The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America

Aim Spatial turnover of species, or beta diversity, varies in relation to geographical distance and environmental conditions, as well as spatial scale. We evaluated the explanatory power of distance, climate and topography on beta diversity of mammalian faunas of North America in relation to latitud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Ecology and Biogeography
Main Authors: Qian, Hong, Badgley, Catherine E., Fox, David L.
Other Authors: Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, USA, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x
id ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/75718
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of Michigan: Deep Blue
op_collection_id ftumdeepblue
language unknown
topic Beta Diversity
Climate
Jaccard Index
Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Macroecology
Mammalian Faunas
Spatial Turnover
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Geology and Earth Sciences
Science
spellingShingle Beta Diversity
Climate
Jaccard Index
Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Macroecology
Mammalian Faunas
Spatial Turnover
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Geology and Earth Sciences
Science
Qian, Hong
Badgley, Catherine E.
Fox, David L.
The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
topic_facet Beta Diversity
Climate
Jaccard Index
Latitudinal Diversity Gradient
Macroecology
Mammalian Faunas
Spatial Turnover
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Geology and Earth Sciences
Science
description Aim Spatial turnover of species, or beta diversity, varies in relation to geographical distance and environmental conditions, as well as spatial scale. We evaluated the explanatory power of distance, climate and topography on beta diversity of mammalian faunas of North America in relation to latitude. Location North America north of Mexico. Methods The study area was divided into 313 equal-area quadrats (241 × 241 km). Faunal data for all continental mammals were compiled for these quadrats, which were divided among five latitudinal zones. These zones were comparable in terms of latitudinal and longitudinal span, climatic gradients and elevational gradients. We used the natural logarithm of the Jaccard index (ln J ) to measure species turnover between pairs of quadrats within each latitudinal zone. The slope of ln J in relation to distance was compared among latitudinal zones. We used partial regression to partition the variance in ln J into the components uniquely explained by distance and by environmental differences, as well as jointly by distance and environmental differences. Results Mammalian faunas of North America differ more from each other at lower latitudes than at higher latitudes. Regression models of ln J in relation to distance, climatic difference and topographic difference for each zone demonstrated that these variables have high explanatory power that diminishes with latitude. Beta diversity is higher for zones with higher mean annual temperature, lower seasonality of temperature and greater topographic complexity. For each latitudinal zone, distance and environmental differences explain a greater proportion of the variance in ln J than distance, climate or topography does separately. Main conclusions The latitudinal gradient in beta diversity of North American mammals corresponds to a macroclimatic gradient of decreasing mean annual temperature and increasing seasonality of temperature from south to north. Most of the variance in spatial turnover is explained by distance and environmental ...
author2 Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA,
Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, USA,
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Qian, Hong
Badgley, Catherine E.
Fox, David L.
author_facet Qian, Hong
Badgley, Catherine E.
Fox, David L.
author_sort Qian, Hong
title The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
title_short The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
title_full The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
title_fullStr The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
title_full_unstemmed The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America
title_sort latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in north america
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
publishDate 2009
url https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation Qian, Hong; Badgley, Catherine; Fox, David L. (2009). "The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America." Global Ecology and Biogeography 18(1): 111-122. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718>
1466-822X
1466-8238
https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718
doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Ahn, C.-H. & Tateishi, R. ( 1994 ) Development of a global 30-min grid potential evapotranspiration data set. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33, 12 – 21.
Arita, H.T. ( 1997 ) The non-volant mammal fauna of Mexico: species richness in a megadiverse country. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 787 – 795.
Badgley, C. & Fox, D.L. ( 2000 ) Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure in relation to environmental gradients. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 1437 – 1467.
Barbour, M.G. & Billings, W.D. ( 1999 ) North American terrestrial vegetation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Brown, R.J.E. ( 1960 ) The distribution of permafrost and its relation to air temperature in Canada and the U.S.S.R. Arctic, 13, 163 – 177.
Condit, R., Pitman, N., Leigh, E.G., Chave, J., Terborgh, J., Foster, R.B., NuÑez, P., Aguilar, S., Valencia, R., Villa, G., Muller-Landau, H.C., Losos, E. & Hubbell, S.P. ( 2002 ) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science, 295, 666 – 669.
Currie, D.J. ( 1991 ) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. The American Naturalist, 137, 27 – 49.
Dyer, L.A., Singer, M.S., Lill, J.T., Stireman, J.O., Gentry, G.L., Marquis, R.J., Ricklefs, R.E., Greeney, H.F., Wagner, D.L., Morais, H.C., Diniz, I.R., Kursar, T.A. & Coley, P.D. ( 2007 ) Host specificity of Lepidoptera in tropical and temperate forests. Nature, 448, 696 – 700.
