Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development

Understanding ecological consequences of avian developmental modes requires knowledge of energy requirements of chicks of different positions in the prococialaltricial spectrum, but those have rarely boon measured in birds with self-feeding precocial young. We studied prefledging energy budgets in c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Schekkerman, H, Visser, GH
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2001
Subjects:
Dee
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11370/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/67091180/0004_8038_282001_29118_5B0944_3Aperise_5D2.0.co_3B2.pdf
id ftunigroningenpu:oai:pure.rug.nl:publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunigroningenpu:oai:pure.rug.nl:publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9 2024-06-02T08:14:57+00:00 Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development Schekkerman, H Visser, GH 2001-10 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11370/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9 https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9 https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2 https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/67091180/0004_8038_282001_29118_5B0944_3Aperise_5D2.0.co_3B2.pdf eng eng https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Schekkerman , H & Visser , GH 2001 , ' Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds : Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development ' , The Auk , vol. 118 , no. 4 , pp. 944-957 . https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2 DOUBLY LABELED WATER TEMPERATURE REGULATION STERNA-PARADISAEA TIME BUDGETS TERN CHICKS GROWTH-RATE BIRDS EXPENDITURE ECOLOGY article 2001 ftunigroningenpu https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2 2024-05-07T17:46:31Z Understanding ecological consequences of avian developmental modes requires knowledge of energy requirements of chicks of different positions in the prococialaltricial spectrum, but those have rarely boon measured in birds with self-feeding precocial young. We studied prefledging energy budgets in chicks of Black-tailed God vit (Limosa limosa) and Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) in the field and in the laboratory. Lapwings show slower growth than godwits, reaching a 29% lower fledging mass (142 vs. 201 g) in a 32% longer period (33 vs. 25 days). Daily energy expenditure (DEE), measured by the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique, and daily metabolized energy (DEE plus energy deposited into tissue) increased proportionally to body mass at similar levels in both species. Total metabolized energy (TME) over the fledging period was 8,331 kJ in godwits and 6,982 kJ in lapwings, 39 and 29% higher than an allometric prediction ( Weathers 1992). That suggests that self-feeding precocial chicks have high energy requirements compared with parent-fed species, due to costs of activity and thermoregulation associated with foraging. Those components made up 50-53% of TME in the shorebirds, more than twice as much as in seven parent-fed species for which DLW-bascd energy budgets are available. In captive lapwings and godwits growing up under favorable thermal conditions with food readily accessible, thermoregulation and activity costs were 53-58% lower and TME was 26-31% lower than in free-living chicks. The proportion of TME allocated to tissue formation (13-15% deposited as tissue plus 10-12% synthesis costs) was low in the shorebirds, and reductions in food intake may therefore sooner lead to stagnation of growth than in parent-fed chicks. Furthermore, the need to forage limits potential for saving energy by reducing activity in periods of food scarcity, because that will further decrease food intake. Self-feeding precocial chicks thus seem to operate within fairly narrow energetic margins. At the same time, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Sterna paradisaea Vanellus vanellus Limosa limosa University of Groningen research database Dee ENVELOPE(-59.767,-59.767,-62.433,-62.433)
institution Open Polar
collection University of Groningen research database
op_collection_id ftunigroningenpu
language English
topic DOUBLY LABELED WATER
TEMPERATURE REGULATION
STERNA-PARADISAEA
TIME BUDGETS
TERN CHICKS
GROWTH-RATE
BIRDS
EXPENDITURE
ECOLOGY
spellingShingle DOUBLY LABELED WATER
TEMPERATURE REGULATION
STERNA-PARADISAEA
TIME BUDGETS
TERN CHICKS
GROWTH-RATE
BIRDS
EXPENDITURE
ECOLOGY
Schekkerman, H
Visser, GH
Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
topic_facet DOUBLY LABELED WATER
TEMPERATURE REGULATION
STERNA-PARADISAEA
TIME BUDGETS
TERN CHICKS
GROWTH-RATE
BIRDS
EXPENDITURE
ECOLOGY
description Understanding ecological consequences of avian developmental modes requires knowledge of energy requirements of chicks of different positions in the prococialaltricial spectrum, but those have rarely boon measured in birds with self-feeding precocial young. We studied prefledging energy budgets in chicks of Black-tailed God vit (Limosa limosa) and Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus) in the field and in the laboratory. Lapwings show slower growth than godwits, reaching a 29% lower fledging mass (142 vs. 201 g) in a 32% longer period (33 vs. 25 days). Daily energy expenditure (DEE), measured by the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique, and daily metabolized energy (DEE plus energy deposited into tissue) increased proportionally to body mass at similar levels in both species. Total metabolized energy (TME) over the fledging period was 8,331 kJ in godwits and 6,982 kJ in lapwings, 39 and 29% higher than an allometric prediction ( Weathers 1992). That suggests that self-feeding precocial chicks have high energy requirements compared with parent-fed species, due to costs of activity and thermoregulation associated with foraging. Those components made up 50-53% of TME in the shorebirds, more than twice as much as in seven parent-fed species for which DLW-bascd energy budgets are available. In captive lapwings and godwits growing up under favorable thermal conditions with food readily accessible, thermoregulation and activity costs were 53-58% lower and TME was 26-31% lower than in free-living chicks. The proportion of TME allocated to tissue formation (13-15% deposited as tissue plus 10-12% synthesis costs) was low in the shorebirds, and reductions in food intake may therefore sooner lead to stagnation of growth than in parent-fed chicks. Furthermore, the need to forage limits potential for saving energy by reducing activity in periods of food scarcity, because that will further decrease food intake. Self-feeding precocial chicks thus seem to operate within fairly narrow energetic margins. At the same time, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Schekkerman, H
Visser, GH
author_facet Schekkerman, H
Visser, GH
author_sort Schekkerman, H
title Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
title_short Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
title_full Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
title_fullStr Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
title_full_unstemmed Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
title_sort prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds:energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development
publishDate 2001
url https://hdl.handle.net/11370/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2
https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/67091180/0004_8038_282001_29118_5B0944_3Aperise_5D2.0.co_3B2.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-59.767,-59.767,-62.433,-62.433)
geographic Dee
geographic_facet Dee
genre Sterna paradisaea
Vanellus vanellus
Limosa limosa
genre_facet Sterna paradisaea
Vanellus vanellus
Limosa limosa
op_source Schekkerman , H & Visser , GH 2001 , ' Prefledging energy requirements in shorebirds : Energetic implications of self-feeding precocial development ' , The Auk , vol. 118 , no. 4 , pp. 944-957 . https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2
op_relation https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/5a140a46-7165-4e5b-a53d-2318709492e9
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2001)118[0944:perise]2.0.co;2
_version_ 1800738973015867392