Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /

In The Marshall Decision and Native Rights Ken Coates explains the cross-cultural, legal, and political implications of the recent Supreme Court decision on the Donald Marshall case. He describes the events, personalities, and conflicts that brought the Maritimes to the brink of a major confrontatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Coates, Ken
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780773568778
id ftunicalfberklaw:oai:lawcat.berkeley.edu:1287379
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunicalfberklaw:oai:lawcat.berkeley.edu:1287379 2024-05-19T07:40:26+00:00 Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes / Coates, Ken 2024-04-10T08:01:07Z http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780773568778 eng eng doi:10.1515/9780773568778 https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778 https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780773568778 http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379 http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379 Text 2024 ftunicalfberklaw https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778 2024-05-01T01:05:59Z In The Marshall Decision and Native Rights Ken Coates explains the cross-cultural, legal, and political implications of the recent Supreme Court decision on the Donald Marshall case. He describes the events, personalities, and conflicts that brought the Maritimes to the brink of a major confrontation between Mi'kmaq and the non-Mi'kmaq fishers in the fall of 1999, detailing the bungling by federal departments and the lack of police preparedness. He shows how political, business, and Mi'kmaq leaders in the Maritimes handled the volatile situation, urging non-violence and speaking out against racism, in contrast to the way federal and regional leaders have responded in other parts of the country. Legal victories such as Marshall, argues Coates, are a double-edged sword that provide greater legal clarity but expand the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples in Canada. Coates recounts the history of Mi'kmaq-white contact in the region and considers the impact of native rights on natural resources, showing that the costs will be borne mainly by rural Canadians. By placing the local and regional reaction to the Marshall decision in the broader historical, national, and international context of indigenous political and legal rights The Marshall Decision and Native Rights shows how little Canada has learned from three decades of First Nations legal conflicts and how far the country is from meaningful reconciliation. Text First Nations Berkeley Law (University of California, Berkeley)
institution Open Polar
collection Berkeley Law (University of California, Berkeley)
op_collection_id ftunicalfberklaw
language English
description In The Marshall Decision and Native Rights Ken Coates explains the cross-cultural, legal, and political implications of the recent Supreme Court decision on the Donald Marshall case. He describes the events, personalities, and conflicts that brought the Maritimes to the brink of a major confrontation between Mi'kmaq and the non-Mi'kmaq fishers in the fall of 1999, detailing the bungling by federal departments and the lack of police preparedness. He shows how political, business, and Mi'kmaq leaders in the Maritimes handled the volatile situation, urging non-violence and speaking out against racism, in contrast to the way federal and regional leaders have responded in other parts of the country. Legal victories such as Marshall, argues Coates, are a double-edged sword that provide greater legal clarity but expand the gap between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples in Canada. Coates recounts the history of Mi'kmaq-white contact in the region and considers the impact of native rights on natural resources, showing that the costs will be borne mainly by rural Canadians. By placing the local and regional reaction to the Marshall decision in the broader historical, national, and international context of indigenous political and legal rights The Marshall Decision and Native Rights shows how little Canada has learned from three decades of First Nations legal conflicts and how far the country is from meaningful reconciliation.
format Text
author Coates, Ken
spellingShingle Coates, Ken
Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
author_facet Coates, Ken
author_sort Coates, Ken
title Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
title_short Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
title_full Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
title_fullStr Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
title_full_unstemmed Marshall Decision and Native Rights ::The Marshall Decision and Mi'kmaq Rights in the Maritimes /
title_sort marshall decision and native rights ::the marshall decision and mi'kmaq rights in the maritimes /
publishDate 2024
url http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780773568778
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379
op_relation doi:10.1515/9780773568778
https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778
https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9780773568778
http://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1287379
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773568778
_version_ 1799480003363078144