Comparison between observed and simulated aeolian snow mass fluxes in Adélie Land, East Antarctica

• Published in: The Cryosphere
• Main Authors: Amory, C, Trouvilliez, A, Gallée, H, Favier, V, Naaim-Bouvet, F., Genthon, C, Agosta, C, Piard, L, Bellot, H
• Other Authors: Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA), Laboratoire de glaciologie et géophysique de l'environnement (LGGE), Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB Université de Savoie Université de Chambéry )-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP )-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB Université de Savoie Université de Chambéry )-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Grenoble Alpes 2016-2019 (UGA 2016-2019 ), Université de Liège, Centre d'Etudes et d'Expertise sur les Risques, l'Environnement, la Mobilité et l'Aménagement - Direction Centre-Est (Cerema Direction Centre-Est), Centre d'Etudes et d'Expertise sur les Risques, l'Environnement, la Mobilité et l'Aménagement (Cerema)
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: HAL CCSD 2015
• Subjects: ADELIE; ANTARCTIQUE; [SDE]Environmental Sciences; East Antarctica; Nash; Antarc*; Antarctica; Antarctique*; The Cryosphere; The Cryosphere Discussions
• Online Access: https://insu.hal.science/insu-01275298; https://insu.hal.science/insu-01275298/document; https://insu.hal.science/insu-01275298/file/THE%20CRYOSPHERE%20-%20Comparison%20between%20observed%20and%20simulated%20aeolian%20snow%20mass%20fluxes%20in%20Ad%C3%A9lie%20Land%20East%20Antarctica.pdf; https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1373-2015

[Departement_IRSTEA]Eaux [TR1_IRSTEA]RIVAGE International audience Using the original setup described in Gallée et al. (2013), the MAR regional climate model including a coupled snowpack/aeolian snow transport parameterization, was run at a fine spatial (5 km horizontal and 2 m vertical) resolution over 1 summer month in coastal Adélie Land. Different types of feedback were taken into account in MAR including drag partitioning caused by surface roughness elements. Model outputs are compared with observations made at two coastal locations, D17 and D47, situated respectively 10 and 100 km inland. Wind speed was correctly simulated with positive values of the Nash test (0.60 for D17 and 0.37 for D47) but wind velocities above 10 m s −1 were underestimated at both D17 and D47; at D47, the model consistently underestimated wind velocity by 2 m s −1. Aeolian snow transport events were correctly reproduced with the right timing and a good temporal resolution at both locations except when the maximum particle height was less than 1 m. The threshold friction velocity, evaluated only at D17 for a 7-day period without snowfall, was overestimated. The simulated aeolian snow mass fluxes between 0 and 2 m at D47 displayed the same variations but were underestimated compared to the second-generation FlowCapt ™ values, as was the simulated relative humidity at 2 m above the surface. As a result, MAR underestimated the total aeolian horizontal snow transport for the first 2 m above the ground by a factor of 10 compared to estimations by the second-generation FlowCapt ™. The simulation was significantly improved at D47 if a 1-order decrease in the magnitude of z 0 was accounted for, but agreement with observations was reduced at D17. Our results suggest that z 0 may vary regionally depending on snowpack properties, which are involved in different types of feedback between aeolian transport of snow and z 0 .