Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?

Increasing goose population sizes gives rise to conflicts with human socioeconomic interests and in some circumstances conservation interests. Grazing by high abundances of geese in grasslands is postulated to lead to a very short and homogeneous sward height negatively affecting cover for breeding...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Madsen, Jesper, Marcussen, Luna Kondrup, Knudsen, Niels, Balsby, Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg, Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923
https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/176033936/Madsen_et_al._2019_Ecology_and_Evolution_.pdf
id ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec 2024-06-23T07:51:39+00:00 Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders? Madsen, Jesper Marcussen, Luna Kondrup Knudsen, Niels Balsby, Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann 2019-12 application/pdf https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923 https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/176033936/Madsen_et_al._2019_Ecology_and_Evolution_.pdf eng eng https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Madsen , J , Marcussen , L K , Knudsen , N , Balsby , T J S & Clausen , K K 2019 , ' Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders? ' , Ecology and Evolution , vol. 9 , no. 24 , pp. 14512-14522 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923 barnacle goose black-tailed godwit breeding habitat lapwing laser light meadow birds shorebirds article 2019 ftuniaarhuspubl https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923 2024-06-04T14:24:06Z Increasing goose population sizes gives rise to conflicts with human socioeconomic interests and in some circumstances conservation interests. Grazing by high abundances of geese in grasslands is postulated to lead to a very short and homogeneous sward height negatively affecting cover for breeding meadow birds and impacting survival of nests and chicks. We studied the effects of spring grazing barnacle geese Branta leucopsis and brent geese Branta bernicla on occupancy of extensively farmed freshwater grasslands by nesting and brood-rearing waders on the island Mandø in the Danish Wadden Sea. We hypothesized that goose grazing would lead to a shorter grass sward, negatively affecting the field occupancy by territorial/nesting and chickrearing waders, particularly species preferring taller vegetation. Goose grazing led to a short grass sward (<5 cm height) over most of the island. To achieve a variation in sward height, we kept geese off certain fields using laser light. We analyzed effects of field size, sward height, mosaic structure of the vegetation, proximity to shrub as cover for potential predators, and elevation above ground water level as a measure of wetness on field occupancy by nesting and chick-rearing waders. The analysis indicated that the most important factor explaining field occupancy by nesting redshank Tringa totanus, black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa, oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus and lapwing Vanellus vanellus as well as by chick-rearing black-tailed godwit and lapwing was short vegetation height. Distance to shrub cover and elevation were less important. Hence, despite very intensive goose grazing, we could not detect any negative effect on the field occupancy by nesting nor chick-rearing waders, including redshank and black-tailed godwit, which are known to favor longer vegetation to conceal their nests and hide their chicks. Possible negative effects may be buffered by mosaic structures in fields and proximity to taller vegetation along fences and ditches. Article in Journal/Newspaper Barnacle goose Branta bernicla Branta leucopsis brent geese Vanellus vanellus black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa Aarhus University: Research Ecology and Evolution 9 24 14512 14522
institution Open Polar
collection Aarhus University: Research
op_collection_id ftuniaarhuspubl
language English
topic barnacle goose
black-tailed godwit
breeding habitat
lapwing
laser light
meadow birds
shorebirds
spellingShingle barnacle goose
black-tailed godwit
breeding habitat
lapwing
laser light
meadow birds
shorebirds
Madsen, Jesper
Marcussen, Luna Kondrup
Knudsen, Niels
Balsby, Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg
Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann
Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
topic_facet barnacle goose
black-tailed godwit
breeding habitat
lapwing
laser light
meadow birds
shorebirds
description Increasing goose population sizes gives rise to conflicts with human socioeconomic interests and in some circumstances conservation interests. Grazing by high abundances of geese in grasslands is postulated to lead to a very short and homogeneous sward height negatively affecting cover for breeding meadow birds and impacting survival of nests and chicks. We studied the effects of spring grazing barnacle geese Branta leucopsis and brent geese Branta bernicla on occupancy of extensively farmed freshwater grasslands by nesting and brood-rearing waders on the island Mandø in the Danish Wadden Sea. We hypothesized that goose grazing would lead to a shorter grass sward, negatively affecting the field occupancy by territorial/nesting and chickrearing waders, particularly species preferring taller vegetation. Goose grazing led to a short grass sward (<5 cm height) over most of the island. To achieve a variation in sward height, we kept geese off certain fields using laser light. We analyzed effects of field size, sward height, mosaic structure of the vegetation, proximity to shrub as cover for potential predators, and elevation above ground water level as a measure of wetness on field occupancy by nesting and chick-rearing waders. The analysis indicated that the most important factor explaining field occupancy by nesting redshank Tringa totanus, black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa, oystercatcher Haematopus ostralegus and lapwing Vanellus vanellus as well as by chick-rearing black-tailed godwit and lapwing was short vegetation height. Distance to shrub cover and elevation were less important. Hence, despite very intensive goose grazing, we could not detect any negative effect on the field occupancy by nesting nor chick-rearing waders, including redshank and black-tailed godwit, which are known to favor longer vegetation to conceal their nests and hide their chicks. Possible negative effects may be buffered by mosaic structures in fields and proximity to taller vegetation along fences and ditches.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Madsen, Jesper
Marcussen, Luna Kondrup
Knudsen, Niels
Balsby, Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg
Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann
author_facet Madsen, Jesper
Marcussen, Luna Kondrup
Knudsen, Niels
Balsby, Thorsten Johannes Skovbjerg
Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann
author_sort Madsen, Jesper
title Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
title_short Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
title_full Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
title_fullStr Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
title_full_unstemmed Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
title_sort does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders?
publishDate 2019
url https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923
https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/176033936/Madsen_et_al._2019_Ecology_and_Evolution_.pdf
genre Barnacle goose
Branta bernicla
Branta leucopsis
brent geese
Vanellus vanellus
black-tailed godwit
Limosa limosa
genre_facet Barnacle goose
Branta bernicla
Branta leucopsis
brent geese
Vanellus vanellus
black-tailed godwit
Limosa limosa
op_source Madsen , J , Marcussen , L K , Knudsen , N , Balsby , T J S & Clausen , K K 2019 , ' Does intensive goose grazing affect breeding waders? ' , Ecology and Evolution , vol. 9 , no. 24 , pp. 14512-14522 . https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923
op_relation https://pure.au.dk/portal/en/publications/a61ffd8f-8c3e-4c40-9fb4-f7326fe7d7ec
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5923
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
container_issue 24
container_start_page 14512
op_container_end_page 14522
_version_ 1802642772398702592