Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project

Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remediation Journal
Main Authors: Cundy, Andrew, Bardos, Richard, Puschenreiter, M., Witters, N., Mench, M., Bert, V., Friesl-Hanl, W., Müller, I., Weyens, Nele, Vangronsveld, J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/078ffe40-9f55-44c2-be59-6466fa39a63f
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
https://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/files/395317/Remediation%20journal%20paper%20preprint.pdf
id ftunbrightoncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/078ffe40-9f55-44c2-be59-6466fa39a63f
record_format openpolar
spelling ftunbrightoncris:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/078ffe40-9f55-44c2-be59-6466fa39a63f 2023-05-15T16:28:45+02:00 Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project Cundy, Andrew Bardos, Richard Puschenreiter, M. Witters, N. Mench, M. Bert, V. Friesl-Hanl, W. Müller, I. Weyens, Nele Vangronsveld, J. 2015-06-10 application/pdf https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/078ffe40-9f55-44c2-be59-6466fa39a63f https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 https://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/files/395317/Remediation%20journal%20paper%20preprint.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Cundy , A , Bardos , R , Puschenreiter , M , Witters , N , Mench , M , Bert , V , Friesl-Hanl , W , Müller , I , Weyens , N & Vangronsveld , J 2015 , ' Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project ' , Remediation Journal , vol. 25 , no. 3 , pp. 101-114 . https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 article 2015 ftunbrightoncris https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 2022-01-01T08:45:29Z Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decisionmaking and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework. Article in Journal/Newspaper Greenland The University of Brighton Research Portal Greenland Remediation Journal 25 3 101 114
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Brighton Research Portal
op_collection_id ftunbrightoncris
language English
description Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decisionmaking and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cundy, Andrew
Bardos, Richard
Puschenreiter, M.
Witters, N.
Mench, M.
Bert, V.
Friesl-Hanl, W.
Müller, I.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, J.
spellingShingle Cundy, Andrew
Bardos, Richard
Puschenreiter, M.
Witters, N.
Mench, M.
Bert, V.
Friesl-Hanl, W.
Müller, I.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, J.
Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
author_facet Cundy, Andrew
Bardos, Richard
Puschenreiter, M.
Witters, N.
Mench, M.
Bert, V.
Friesl-Hanl, W.
Müller, I.
Weyens, Nele
Vangronsveld, J.
author_sort Cundy, Andrew
title Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_short Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_full Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_fullStr Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_full_unstemmed Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project
title_sort developing effective decision support for the application of “gentle” remediation options: the greenland project
publishDate 2015
url https://research.brighton.ac.uk/en/publications/078ffe40-9f55-44c2-be59-6466fa39a63f
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
https://cris.brighton.ac.uk/ws/files/395317/Remediation%20journal%20paper%20preprint.pdf
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_source Cundy , A , Bardos , R , Puschenreiter , M , Witters , N , Mench , M , Bert , V , Friesl-Hanl , W , Müller , I , Weyens , N & Vangronsveld , J 2015 , ' Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” Remediation Options: The GREENLAND Project ' , Remediation Journal , vol. 25 , no. 3 , pp. 101-114 . https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
container_title Remediation Journal
container_volume 25
container_issue 3
container_start_page 101
op_container_end_page 114
_version_ 1766018422026534912