patterning. In the flume experiment at low flows, a patchy configuration (one patch filling 66% of the flume width) retained more surface-drifting propagules (B. erecta, G. densa), than near-homogeneous cover (two patches close together, filling the entire flume width). In contrast, retention of sinking E. nuttallii propagules increased in the two-patch configurations. In flume and field releases where patches did not completely fill the channel width, water flowed around the patches rather than over or through them. This resulted in low-flow velocity areas within patches where canopies were upright and propagules were retained, and higher velocity flows around patches. In contrast, when vegetation filled the channel width, water could not be diverted laterally around the patches and preferentially flowed over them, causing the canopies to bend and reduce their trapping capacity. In flume experiments at high flows, retention of all species decreased, regardless of vegetation configuration, as propagules passed over the reconfigured ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cornacchia, Loreta
van der Wal, Daphne
van de Koppel, Johan
Puijalon, Sara
Wharton, Geraldene
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
author_facet Cornacchia, Loreta
van der Wal, Daphne
van de Koppel, Johan
Puijalon, Sara
Wharton, Geraldene
Bouma, Tjeerd J.
author_sort Cornacchia, Loreta
title Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
title_short Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
title_full Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
title_fullStr Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
title_full_unstemmed Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
title_sort flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation:the importance of spatial patterns for facilitation
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/11370/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/75444899/Cornacchia2019_Article_Flow_divergenceFeedbacksContro.pdf
genre Groenlandia
genre_facet Groenlandia
op_source Cornacchia , L , van der Wal , D , van de Koppel , J , Puijalon , S , Wharton , G & Bouma , T J 2019 , ' Flow-divergence feedbacks control propagule retention by in-stream vegetation : The importance of spatial patterns for facilitation ' , Aquatic sciences , vol. 81 , no. 1 , 17 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1
op_relation https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/821378e9-e391-4d75-93e5-cd534bead0b9
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-018-0612-1
container_title Aquatic Sciences
container_volume 81
container_issue 1
_version_ 1802645095341621248