On Inuit and Judicial protection in a shared legal order
A recent decision of the General Court of the European Union (Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v EP and Council, Order of 6 September 2011) illustrates once again the limited options available to NGOs wishing to contest a decision of the European institutions before the courts. This p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/811dec9b-a165-4464-b193-ec1933f734ce https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/811dec9b-a165-4464-b193-ec1933f734ce https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/10530365/EELR2012016.pdf |
Summary: | A recent decision of the General Court of the European Union (Case T-18/10 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and Others v EP and Council, Order of 6 September 2011) illustrates once again the limited options available to NGOs wishing to contest a decision of the European institutions before the courts. This paper deals with the first case law of the General Court on access to justice ex Article 263 TFEU in the post-Lissabon wording of that provision. |
---|