VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development

VIDEO: 10:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. SESSION 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development Moderator: Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center Speakers/Panelists: Randy Udall, Co‐founder, Association for the Study of Peak Oil‐USA Jim Bartis, Senior Policy Researcher, Rand Corporation Gl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Bartis, Jim, Vawter, Glenn, Udall, Randy
Format:	Text
Language:	unknown
Published:	Colorado Law Scholarly Commons 2010
Subjects:	oil shale development oil shale costs benefits Rand Corporation prospects strategic significance domestic oil shale industry critical policy issues U.S. energy big picture oil production global liquids production million barrels per day liquids consumption imports problems with oil expensive insecure supplies environmental damage greenhouse gases GHGs limited alternatives biomass climate-friendly efficiency electrification oil shortage shortage of crude oil Frank Knox Peak Oil COAS crude oil anxiety syndrome global production of conventional oil extraction costs technology advances Colorado Green River Formation largest deposits in the world high recoverable estimates U.S. demand barrels per day bpd development timeline development stage R&D research and development facility size total production pilot plant scale-up commercial operations economic gains lower oil prices new jobs geopolitical benefits economic profits employment benefits federal government state government local government lease bonus payments royalties corporate income taxes shale oil jobs U.S. consumers national security increased supplies oil-exporting countries U.S. interests weapons munitions manufacture terrorist organizations portfolio of measures technical issues environmental issues governance issues environmental impacts socioeconomic impacts land use ecological impacts air quality climate change CO2 emissions water quality Colorado River drainage basin leaching of salts and toxics public services pioneer facility spent shale market risks federal lands leasing BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management water consumption Colorado River Basin incentives for pioneering firms royalty payments tax incentives public interest higher royalty payments intensive development reliable information multidimensional oversight port authority approach mining surface retorting large-scale testing in-situ conversion groundwater contamination oil shale industry National Oil Shale Association NOSA huge resource sustainable development economically feasible technology RD&D Research Development and Demonstration misconceptions Black Sunday environmental mitigation strategies inferior hydrocarbon resource federal leasing social impacts federal government funding federal production mandates stricter regulations in situ technologies Piceance Basin need for federal resources commercialization of surface technologies private research industry investments long term profit potential conventional petroleum oil shale technologies technical risk investment risk domestic resource offshore political risk economically viable small commercial operations BLM leases 10-year leases state requirements hydro data development plan permit approvals reclamation bonding AMSO American Shale Oil Corporation conventional oil and gas cost estimates 1970s improving economic return reducing investment risk costs of shale oil production project maturation demonstration plants public benefits technical parameters Unocal plant Battlement Mesa revenues taxes fees jobs infrastructure improvements long lived industry oil supply security decrease gasoline prices obstacles regional opposition carbon management water issues air issues technical solutions regulatory obstacles wildlife social benefits Estonian Oil Shale Plant petroleum transportation system liquid fuels transportation fuels oil importation costs and benefits cost-benefit analysis jet fuel gasoline diesel oil shale projects Shell Chevron Total Exxon OSEC EcoShale Paraho Enshale Enshale Pilot Plant Utah Shell Mahogany Project Freeze Wall Schlumberger AuraSource Quasar Energy LLC Percy Kean Clean Technologies IEP Independent Energy Partners Mountain West Energy PetroProbe University of Denver Phoenix-Wyoming Natural Resources Recovery Millennium Synfuels Chattanooga Corporation CRE Energy Global Resources Natural Soda/Sentient General Synfuels International ConocoPhillips Encana Anadarko The Elusive Bonanza Yankee ingenuity chasing a mirage hype U.S. Department of Energy DoE Colorado oil shale follies oil riches Denver Post Paul Foy rising crude oil prices Canadian tar sands ethanol GTL gas to liquid CTL coal to liquid production