Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming

This article argues that states should take immediate, incremental steps toward supporting Restorative Ocean Farming (ROF). The health of our coastlines, for both the human and nonhuman communities, depends on high marine biodiversity, a goal which ROFs support. Presenting vast amounts of evidence t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pierce, Tara A.
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: UC Law SF Scholarship Repository 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol29/iss2/2
https://repository.uclawsf.edu/context/hastings_environmental_law_journal/article/1631/viewcontent/2_Pierce.pdf
id ftunicalifsflaw:oai:repository.uclawsf.edu:hastings_environmental_law_journal-1631
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunicalifsflaw:oai:repository.uclawsf.edu:hastings_environmental_law_journal-1631 2023-07-30T04:06:05+02:00 Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming Pierce, Tara A. 2023-07-01T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol29/iss2/2 https://repository.uclawsf.edu/context/hastings_environmental_law_journal/article/1631/viewcontent/2_Pierce.pdf unknown UC Law SF Scholarship Repository https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol29/iss2/2 https://repository.uclawsf.edu/context/hastings_environmental_law_journal/article/1631/viewcontent/2_Pierce.pdf UC Law Environmental Journal text 2023 ftunicalifsflaw 2023-07-11T07:18:24Z This article argues that states should take immediate, incremental steps toward supporting Restorative Ocean Farming (ROF). The health of our coastlines, for both the human and nonhuman communities, depends on high marine biodiversity, a goal which ROFs support. Presenting vast amounts of evidence that ROFs have an incredible amount of ecological and socio-economic benefits, ROFs also provide one step in the critical paradigm shift of improving ocean and coastal policy by taking a more holistic approach. This includes an emphasis on bioregional cooperation to ensure the highest ecological and social benefits. Waiting on federal legislation is waiting too long. However, states can look to previous attempts at federal legislation, like the Ocean-Based Climate Solutions Act, to guide their own law and policies. Additionally, there are examples of successful bioregional cooperation, like the California Ocean Acidification Action Plan, to guide states in creating policy and plans, uniting communities and increasing coastal resilience. The author concludes that states can take meaningful action now that provides equitable benefits to coastal communities and the nation. Perhaps most importantly, the emergence of ROFs in the United States signals a perspective shift away from policies with an extractive approach toward those that create mutually beneficial relationships between humans and their habitat by basing our interaction with the world on questions like “how does the ecosystem want to support us?” Text Ocean acidification Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftunicalifsflaw
language unknown
description This article argues that states should take immediate, incremental steps toward supporting Restorative Ocean Farming (ROF). The health of our coastlines, for both the human and nonhuman communities, depends on high marine biodiversity, a goal which ROFs support. Presenting vast amounts of evidence that ROFs have an incredible amount of ecological and socio-economic benefits, ROFs also provide one step in the critical paradigm shift of improving ocean and coastal policy by taking a more holistic approach. This includes an emphasis on bioregional cooperation to ensure the highest ecological and social benefits. Waiting on federal legislation is waiting too long. However, states can look to previous attempts at federal legislation, like the Ocean-Based Climate Solutions Act, to guide their own law and policies. Additionally, there are examples of successful bioregional cooperation, like the California Ocean Acidification Action Plan, to guide states in creating policy and plans, uniting communities and increasing coastal resilience. The author concludes that states can take meaningful action now that provides equitable benefits to coastal communities and the nation. Perhaps most importantly, the emergence of ROFs in the United States signals a perspective shift away from policies with an extractive approach toward those that create mutually beneficial relationships between humans and their habitat by basing our interaction with the world on questions like “how does the ecosystem want to support us?”
format Text
author Pierce, Tara A.
spellingShingle Pierce, Tara A.
Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
author_facet Pierce, Tara A.
author_sort Pierce, Tara A.
title Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
title_short Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
title_full Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
title_fullStr Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
title_full_unstemmed Partnering Law and Biodiversity for Healthy Coastal Communities: Restorative Ocean Farming
title_sort partnering law and biodiversity for healthy coastal communities: restorative ocean farming
publisher UC Law SF Scholarship Repository
publishDate 2023
url https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol29/iss2/2
https://repository.uclawsf.edu/context/hastings_environmental_law_journal/article/1631/viewcontent/2_Pierce.pdf
genre Ocean acidification
genre_facet Ocean acidification
op_source UC Law Environmental Journal
op_relation https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_environmental_law_journal/vol29/iss2/2
https://repository.uclawsf.edu/context/hastings_environmental_law_journal/article/1631/viewcontent/2_Pierce.pdf
_version_ 1772818476528828416