Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species

Prey size selection in some bird species is determined by the size of the beak. However, we assumed for bird species swallowing whole prey that a cognitive process may be involved. As cognitive feature, brain mass was used. We hypothesized that the mass of the brain was more strongly positively corr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLOS ONE
Main Authors: Laursen, Karsten, Møller, Anders Pape
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/brain-mass-explains-prey-size-selection-better-than-beak-gizzard-and-body-size-in-a-benthivorous-duck-species(a39eb20a-f43d-416f-a0bb-4cf65f6987c5).html
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103609758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a39eb20a-f43d-416f-a0bb-4cf65f6987c5
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a39eb20a-f43d-416f-a0bb-4cf65f6987c5 2023-05-15T18:20:26+02:00 Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species Laursen, Karsten Møller, Anders Pape 2021-03 https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/brain-mass-explains-prey-size-selection-better-than-beak-gizzard-and-body-size-in-a-benthivorous-duck-species(a39eb20a-f43d-416f-a0bb-4cf65f6987c5).html https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103609758&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Laursen , K & Møller , A P 2021 , ' Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species ' , PLOS ONE , vol. 16 , no. 3 , e0248615 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615 article 2021 ftuniaarhuspubl https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615 2021-08-11T22:46:35Z Prey size selection in some bird species is determined by the size of the beak. However, we assumed for bird species swallowing whole prey that a cognitive process may be involved. As cognitive feature, brain mass was used. We hypothesized that the mass of the brain was more strongly positively correlated with prey size than morphological features such as beak volume, gizzard mass and body mass. We tested this hypothesis on eiders Somateria mollissima that swallow the prey whole, by using mean and maximum size of nine prey categories. Eiders were collected at the main wintering grounds in Denmark. As index of brain mass we used head volume, which is positively correlated with brain mass (r 2 = 0.73). Head volume of eiders was significantly, positive correlated with mean and maximum size of blue mussels Mytilus edulis, razor clams Ensis directus and all prey sizes combined and the maximum size of draft whelk Hinia reticulata and conch Buccinum undatum. Gizzard mass was also significantly positively correlated with maximum size of draft whelk and conch. Beak volume and body mass was not significantly correlated with the size of any of the nine food items. Analyses of effect size for organs showed that head volume was positively related to prey size, whereas beak volume, gizzard mass and body mass did not show a significant positive relationship. These results indicate that cognitive processes connected to brain mass may be involved in prey size selection by eiders. Article in Journal/Newspaper Somateria mollissima Aarhus University: Research The Beak ENVELOPE(-130.771,-130.771,56.466,56.466) PLOS ONE 16 3 e0248615
institution Open Polar
collection Aarhus University: Research
op_collection_id ftuniaarhuspubl
language English
description Prey size selection in some bird species is determined by the size of the beak. However, we assumed for bird species swallowing whole prey that a cognitive process may be involved. As cognitive feature, brain mass was used. We hypothesized that the mass of the brain was more strongly positively correlated with prey size than morphological features such as beak volume, gizzard mass and body mass. We tested this hypothesis on eiders Somateria mollissima that swallow the prey whole, by using mean and maximum size of nine prey categories. Eiders were collected at the main wintering grounds in Denmark. As index of brain mass we used head volume, which is positively correlated with brain mass (r 2 = 0.73). Head volume of eiders was significantly, positive correlated with mean and maximum size of blue mussels Mytilus edulis, razor clams Ensis directus and all prey sizes combined and the maximum size of draft whelk Hinia reticulata and conch Buccinum undatum. Gizzard mass was also significantly positively correlated with maximum size of draft whelk and conch. Beak volume and body mass was not significantly correlated with the size of any of the nine food items. Analyses of effect size for organs showed that head volume was positively related to prey size, whereas beak volume, gizzard mass and body mass did not show a significant positive relationship. These results indicate that cognitive processes connected to brain mass may be involved in prey size selection by eiders.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Laursen, Karsten
Møller, Anders Pape
spellingShingle Laursen, Karsten
Møller, Anders Pape
Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
author_facet Laursen, Karsten
Møller, Anders Pape
author_sort Laursen, Karsten
title Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
title_short Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
title_full Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
title_fullStr Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
title_full_unstemmed Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
title_sort brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species
publishDate 2021
url https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/brain-mass-explains-prey-size-selection-better-than-beak-gizzard-and-body-size-in-a-benthivorous-duck-species(a39eb20a-f43d-416f-a0bb-4cf65f6987c5).html
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103609758&partnerID=8YFLogxK
long_lat ENVELOPE(-130.771,-130.771,56.466,56.466)
geographic The Beak
geographic_facet The Beak
genre Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Somateria mollissima
op_source Laursen , K & Møller , A P 2021 , ' Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species ' , PLOS ONE , vol. 16 , no. 3 , e0248615 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248615
container_title PLOS ONE
container_volume 16
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0248615
_version_ 1766197968730324992