of oil shale metric tons Estonia deposit Russia Leningrad deposit Kashpir deposit United Kingdom UK Scotland Lothians Brazil Irati Formation China Maoming deposit Fushun deposit Germany Dotternhausen Sub-salt Tupi well costs petroleum quality conventional unconventional API gravity permeability Prudhoe Bay North Dakota kerogen tons barrels immature source rock plankton sediment black shale sapropelic coal energy content fuels natural gas crude oil coal cattle manure firewood municipal trash baked potatoes BTU/ton British Thermal Units energy Oil & Gas Journal nuclear energy in-situ electricity energy return Greenpeace carbon budget energy alternatives global carbon emissions fossil fuels Red Leaf Resources Ecoshale Process in-capsule process low water use Electrofrac hydraulic fracture fracking fracing hydraulic fracturing electrically conductive conductive heating production wells injection well extraction well U.S. oil production OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries FSU Former Soviet Union energy transition oil consumption remaining oil conventional oil tar sands bitumen coal liquids regional coals Colorado Coal Quality Data resource quality unconventionals Administrative Law Climate Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Environmental Health and Protection Environmental Law Environmental Policy Geotechnical Engineering Land Use Law Natural Resource Economics Natural Resources Law Natural Resources Management and Policy Oil Gas and Energy and Mineral Law President/Executive Department Public Policy Science and Technology Law State and Local Government Law Water Law Water Resource Management Bonanza Knox Peak Nosa Percy Yankee
Online Access:	https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development/3 https://youtu.be/6Omb1SZ_t-4

id	ftunicolboulawl:oai:scholar.law.colorado.edu:promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development-1015
record_format	openpolar
institution	Open Polar
collection	University of Colorado Boulder, Law School: Scholarly Commons
op_collection_id	ftunicolboulawl
language	unknown
topic	oil shale development oil shale costs benefits Rand Corporation prospects strategic significance domestic oil shale industry critical policy issues U.S. energy big picture oil production global liquids production million barrels per day liquids consumption imports problems with oil expensive insecure supplies environmental damage greenhouse gases GHGs limited alternatives biomass climate-friendly efficiency electrification oil shortage shortage of crude oil Frank Knox Peak Oil COAS crude oil anxiety syndrome global production of conventional oil extraction costs technology advances Colorado Green River Formation largest deposits in the world high recoverable estimates U.S. demand barrels per day bpd development timeline development stage R&D research and development facility size total production pilot plant scale-up commercial operations economic gains lower oil prices new jobs geopolitical benefits economic profits employment benefits federal government state government local government lease bonus payments royalties corporate income taxes shale oil jobs U.S. consumers national security increased supplies oil-exporting countries U.S. interests weapons munitions manufacture terrorist organizations portfolio of measures technical issues environmental issues governance issues environmental impacts socioeconomic impacts land use ecological impacts air quality climate change CO2 emissions water quality Colorado River drainage basin leaching of salts and toxics public services pioneer facility spent shale market risks federal lands leasing BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management water consumption Colorado River Basin incentives for pioneering firms royalty payments tax incentives public interest higher royalty payments intensive development reliable information multidimensional oversight port authority approach mining surface retorting large-scale testing in-situ conversion groundwater contamination oil shale industry National Oil Shale Association NOSA huge resource sustainable development economically feasible technology RD&D Research Development and Demonstration misconceptions Black Sunday environmental mitigation strategies inferior hydrocarbon resource federal leasing social impacts federal government funding federal production mandates stricter regulations in situ technologies Piceance Basin need for federal resources commercialization of surface technologies private research industry investments long term profit potential conventional petroleum oil shale technologies technical risk investment risk domestic resource offshore political risk economically viable small commercial operations BLM leases 10-year leases state