Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science
Pre-roost murmuration displays by European starlings Sturnus vulgaris are a spectacular example of collective animal behaviour. To date, empirical research has focussed largely on flock movement and biomechanics whereas research on possible causal mechanisms that affect flock size and murmuration du...
Published in: | PLOS ONE |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PLoS
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/ https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/1/Birds%20of%20a%20feather%20flock%20together.pdf https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 |
id |
ftunigloucesters:oai::4726 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftunigloucesters:oai::4726 2023-05-15T16:10:01+02:00 Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science Goodenough, Anne E Little, Natasha Carpenter, William S Hart, Adam G 2017-06-19 text https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/ https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/1/Birds%20of%20a%20feather%20flock%20together.pdf https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 en eng PLoS https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/1/Birds%20of%20a%20feather%20flock%20together.pdf Goodenough, Anne E orcid:0000-0002-7662-6670 , Little, Natasha, Carpenter, William S and Hart, Adam G orcid:0000-0002-4795-9986 (2017) Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science. PLoS ONE, 12 (6). pp. 1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277> doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 cc_by_4 CC-BY QL671-699 Birds Article PeerReviewed 2017 ftunigloucesters https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 2022-03-16T20:01:54Z Pre-roost murmuration displays by European starlings Sturnus vulgaris are a spectacular example of collective animal behaviour. To date, empirical research has focussed largely on flock movement and biomechanics whereas research on possible causal mechanisms that affect flock size and murmuration duration has been limited and restricted to a small number of sites. Possible explanations for this behaviour include reducing predation through the dilution, detection or predator confusion effects (the “safer together” hypotheses) or recruiting more birds to create larger (warmer) roosts (the “warmer together” hypothesis). We collected data on size, duration, habitat, temperature and predators from >3,000 murmurations using citizen science. Sightings were submitted from 23 countries but UK records predominated. Murmurations occurred across a range of habitats but there was no association between habitat and size/duration. Size increased significantly from October to early February, followed by a decrease until the end of the season in March (overall mean 30,082 birds; maximum 750,000 birds). Mean duration was 26 minutes (± 44 seconds SEM). Displays were longest at the start/end of the season, probably due to a significant positive relationship with day length. Birds of prey were recorded at 29.6% of murmurations. The presence of predators including harrier Circus, peregrine Falco peregrinus, and sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus was positively correlated with murmuration size (R^2 = 0.401) and duration (R^2 = 0.258), especially when these species were flying near to, or actively engaging with, starlings. Temperature was negatively correlated with duration but the effect was much weaker than that of day length. When predators were present, murmurations were statistically more likely to end with all birds going down en masse to roost rather than dispersing from the site. Our findings suggest that starling murmurations are primarily an anti-predator adaptation rather than being undertaken to attract larger numbers of individuals to increase roost warmth. Article in Journal/Newspaper Falco peregrinus University of Gloucestershire: Research Repository PLOS ONE 12 6 e0179277 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Gloucestershire: Research Repository |
op_collection_id |
ftunigloucesters |
language |
English |
topic |
QL671-699 Birds |
spellingShingle |
QL671-699 Birds Goodenough, Anne E Little, Natasha Carpenter, William S Hart, Adam G Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
topic_facet |
QL671-699 Birds |
description |
Pre-roost murmuration displays by European starlings Sturnus vulgaris are a spectacular example of collective animal behaviour. To date, empirical research has focussed largely on flock movement and biomechanics whereas research on possible causal mechanisms that affect flock size and murmuration duration has been limited and restricted to a small number of sites. Possible explanations for this behaviour include reducing predation through the dilution, detection or predator confusion effects (the “safer together” hypotheses) or recruiting more birds to create larger (warmer) roosts (the “warmer together” hypothesis). We collected data on size, duration, habitat, temperature and predators from >3,000 murmurations using citizen science. Sightings were submitted from 23 countries but UK records predominated. Murmurations occurred across a range of habitats but there was no association between habitat and size/duration. Size increased significantly from October to early February, followed by a decrease until the end of the season in March (overall mean 30,082 birds; maximum 750,000 birds). Mean duration was 26 minutes (± 44 seconds SEM). Displays were longest at the start/end of the season, probably due to a significant positive relationship with day length. Birds of prey were recorded at 29.6% of murmurations. The presence of predators including harrier Circus, peregrine Falco peregrinus, and sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus was positively correlated with murmuration size (R^2 = 0.401) and duration (R^2 = 0.258), especially when these species were flying near to, or actively engaging with, starlings. Temperature was negatively correlated with duration but the effect was much weaker than that of day length. When predators were present, murmurations were statistically more likely to end with all birds going down en masse to roost rather than dispersing from the site. Our findings suggest that starling murmurations are primarily an anti-predator adaptation rather than being undertaken to attract larger numbers of individuals to increase roost warmth. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Goodenough, Anne E Little, Natasha Carpenter, William S Hart, Adam G |
author_facet |
Goodenough, Anne E Little, Natasha Carpenter, William S Hart, Adam G |
author_sort |
Goodenough, Anne E |
title |
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
title_short |
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
title_full |
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
title_fullStr |
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
title_full_unstemmed |
Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
title_sort |
birds of a feather flock together: insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science |
publisher |
PLoS |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/ https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/1/Birds%20of%20a%20feather%20flock%20together.pdf https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 |
genre |
Falco peregrinus |
genre_facet |
Falco peregrinus |
op_relation |
https://eprints.glos.ac.uk/4726/1/Birds%20of%20a%20feather%20flock%20together.pdf Goodenough, Anne E orcid:0000-0002-7662-6670 , Little, Natasha, Carpenter, William S and Hart, Adam G orcid:0000-0002-4795-9986 (2017) Birds of a feather flock together: Insights into starling murmuration behaviour revealed using citizen science. PLoS ONE, 12 (6). pp. 1-18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277> doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 |
op_rights |
cc_by_4 |
op_rightsnorm |
CC-BY |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179277 |
container_title |
PLOS ONE |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
6 |
container_start_page |
e0179277 |
_version_ |
1765995268454481920 |