Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture

Pinniped depredation at aquaculture sites is a globally recognized problem. To mitigate depredation, the aquaculture sector uses acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) as a non-lethal alternative to shooting pinnipeds interacting with caged finfish. However, it is unclear whether sound emissions from ADD...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Main Authors: Findlay, Charlotte R., Hastie, Gordon D., Farcas, Adrian, Merchant, Nathan D., Risch, Denise, Wilson, Ben
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/exposure-of-individual-harbour-seals-phoca-vitulina-and-waters-surrounding-protected-habitats-to-acoustic-deterrent-noise-from-aquaculture(82102a11-5895-48ef-b41a-c573c14bd151).html
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126233391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/82102a11-5895-48ef-b41a-c573c14bd151
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuniaarhuspubl:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/82102a11-5895-48ef-b41a-c573c14bd151 2023-05-15T17:58:58+02:00 Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture Findlay, Charlotte R. Hastie, Gordon D. Farcas, Adrian Merchant, Nathan D. Risch, Denise Wilson, Ben 2022-05 https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/exposure-of-individual-harbour-seals-phoca-vitulina-and-waters-surrounding-protected-habitats-to-acoustic-deterrent-noise-from-aquaculture(82102a11-5895-48ef-b41a-c573c14bd151).html https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126233391&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Findlay , C R , Hastie , G D , Farcas , A , Merchant , N D , Risch , D & Wilson , B 2022 , ' Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture ' , Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems , vol. 32 , no. 5 , pp. 766-780 . https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800 acoustic deterrent device (ADD) aquaculture depredation harbour seals marine protected areas noise pollution pinnipeds article 2022 ftuniaarhuspubl https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800 2023-01-25T23:54:53Z Pinniped depredation at aquaculture sites is a globally recognized problem. To mitigate depredation, the aquaculture sector uses acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) as a non-lethal alternative to shooting pinnipeds interacting with caged finfish. However, it is unclear whether sound emissions from ADDs have the potential to also impact non-target pinnipeds at spatial scales relevant to populations. Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking data from seven harbour seals tagged in a non-aquaculture context, on the west coast of Scotland, in 2017 were combined with modelled maps of ADD noise to quantify sound exposure and estimate the potential for auditory impairment. The acoustic model applied an energy flux approach across the main frequency range of ADDs (2–40 kHz). Predictions of temporary and permanent auditory threshold shifts were made using seal location data and published noise exposure criteria. The acoustic exposure of waters (10-km buffers) surrounding protected habitats (i.e. designated haul outs and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)) on the west coast of Scotland was also assessed. All tagged seals and waters surrounding 51 of 56 protected sites were predicted to be exposed to ADD noise exceeding median ambient sound levels. Temporary auditory impairment was predicted to occur in one of the seven tagged harbour seals and across 1.7% of waters surrounding protected habitats over a 24-hour period, when assuming a 100% ADD duty cycle. Although the predicted risk of auditory impairment appears to be relatively low, these findings suggest that harbour seals inhabiting inshore waters off western Scotland are routinely exposed to ADD noise that exceeds median ambient sound levels. This chronic exposure risks negative consequences for individual harbour seals among the wider population in this region. The use of ADDs to mitigate pinniped depredation should be carefully considered to reduce unintended habitat-wide impacts on non-target species, including pinnipeds that are not specifically interacting with ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Phoca vitulina Aarhus University: Research Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 32 5 766 780
institution Open Polar
collection Aarhus University: Research
op_collection_id ftuniaarhuspubl
language English
topic acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
aquaculture
depredation
harbour seals
marine protected areas
noise pollution
pinnipeds
spellingShingle acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
aquaculture
depredation
harbour seals
marine protected areas
noise pollution
pinnipeds
Findlay, Charlotte R.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Farcas, Adrian
Merchant, Nathan D.
Risch, Denise
Wilson, Ben
Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
topic_facet acoustic deterrent device (ADD)
aquaculture
depredation
harbour seals
marine protected areas
noise pollution
pinnipeds
description Pinniped depredation at aquaculture sites is a globally recognized problem. To mitigate depredation, the aquaculture sector uses acoustic deterrent devices (ADDs) as a non-lethal alternative to shooting pinnipeds interacting with caged finfish. However, it is unclear whether sound emissions from ADDs have the potential to also impact non-target pinnipeds at spatial scales relevant to populations. Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking data from seven harbour seals tagged in a non-aquaculture context, on the west coast of Scotland, in 2017 were combined with modelled maps of ADD noise to quantify sound exposure and estimate the potential for auditory impairment. The acoustic model applied an energy flux approach across the main frequency range of ADDs (2–40 kHz). Predictions of temporary and permanent auditory threshold shifts were made using seal location data and published noise exposure criteria. The acoustic exposure of waters (10-km buffers) surrounding protected habitats (i.e. designated haul outs and Special Areas of Conservation (SACs)) on the west coast of Scotland was also assessed. All tagged seals and waters surrounding 51 of 56 protected sites were predicted to be exposed to ADD noise exceeding median ambient sound levels. Temporary auditory impairment was predicted to occur in one of the seven tagged harbour seals and across 1.7% of waters surrounding protected habitats over a 24-hour period, when assuming a 100% ADD duty cycle. Although the predicted risk of auditory impairment appears to be relatively low, these findings suggest that harbour seals inhabiting inshore waters off western Scotland are routinely exposed to ADD noise that exceeds median ambient sound levels. This chronic exposure risks negative consequences for individual harbour seals among the wider population in this region. The use of ADDs to mitigate pinniped depredation should be carefully considered to reduce unintended habitat-wide impacts on non-target species, including pinnipeds that are not specifically interacting with ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Findlay, Charlotte R.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Farcas, Adrian
Merchant, Nathan D.
Risch, Denise
Wilson, Ben
author_facet Findlay, Charlotte R.
Hastie, Gordon D.
Farcas, Adrian
Merchant, Nathan D.
Risch, Denise
Wilson, Ben
author_sort Findlay, Charlotte R.
title Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
title_short Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
title_full Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
title_fullStr Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
title_full_unstemmed Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
title_sort exposure of individual harbour seals (phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture
publishDate 2022
url https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/exposure-of-individual-harbour-seals-phoca-vitulina-and-waters-surrounding-protected-habitats-to-acoustic-deterrent-noise-from-aquaculture(82102a11-5895-48ef-b41a-c573c14bd151).html
https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126233391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
genre Phoca vitulina
genre_facet Phoca vitulina
op_source Findlay , C R , Hastie , G D , Farcas , A , Merchant , N D , Risch , D & Wilson , B 2022 , ' Exposure of individual harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) and waters surrounding protected habitats to acoustic deterrent noise from aquaculture ' , Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems , vol. 32 , no. 5 , pp. 766-780 . https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3800
container_title Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
container_volume 32
container_issue 5
container_start_page 766
op_container_end_page 780
_version_ 1766167699355860992