requirements hydro data development plan permit approvals reclamation bonding AMSO American Shale Oil Corporation conventional oil and gas cost estimates 1970s improving economic return reducing investment risk costs of shale oil production project maturation demonstration plants public benefits technical parameters Unocal plant Battlement Mesa revenues taxes fees jobs infrastructure improvements long lived industry oil supply security decrease gasoline prices obstacles regional opposition carbon management water issues air issues technical solutions regulatory obstacles wildlife social benefits Estonian Oil Shale Plant petroleum transportation system liquid fuels transportation fuels oil importation costs and benefits cost-benefit analysis jet fuel gasoline diesel oil shale projects Shell Chevron Total Exxon OSEC EcoShale Paraho Enshale Enshale Pilot Plant Utah Shell Mahogany Project Freeze Wall Schlumberger AuraSource Quasar Energy LLC Percy Kean Clean Technologies IEP Independent Energy Partners Mountain West Energy PetroProbe University of Denver Phoenix-Wyoming Natural Resources Recovery Millennium Synfuels Chattanooga Corporation CRE Energy Global Resources Natural Soda/Sentient General Synfuels International ConocoPhillips Encana Anadarko The Elusive Bonanza Yankee ingenuity chasing a mirage hype U.S. Department of Energy DoE Colorado oil shale follies oil riches Denver Post Paul Foy rising crude oil prices Canadian tar sands ethanol GTL gas to liquid CTL coal to liquid production of oil shale metric tons Estonia deposit Russia Leningrad deposit Kashpir deposit United Kingdom UK Scotland Lothians Brazil Irati Formation China Maoming deposit Fushun deposit Germany Dotternhausen Sub-salt Tupi well costs petroleum quality conventional unconventional API gravity permeability Prudhoe Bay North Dakota kerogen tons barrels immature source rock plankton sediment black shale sapropelic coal energy content fuels natural gas crude oil coal cattle manure firewood municipal trash baked potatoes BTU/ton British Thermal Units energy Oil & Gas Journal nuclear energy in-situ electricity energy return Greenpeace carbon budget energy alternatives global carbon emissions fossil fuels Red Leaf Resources Ecoshale Process in-capsule process low water use Electrofrac hydraulic fracture fracking fracing hydraulic fracturing electrically conductive conductive heating production wells injection well extraction well U.S. oil production OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries FSU Former Soviet Union energy transition oil consumption remaining oil conventional oil tar sands bitumen coal liquids regional coals Colorado Coal Quality Data resource quality unconventionals Administrative Law Climate Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Environmental Health and Protection Environmental Law Environmental Policy Geotechnical Engineering Land Use Law Natural Resource Economics Natural Resources Law Natural Resources Management and Policy Oil Gas and Energy and Mineral Law President/Executive Department Public Policy Science and Technology Law State and Local Government Law Water Law Water Resource Management
spellingShingle	oil shale development oil shale costs benefits Rand Corporation prospects strategic significance domestic oil shale industry critical policy issues U.S. energy big picture oil production global liquids production million barrels per day liquids consumption imports problems with oil expensive insecure supplies environmental damage greenhouse gases GHGs limited alternatives biomass climate-friendly efficiency electrification oil shortage shortage of crude oil Frank Knox Peak Oil COAS crude oil anxiety syndrome global production of conventional oil extraction costs technology advances Colorado Green River Formation largest deposits in the world high recoverable estimates U.S. demand barrels per day bpd development timeline development stage R&D research and development facility size total production pilot plant scale-up commercial operations economic gains lower oil prices new jobs geopolitical benefits economic profits employment benefits federal government state government local government lease bonus payments royalties corporate income taxes shale oil jobs U.S. consumers national security increased supplies oil-exporting countries U.S. interests weapons munitions manufacture terrorist organizations portfolio of measures technical issues environmental issues governance issues environmental impacts socioeconomic impacts land use ecological impacts air quality climate change CO2 emissions water quality Colorado River drainage basin leaching of salts and toxics public services pioneer facility spent shale market risks federal lands leasing BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management