From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008

This article explores how recent curricular reform in Australia has been responsive to a culture of redress. It argues that taken together, the 2008 National Apology to the Stolen Generations and the 2010 national curriculum reform marked a turning point, whereby settler colonial injustices have sin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Curriculum Studies
Main Author: Keynes, M
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis Group 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11343/344613
id ftumelbourne:oai:jupiter.its.unimelb.edu.au:11343/344613
record_format openpolar
spelling ftumelbourne:oai:jupiter.its.unimelb.edu.au:11343/344613 2024-06-02T08:06:46+00:00 From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008 Keynes, M 2024 http://hdl.handle.net/11343/344613 en eng Taylor and Francis Group issn:0022-0272 doi:10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612 Keynes, M. (2024). From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56 (3), https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612. 0022-0272 http://hdl.handle.net/11343/344613 CC BY-NC-ND https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Journal Article 2024 ftumelbourne https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612 2024-05-06T14:44:24Z This article explores how recent curricular reform in Australia has been responsive to a culture of redress. It argues that taken together, the 2008 National Apology to the Stolen Generations and the 2010 national curriculum reform marked a turning point, whereby settler colonial injustices have since been systematically included in the curriculum. This is explored through a case study analysis of the two iterations of the Victorian Curriculum: History post-Apology— 2012 and 2016—the latter of which remains in current use. Using discourse analysis methods, this article argues that the inclusion of colonial injustice in the post-Apology era signals a consensus that has emerged around the significance of representing injustice in history curriculum, and by extension, for shaping future citizens. Through close textual analysis of the curriculum documents, this article finds that representations of historical injustice have been organized by four frames: memorialization, equivalence, personalization, and human rights. It argues that these frames curtail opportunities for the development of an understanding of the structural character and effects of settler colonialism, and limit consideration of the longer history of Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. These failures raise questions about how impending reforms might respond to the contemporary political context where treaty negotiations and formal truth-telling with First Nations’ polities are unfolding. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations The University of Melbourne: Digital Repository Journal of Curriculum Studies 56 3 339 354
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Melbourne: Digital Repository
op_collection_id ftumelbourne
language English
description This article explores how recent curricular reform in Australia has been responsive to a culture of redress. It argues that taken together, the 2008 National Apology to the Stolen Generations and the 2010 national curriculum reform marked a turning point, whereby settler colonial injustices have since been systematically included in the curriculum. This is explored through a case study analysis of the two iterations of the Victorian Curriculum: History post-Apology— 2012 and 2016—the latter of which remains in current use. Using discourse analysis methods, this article argues that the inclusion of colonial injustice in the post-Apology era signals a consensus that has emerged around the significance of representing injustice in history curriculum, and by extension, for shaping future citizens. Through close textual analysis of the curriculum documents, this article finds that representations of historical injustice have been organized by four frames: memorialization, equivalence, personalization, and human rights. It argues that these frames curtail opportunities for the development of an understanding of the structural character and effects of settler colonialism, and limit consideration of the longer history of Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination. These failures raise questions about how impending reforms might respond to the contemporary political context where treaty negotiations and formal truth-telling with First Nations’ polities are unfolding.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Keynes, M
spellingShingle Keynes, M
From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
author_facet Keynes, M
author_sort Keynes, M
title From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
title_short From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
title_full From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
title_fullStr From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
title_full_unstemmed From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008
title_sort from apology to truth? settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in australia since 2008
publisher Taylor and Francis Group
publishDate 2024
url http://hdl.handle.net/11343/344613
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation issn:0022-0272
doi:10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612
Keynes, M. (2024). From apology to truth? Settler colonial injustice and curricular reform in Australia since 2008. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56 (3), https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612.
0022-0272
http://hdl.handle.net/11343/344613
op_rights CC BY-NC-ND
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2024.2323612
container_title Journal of Curriculum Studies
container_volume 56
container_issue 3
container_start_page 339
op_container_end_page 354
_version_ 1800751730442371072