Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis

As modular weapon systems allow cost‐effective upgrades of a vessel's war‐fighting capability, the degradation of the difficult‐to‐upgrade structure of the vessel may soon become one of the key drivers of vessel retirement and lifecycle maintenance costing. Existing structural design approaches...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Naval Engineers Journal
Main Author: Collette, Matthew
Other Authors: Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department of the University of Michigan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Blackwell Publishing Inc 2011
Subjects:
Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
Engineering
Arctic
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x
id ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/90260
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of Michigan: Deep Blue
op_collection_id ftumdeepblue
language unknown
topic Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
Engineering
spellingShingle Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
Engineering
Collette, Matthew
Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
topic_facet Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering
Engineering
description As modular weapon systems allow cost‐effective upgrades of a vessel's war‐fighting capability, the degradation of the difficult‐to‐upgrade structure of the vessel may soon become one of the key drivers of vessel retirement and lifecycle maintenance costing. Existing structural design approaches are reviewed, along with recent developments in this field. It is argued that recent research has produced a number of ad hoc metrics for structural design, such as producability; however, to truly address the needs of future ship design teams it is necessary to integrate several such metrics in a systems‐engineering view to evaluate how the structural system contributes to the overall capabilities and costs of a proposed vessel. Potential architectures for this approach are discussed, along with key shortcomings. A comparative example is given for structural fatigue of a strength deck under global bending loading, comparing the traditional design approach with a systems‐oriented view. Peer Reviewed http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90260/1/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x.pdf
author2 Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department of the University of Michigan
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Collette, Matthew
author_facet Collette, Matthew
author_sort Collette, Matthew
title Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
title_short Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
title_full Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
title_fullStr Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis
title_sort hull structures as a system: supporting lifecycle analysis
publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
publishDate 2011
url https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Collette, Matthew (2011). "Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis." Naval Engineers Journal 123(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260>
0028-1425
1559-3584
https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260
doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x
Naval Engineers Journal
Barentine, J., “A process‐based cost estimating tool for ship structural designs.” Available at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/10557. Accessed October 22, 2010.
Collette, M., M. Cooper, A. Mesbahi, and A. Incecik, “An integrated reliability, risk analysis, and cost model for preliminary structural design: a module of the SAFETY@SPEED design methodology,” In FAST 2005. Eighth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation. St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 June 2005.
Collette, M. and A. Incecik, “ An approach for reliability‐based fatigue design of welded joints on aluminunn high‐speed vessels,” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 85 – 98, 2006.
Hess, P., “Reliability‐based operational performance metrics for ship structures.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2002.
Hoppe, H., “ Goal‐based standards—a new approach to the international regulation of ship construction,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 169 – 180, 2005.
Koenig, P., D. Nalchajian, and J. Hootman, “ Ship service life and naval force structure,” Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 69 – 77, 2009.
NATO, “ANEP 77 Naval Ship Code.” North Atlantic Treaty Organization, July 2010.
OPNAV, “Operational Availability Handbook.” Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction, 1987.
Rigo, P., “ Least‐cost structural optimization oriented preliminary design,” Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 17, pp. 202 – 215, 2001.
Sage, A.P. and J.E. Armstrong Jr., Introduction to systems engineering, 1st ed., Wiley‐Interscience, New York, 2000.
Sames, P.C. and R. Hamann, “ Towards environmental risk acceptance criteria,” In 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2008, June 9, 2008–June 13, 2008, Estoril, Portugal. ASME Vol. 2, pp. 277 – 283, 2008.
Sielski, R., SSC‐452 Aluminum structure design and fabrication guide, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, 2007.
Turan, O., A.İ. Ölçer, I. Lazakis, P. Rigo, and J.D. Caprace, “ Maintenance/repair and production‐oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage,” Ships and Offshore Structures, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 107 – 125, 2009.
op_rights IndexNoFollow
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x
container_title Naval Engineers Journal
container_volume 123
container_issue 3
container_start_page 45
op_container_end_page 55
_version_ 1774713583578382336
spelling ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/90260 2023-08-20T04:03:11+02:00 Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis Collette, Matthew Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department of the University of Michigan 2011-09 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x unknown Blackwell Publishing Inc Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Collette, Matthew (2011). "Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis." Naval Engineers Journal 123(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260> 0028-1425 1559-3584 https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260 doi:10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x Naval Engineers Journal Barentine, J., “A process‐based cost estimating tool for ship structural designs.” Available at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/10557. Accessed October 22, 2010. Collette, M., M. Cooper, A. Mesbahi, and A. Incecik, “An integrated reliability, risk analysis, and cost model for preliminary structural design: a module of the SAFETY@SPEED design methodology,” In FAST 2005. Eighth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation. St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 June 2005. Collette, M. and A. Incecik, “ An approach for reliability‐based fatigue design of welded joints on aluminunn high‐speed vessels,” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 85 – 98, 2006. Hess, P., “Reliability‐based operational performance metrics for ship structures.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2002. Hoppe, H., “ Goal‐based standards—a new approach to the international regulation of ship construction,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 169 – 180, 2005. Koenig, P., D. Nalchajian, and J. Hootman, “ Ship service life and naval force structure,” Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 69 – 77, 2009. NATO, “ANEP 77 Naval Ship Code.” North Atlantic Treaty Organization, July 2010. OPNAV, “Operational Availability Handbook.” Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction, 1987. Rigo, P., “ Least‐cost structural optimization oriented preliminary design,” Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 17, pp. 202 – 215, 2001. Sage, A.P. and J.E. Armstrong Jr., Introduction to systems engineering, 1st ed., Wiley‐Interscience, New York, 2000. Sames, P.C. and R. Hamann, “ Towards environmental risk acceptance criteria,” In 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2008, June 9, 2008–June 13, 2008, Estoril, Portugal. ASME Vol. 2, pp. 277 – 283, 2008. Sielski, R., SSC‐452 Aluminum structure design and fabrication guide, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, 2007. Turan, O., A.İ. Ölçer, I. Lazakis, P. Rigo, and J.D. Caprace, “ Maintenance/repair and production‐oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage,” Ships and Offshore Structures, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 107 – 125, 2009. IndexNoFollow Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Engineering Article 2011 ftumdeepblue https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x 2023-07-31T21:14:00Z As modular weapon systems allow cost‐effective upgrades of a vessel's war‐fighting capability, the degradation of the difficult‐to‐upgrade structure of the vessel may soon become one of the key drivers of vessel retirement and lifecycle maintenance costing. Existing structural design approaches are reviewed, along with recent developments in this field. It is argued that recent research has produced a number of ad hoc metrics for structural design, such as producability; however, to truly address the needs of future ship design teams it is necessary to integrate several such metrics in a systems‐engineering view to evaluate how the structural system contributes to the overall capabilities and costs of a proposed vessel. Potential architectures for this approach are discussed, along with key shortcomings. A comparative example is given for structural fatigue of a strength deck under global bending loading, comparing the traditional design approach with a systems‐oriented view. Peer Reviewed http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90260/1/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x.pdf Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Michigan: Deep Blue Naval Engineers Journal 123 3 45 55

Similar Items