water consumption Colorado River Basin incentives for pioneering firms royalty payments tax incentives public interest higher royalty payments intensive development reliable information multidimensional oversight port authority approach mining surface retorting large-scale testing in-situ conversion groundwater contamination oil shale industry National Oil Shale Association NOSA huge resource sustainable development economically feasible technology RD&D Research Development and Demonstration misconceptions Black Sunday environmental mitigation strategies inferior hydrocarbon resource federal leasing social impacts federal government funding federal production mandates stricter regulations in situ technologies Piceance Basin need for federal resources commercialization of surface technologies private research industry investments long term profit potential conventional petroleum oil shale technologies technical risk investment risk domestic resource offshore political risk economically viable small commercial operations BLM leases 10-year leases state requirements hydro data development plan permit approvals reclamation bonding AMSO American Shale Oil Corporation conventional oil and gas cost estimates 1970s improving economic return reducing investment risk costs of shale oil production project maturation demonstration plants public benefits technical parameters Unocal plant Battlement Mesa revenues taxes fees jobs infrastructure improvements long lived industry oil supply security decrease gasoline prices obstacles regional opposition carbon management water issues air issues technical solutions regulatory obstacles wildlife social benefits Estonian Oil Shale Plant petroleum transportation system liquid fuels transportation fuels oil importation costs and benefits cost-benefit analysis jet fuel gasoline diesel oil shale projects Shell Chevron Total Exxon OSEC EcoShale Paraho Enshale Enshale Pilot Plant Utah Shell Mahogany Project Freeze Wall Schlumberger AuraSource Quasar Energy LLC Percy Kean Clean Technologies IEP Independent Energy Partners Mountain West Energy PetroProbe University of Denver Phoenix-Wyoming Natural Resources Recovery Millennium Synfuels Chattanooga Corporation CRE Energy Global Resources Natural Soda/Sentient General Synfuels International ConocoPhillips Encana Anadarko The Elusive Bonanza Yankee ingenuity chasing a mirage hype U.S. Department of Energy DoE Colorado oil shale follies oil riches Denver Post Paul Foy rising crude oil prices Canadian tar sands ethanol GTL gas to liquid CTL coal to liquid production of oil shale metric tons Estonia deposit Russia Leningrad deposit Kashpir deposit United Kingdom UK Scotland Lothians Brazil Irati Formation China Maoming deposit Fushun deposit Germany Dotternhausen Sub-salt Tupi well costs petroleum quality conventional unconventional API gravity permeability Prudhoe Bay North Dakota kerogen tons barrels immature source rock plankton sediment black shale sapropelic coal energy content fuels natural gas crude oil coal cattle manure firewood municipal trash baked potatoes BTU/ton British Thermal Units energy Oil & Gas Journal nuclear energy in-situ electricity energy return Greenpeace carbon budget energy alternatives global carbon emissions fossil fuels Red Leaf Resources Ecoshale Process in-capsule process low water use Electrofrac hydraulic fracture fracking fracing hydraulic fracturing electrically conductive conductive heating production wells injection well extraction well U.S. oil production OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries FSU Former Soviet Union energy transition oil consumption remaining oil conventional oil tar sands bitumen coal liquids regional coals Colorado Coal Quality Data resource quality unconventionals Administrative Law Climate Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Environmental Health and Protection Environmental Law Environmental Policy Geotechnical Engineering Land Use Law Natural Resource Economics Natural Resources Law Natural Resources Management and Policy Oil Gas and Energy and Mineral Law President/Executive Department Public Policy Science and Technology Law State and Local Government Law Water Law Water Resource Management Bartis, Jim Vawter, Glenn Udall, Randy VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
