Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods

Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the tw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI, SPADA, GIORGIO, S. CIANETTI
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11585/772231
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract
id ftunibolognairis:oai:cris.unibo.it:11585/772231
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunibolognairis:oai:cris.unibo.it:11585/772231 2024-04-14T08:12:50+00:00 Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI SPADA, GIORGIO S. CIANETTI N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI SPADA, GIORGIO S. CIANETTI 2004 STAMPA http://hdl.handle.net/11585/772231 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000221422500031 volume:157 firstpage:890 lastpage:900 numberofpages:11 journal:GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL http://hdl.handle.net/11585/772231 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-2542627438 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract mantle viscosity neighbourhood algorithm postglacial rebound simulated annealing info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2004 ftunibolognairis https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x 2024-03-21T18:28:27Z Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the two inversion methods show comparable performances. When a larger number of dimensions is involved (specifically Nd = 6), we directly show that simulated annealing is less effective than neighbourhood algorithm in overcoming the obstacles that are found in the model space when our specific data set is employed. This study confirms that modifications of the conventional Monte Carlo inversion method, such as simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are viable tools to determine the viscosity profile of the mantle, which, until recently, has been mainly tackled by means of linearized techniques. Article in Journal/Newspaper Hudson Bay IRIS Università degli Studi di Bologna (CRIS - Current Research Information System) Hudson Hudson Bay Geophysical Journal International 157 2 890 900
institution Open Polar
collection IRIS Università degli Studi di Bologna (CRIS - Current Research Information System)
op_collection_id ftunibolognairis
language English
topic mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
spellingShingle mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
S. CIANETTI
Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
topic_facet mantle viscosity
neighbourhood algorithm
postglacial rebound
simulated annealing
description Two direct search methods, simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are applied to the inversion of the viscosity profile of the mantle using relative sea level time-histories for the Hudson Bay region. In problems characterized by a low-dimensional model space (Nd = 2 in this study), the two inversion methods show comparable performances. When a larger number of dimensions is involved (specifically Nd = 6), we directly show that simulated annealing is less effective than neighbourhood algorithm in overcoming the obstacles that are found in the model space when our specific data set is employed. This study confirms that modifications of the conventional Monte Carlo inversion method, such as simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm, are viable tools to determine the viscosity profile of the mantle, which, until recently, has been mainly tackled by means of linearized techniques.
author2 N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
S. CIANETTI
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
S. CIANETTI
author_facet N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
SPADA, GIORGIO
S. CIANETTI
author_sort N. PIANA AGOSTINETTI
title Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_short Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_full Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_fullStr Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_full_unstemmed Mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
title_sort mantle viscosity inference: a comparison between simulated annealing and neighbourhood algorithm inversion methods
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/11585/772231
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract
geographic Hudson
Hudson Bay
geographic_facet Hudson
Hudson Bay
genre Hudson Bay
genre_facet Hudson Bay
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000221422500031
volume:157
firstpage:890
lastpage:900
numberofpages:11
journal:GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
http://hdl.handle.net/11585/772231
doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-2542627438
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x/abstract
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02237.x
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 157
container_issue 2
container_start_page 890
op_container_end_page 900
_version_ 1796310677122449408