topic_facet	oil shale development oil shale costs benefits Rand Corporation prospects strategic significance domestic oil shale industry critical policy issues U.S. energy big picture oil production global liquids production million barrels per day liquids consumption imports problems with oil expensive insecure supplies environmental damage greenhouse gases GHGs limited alternatives biomass climate-friendly efficiency electrification oil shortage shortage of crude oil Frank Knox Peak Oil COAS crude oil anxiety syndrome global production of conventional oil extraction costs technology advances Colorado Green River Formation largest deposits in the world high recoverable estimates U.S. demand barrels per day bpd development timeline development stage R&D research and development facility size total production pilot plant scale-up commercial operations economic gains lower oil prices new jobs geopolitical benefits economic profits employment benefits federal government state government local government lease bonus payments royalties corporate income taxes shale oil jobs U.S. consumers national security increased supplies oil-exporting countries U.S. interests weapons munitions manufacture terrorist organizations portfolio of measures technical issues environmental issues governance issues environmental impacts socioeconomic impacts land use ecological impacts air quality climate change CO2 emissions water quality Colorado River drainage basin leaching of salts and toxics public services pioneer facility spent shale market risks federal lands leasing BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management water consumption Colorado River Basin incentives for pioneering firms royalty payments tax incentives public interest higher royalty payments intensive development reliable information multidimensional oversight port authority approach mining surface retorting large-scale testing in-situ conversion groundwater contamination oil shale industry National Oil Shale Association NOSA huge resource sustainable development economically feasible technology RD&D Research Development and Demonstration misconceptions Black Sunday environmental mitigation strategies inferior hydrocarbon resource federal leasing social impacts federal government funding federal production mandates stricter regulations in situ technologies Piceance Basin need for federal resources commercialization of surface technologies private research industry investments long term profit potential conventional petroleum oil shale technologies technical risk investment risk domestic resource offshore political risk economically viable small commercial operations BLM leases 10-year leases state requirements hydro data development plan permit approvals reclamation bonding AMSO American Shale Oil Corporation conventional oil and gas cost estimates 1970s improving economic return reducing investment risk costs of shale oil production project maturation demonstration plants public benefits technical parameters Unocal plant Battlement Mesa revenues taxes fees jobs infrastructure improvements long lived industry oil supply security decrease gasoline prices obstacles regional opposition carbon management water issues air issues technical solutions regulatory obstacles wildlife social benefits Estonian Oil Shale Plant petroleum transportation system liquid fuels transportation fuels oil importation costs and benefits cost-benefit analysis jet fuel gasoline diesel oil shale projects Shell Chevron Total Exxon OSEC EcoShale Paraho Enshale Enshale Pilot Plant Utah Shell Mahogany Project Freeze Wall Schlumberger AuraSource Quasar Energy LLC Percy Kean Clean Technologies IEP Independent Energy Partners Mountain West Energy PetroProbe University of Denver Phoenix-Wyoming Natural Resources Recovery Millennium Synfuels Chattanooga Corporation CRE Energy Global Resources Natural Soda/Sentient General Synfuels International ConocoPhillips Encana Anadarko The Elusive Bonanza Yankee ingenuity chasing a mirage hype U.S. Department of Energy DoE Colorado oil shale follies oil riches Denver Post Paul Foy rising crude oil prices Canadian tar sands ethanol GTL gas to liquid CTL coal to liquid production of oil shale metric tons Estonia deposit Russia Leningrad deposit Kashpir deposit United Kingdom UK Scotland Lothians Brazil Irati Formation China Maoming deposit Fushun deposit Germany Dotternhausen Sub-salt Tupi well costs petroleum quality conventional unconventional API gravity permeability Prudhoe Bay North Dakota kerogen tons barrels immature source rock plankton sediment black shale sapropelic coal energy content fuels natural gas crude oil coal cattle manure firewood municipal trash baked potatoes BTU/ton British Thermal Units energy Oil & Gas Journal nuclear energy in-situ electricity energy return Greenpeace carbon budget energy alternatives global carbon emissions fossil fuels Red Leaf Resources Ecoshale Process in-capsule process low water use Electrofrac hydraulic fracture fracking fracing hydraulic fracturing electrically conductive conductive heating production wells injection well extraction well U.S. oil production OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries FSU Former Soviet Union energy transition oil consumption remaining oil conventional oil tar sands bitumen coal liquids regional coals Colorado Coal Quality Data resource quality unconventionals Administrative Law Climate Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Environmental Health and Protection Environmental Law Environmental Policy Geotechnical Engineering Land Use Law Natural Resource Economics Natural Resources Law Natural Resources Management and Policy Oil Gas and Energy and Mineral Law President/Executive Department Public Policy Science and Technology Law State and Local Government Law Water Law Water Resource Management
description	VIDEO: 10:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. SESSION 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development Moderator: Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center Speakers/Panelists: Randy Udall, Co‐founder, Association for the Study of Peak Oil‐USA Jim Bartis, Senior Policy Researcher, Rand Corporation Glenn Vawter, Executive Director, National Oil Shale Association
format	Text
author	Bartis, Jim Vawter, Glenn Udall, Randy
author_facet	Bartis, Jim Vawter, Glenn Udall, Randy
author_sort	Bartis, Jim
title	VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
title_short	VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
title_full	VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
title_fullStr	VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
title_full_unstemmed	VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development
title_sort	video: session 4: the costs and benefits of oil shale development
publisher	Colorado Law Scholarly Commons
publishDate	2010
url	https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development/3 https://youtu.be/6Omb1SZ_t-4
long_lat	ENVELOPE(-119.820,-119.820,55.917,55.917) ENVELOPE(-116.650,-116.650,-84.817,-84.817) ENVELOPE(6.148,6.148,62.615,62.615) ENVELOPE(-55.883,-55.883,-63.250,-63.250) ENVELOPE(-59.769,-59.769,-62.526,-62.526)
geographic	Bonanza Knox Peak Nosa Percy Yankee
geographic_facet	Bonanza Knox Peak Nosa Percy Yankee
genre	Prudhoe Bay
genre_facet	Prudhoe Bay
op_source	The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5)
op_relation	https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development/3 https://youtu.be/6Omb1SZ_t-4
_version_	1766174579318849536
spelling	ftunicolboulawl:oai:scholar.law.colorado.edu:promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development-1015 2023-05-15T18:03:39+02:00 VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development Bartis, Jim Vawter, Glenn Udall, Randy 2010-02-05T08:00:00Z https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development/3 https://youtu.be/6Omb1SZ_t-4 unknown Colorado Law Scholarly Commons https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/promise-and-peril-of-oil-shale-development/3 https://youtu.be/6Omb1SZ_t-4 The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) oil shale development oil shale costs benefits Rand Corporation prospects strategic significance domestic oil shale industry critical policy issues U.S. energy big picture oil production global liquids production million barrels per day liquids consumption imports problems with oil expensive insecure supplies environmental damage greenhouse gases GHGs limited alternatives biomass climate-friendly efficiency electrification oil shortage shortage of crude oil Frank Knox Peak Oil COAS crude oil anxiety syndrome global production of conventional oil extraction costs technology advances Colorado Green River Formation largest deposits in the world high recoverable estimates U.S. demand barrels per day bpd development timeline development stage R&D research and development facility size total production pilot plant scale-up commercial operations economic gains lower oil prices new jobs geopolitical benefits economic profits employment benefits federal government state government local government lease bonus payments royalties corporate income taxes shale oil jobs U.S. consumers national security increased supplies oil-exporting countries U.S. interests weapons munitions manufacture terrorist organizations portfolio of measures technical issues environmental issues governance issues environmental impacts socioeconomic impacts land use ecological impacts air quality climate change CO2 emissions water quality Colorado River drainage basin leaching of salts and toxics public services pioneer facility spent shale market risks federal lands leasing BLM U.S. Bureau of Land Management water consumption Colorado River Basin incentives for pioneering firms royalty payments tax incentives public interest higher royalty payments intensive development reliable information multidimensional oversight port authority approach mining surface retorting large-scale testing in-situ conversion groundwater contamination oil shale industry National Oil Shale Association NOSA huge resource sustainable development economically feasible technology RD&D Research Development and Demonstration misconceptions Black Sunday environmental mitigation strategies inferior hydrocarbon resource federal leasing social impacts federal government funding federal production mandates stricter regulations in situ technologies Piceance Basin need for federal resources commercialization of surface technologies private research industry investments long term profit potential conventional petroleum oil shale technologies technical risk investment risk domestic resource offshore political risk economically viable small commercial operations BLM leases 10-year leases state requirements hydro data development plan permit approvals reclamation bonding AMSO American Shale Oil Corporation conventional oil and gas cost estimates 1970s improving economic return reducing investment risk costs of shale oil production project maturation demonstration plants public benefits technical parameters Unocal plant Battlement Mesa revenues taxes fees jobs infrastructure improvements long lived industry oil supply security decrease gasoline prices obstacles regional opposition carbon management water issues air issues technical solutions regulatory obstacles wildlife social benefits Estonian Oil Shale Plant petroleum transportation system liquid fuels transportation fuels oil importation costs and benefits cost-benefit analysis jet fuel gasoline diesel oil shale projects Shell Chevron Total Exxon OSEC EcoShale Paraho Enshale Enshale Pilot Plant Utah Shell Mahogany Project Freeze Wall Schlumberger AuraSource Quasar Energy LLC Percy Kean Clean Technologies IEP Independent Energy Partners Mountain West Energy PetroProbe University of Denver Phoenix-Wyoming Natural Resources Recovery Millennium Synfuels Chattanooga Corporation CRE Energy Global Resources Natural Soda/Sentient General Synfuels International ConocoPhillips Encana Anadarko The Elusive Bonanza Yankee ingenuity chasing a mirage hype U.S. Department of Energy DoE Colorado oil shale follies oil riches Denver Post Paul Foy rising crude oil prices Canadian tar sands ethanol GTL gas to liquid CTL coal to liquid production of oil shale metric tons Estonia deposit Russia Leningrad deposit Kashpir deposit United Kingdom UK Scotland Lothians Brazil Irati Formation China Maoming deposit Fushun deposit Germany Dotternhausen Sub-salt Tupi well costs petroleum quality conventional unconventional API gravity permeability Prudhoe Bay North Dakota kerogen tons barrels immature source rock plankton sediment black shale sapropelic coal energy content fuels natural gas crude oil coal cattle manure firewood municipal trash baked potatoes BTU/ton British Thermal Units energy Oil & Gas Journal nuclear energy in-situ electricity energy return Greenpeace carbon budget energy alternatives global carbon emissions fossil fuels Red Leaf Resources Ecoshale Process in-capsule process low water use Electrofrac hydraulic fracture fracking fracing hydraulic fracturing electrically conductive conductive heating production wells injection well extraction well U.S. oil production OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries FSU Former Soviet Union energy transition oil consumption remaining oil conventional oil tar sands bitumen coal liquids regional coals Colorado Coal Quality Data resource quality unconventionals Administrative Law Climate Energy and Utilities Law Energy Policy Environmental Health and Protection Environmental Law Environmental Policy Geotechnical Engineering Land Use Law Natural Resource Economics Natural Resources Law Natural Resources Management and Policy Oil Gas and Energy and Mineral Law President/Executive Department Public Policy Science and Technology Law State and Local Government Law Water Law Water Resource Management text 2010 ftunicolboulawl 2022-02-13T08:19:29Z VIDEO: 10:45 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. SESSION 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development Moderator: Mark Squillace, Director, Natural Resources Law Center Speakers/Panelists: Randy Udall, Co‐founder, Association for the Study of Peak Oil‐USA Jim Bartis, Senior Policy Researcher, Rand Corporation Glenn Vawter, Executive Director, National Oil Shale Association Text Prudhoe Bay University of Colorado Boulder, Law School: Scholarly Commons Bonanza ENVELOPE(-119.820,-119.820,55.917,55.917) Knox Peak ENVELOPE(-116.650,-116.650,-84.817,-84.817) Nosa ENVELOPE(6.148,6.148,62.615,62.615) Percy ENVELOPE(-55.883,-55.883,-63.250,-63.250) Yankee ENVELOPE(-59.769,-59.769,-62.526,-62.526)

VIDEO: Session 4: The Costs and Benefits of Oil Shale Development

Similar Items