Gaston, K.J. ( 2000 ) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405, 220 – 227.
Gaston, K.J., Davies, R.G., Orme, C.D.L., Olson, V.A., Thomas, G.H., Ding, T.-S., Rasmussen, P.C., Lennon, J.J., Bennett, P.M., Owens, I.P.F. & Blackburn, T.M. ( 2007 ) Spatial turnover in the global avifauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 1567 – 1574.
Hall, E.R. ( 1981 ) The mammals of North America, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York, NY.
Hawkins, B.A. & Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. ( 2004 ) ‘Latitude’ and geographic patterns in species richness. Ecography, 27, 268 – 272.
Hawkins, B.A. & Porter, E.E. ( 2003 ) Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 475 – 481.
HernÁndez FernÁndez, M. & Vrba, E.S. ( 2005 ) Rapoport effect and biomic specialization in African mammals: revisiting the climatic variability hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 903 – 918.
Hillebrand, H. ( 2004 ) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. The American Naturalist, 163, 192 – 211.
Hutchinson, G.E. ( 1959 ) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist, 93, 145 – 159.
Janis, C.M., Damuth, J. & Theodor, J.M. ( 2002 ) The origins and evolution of the North American grassland biome: the story from the hoofed mammals. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 177, 183 – 198.
Janzen, D.H. ( 1967 ) Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 101, 233 – 249.
Jernvall, J. & Fortelius, M. ( 2002 ) Common mammals drive the evolutionary increase of hypsodonty in the Neogene. Nature, 417, 538 – 540.
Kaufman, D.M. ( 1995 ) Diversity of New World mammals: universality of the latitudinal gradient of species and bauplans. Journal of Mammalogy, 76, 322 – 334.
Kaufman, D.M. & Willig, M.R. ( 1998 ) Latitudinal patterns of mammalian species richness in the New World: the effect of sampling method and faunal group. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 795 – 805.
Koleff, P., Lennon, J.J. & Gaston, K.J. ( 2003 ) Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 483 – 498.
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. ( 1998 ) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Legendre, P., Lapointe, F.-J. & Casgrain, P. ( 1994 ) Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution, 48, 1487 – 1499.
Mittelbach, G.G., Schemske, D.W., Cornell, H.V., Allen, A.P., Brown, J.M., Bush, M.B., Harrison, S.P., Hurlbert, A.H., Knowlton, N., Lessios, H.A., McCain, C.M., McCune, A.R., McDade, L.A., McPeek, M.A., Near, T.J., Price, T.D., Ricklefs, R.E., Roy, K., Sax, D.F., Schluter, D., Sobel, J.M. & Turelli, M. ( 2007 ) Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters, 10, 315 – 331.
Nekola, J.C. & White, P.S. ( 1999 ) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 867 – 878.
New, M., Hulme, M. & Jones, P. ( 1999 ) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate, 12, 829 – 856.
Pagel, M.D., May, R.M. & Collie, A.R. ( 1991 ) Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversity of mammalian species. The American Naturalist, 137, 791 – 815.
Pianka, E.R. ( 1966 ) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. The American Naturalist, 100, 33 – 46.
Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R.E. ( 2007 ) A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America. Ecology Letters, 10, 737 – 744.
Qian, H., Ricklefs, R.E. & White, P.S. ( 2005 ) Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecology Letters, 8, 15 – 22.
RodrÍguez, P. & Arita, H.T. ( 2004 ) Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation. Ecography, 27, 547 – 556.
Rohde, K. ( 1992 ) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514 – 527.
Rosenzweig, M.L. ( 1995 ) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Simpson, G.G. ( 1964 ) Species density of North American recent mammals. Systematic Zoology, 13, 57 – 73.
Soininen, J., McDonald, R. & Hillebrand, H. ( 2007 ) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography, 30, 3 – 12.
Stevens, G.C. ( 1989 ) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240 – 256.
Stevens, R.D. & Willig, M.R. ( 2002 ) Geographical ecology at the community level: perspectives on the diversity of New World bats. Ecology, 83, 545 – 560.
Storch, D., Evans, K.L. & Gaston, K.J. ( 2005 ) The species-area-energy relationship. Ecology Letters, 8, 487 – 492.
Svenning, J.-C. & Skov, F. ( 2004 ) Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecology Letters, 7, 565 – 573.
Whittaker, R.H. ( 1977 ) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evolutionary Biology, 10, 1 – 67.
Willig, M.R., Kaufman, D.M. & Stevens, R.D. ( 2003 ) Latitudinal gradients in biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 273 – 309.
Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. ( 1993 ) Mammal Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Youngman, P.M. ( 1975 ) Mammals of the Yukon Territory. Publications in Zoology, No. 10. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
op_rights Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x
container_title Global Ecology and Biogeography
container_volume 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 111
op_container_end_page 122
_version_ 1774713597407002624
spelling ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/75718 2023-08-20T04:03:11+02:00 The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America Qian, Hong Badgley, Catherine E. Fox, David L. Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 1109 Geddes Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum, 1011 East Ash Street, Springfield, IL 62703, USA, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Minnesota, 310 Pillsbury Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA 2009-01 494757 bytes 3109 bytes application/pdf text/plain https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x unknown Blackwell Publishing Ltd Qian, Hong; Badgley, Catherine; Fox, David L. (2009). "The latitudinal gradient of beta diversity in relation to climate and topography for mammals in North America." Global Ecology and Biogeography 18(1): 111-122. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718> 1466-822X 1466-8238 https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/75718 doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x Global Ecology and Biogeography Ahn, C.-H. & Tateishi, R. ( 1994 ) Development of a global 30-min grid potential evapotranspiration data set. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33, 12 – 21. Arita, H.T. ( 1997 ) The non-volant mammal fauna of Mexico: species richness in a megadiverse country. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 787 – 795. Badgley, C. & Fox, D.L. ( 2000 ) Ecological biogeography of North American mammals: species density and ecological structure in relation to environmental gradients. Journal of Biogeography, 27, 1437 – 1467. Barbour, M.G. & Billings, W.D. ( 1999 ) North American terrestrial vegetation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Brown, R.J.E. ( 1960 ) The distribution of permafrost and its relation to air temperature in Canada and the U.S.S.R. Arctic, 13, 163 – 177. Condit, R., Pitman, N., Leigh, E.G., Chave, J., Terborgh, J., Foster, R.B., NuÑez, P., Aguilar, S., Valencia, R., Villa, G., Muller-Landau, H.C., Losos, E. & Hubbell, S.P. ( 2002 ) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science, 295, 666 – 669. Currie, D.J. ( 1991 ) Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. The American Naturalist, 137, 27 – 49. Dyer, L.A., Singer, M.S., Lill, J.T., Stireman, J.O., Gentry, G.L., Marquis, R.J., Ricklefs, R.E., Greeney, H.F., Wagner, D.L., Morais, H.C., Diniz, I.R., Kursar, T.A. & Coley, P.D. ( 2007 ) Host specificity of Lepidoptera in tropical and temperate forests. Nature, 448, 696 – 700. Gaston, K.J. ( 2000 ) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature, 405, 220 – 227. Gaston, K.J., Davies, R.G., Orme, C.D.L., Olson, V.A., Thomas, G.H., Ding, T.-S., Rasmussen, P.C., Lennon, J.J., Bennett, P.M., Owens, I.P.F. & Blackburn, T.M. ( 2007 ) Spatial turnover in the global avifauna. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 274, 1567 – 1574. Hall, E.R. ( 1981 ) The mammals of North America, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York, NY. Hawkins, B.A. & Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. ( 2004 ) ‘Latitude’ and geographic patterns in species richness. Ecography, 27, 268 – 272. Hawkins, B.A. & Porter, E.E. ( 2003 ) Relative influences of current and historical factors on mammal and bird diversity patterns in deglaciated North America. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 475 – 481. HernÁndez FernÁndez, M. & Vrba, E.S. ( 2005 ) Rapoport effect and biomic specialization in African mammals: revisiting the climatic variability hypothesis. Journal of Biogeography, 32, 903 – 918. Hillebrand, H. ( 2004 ) On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. The American Naturalist, 163, 192 – 211. Hutchinson, G.E. ( 1959 ) Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? The American Naturalist, 93, 145 – 159. Janis, C.M., Damuth, J. & Theodor, J.M. ( 2002 ) The origins and evolution of the North American grassland biome: the story from the hoofed mammals. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 177, 183 – 198. Janzen, D.H. ( 1967 ) Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 101, 233 – 249. Jernvall, J. & Fortelius, M. ( 2002 ) Common mammals drive the evolutionary increase of hypsodonty in the Neogene. Nature, 417, 538 – 540. Kaufman, D.M. ( 1995 ) Diversity of New World mammals: universality of the latitudinal gradient of species and bauplans. Journal of Mammalogy, 76, 322 – 334. Kaufman, D.M. & Willig, M.R. ( 1998 ) Latitudinal patterns of mammalian species richness in the New World: the effect of sampling method and faunal group. Journal of Biogeography, 25, 795 – 805. Koleff, P., Lennon, J.J. & Gaston, K.J. ( 2003 ) Are there latitudinal gradients in species turnover? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 12, 483 – 498. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. ( 1998 ) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Legendre, P., Lapointe, F.-J. & Casgrain, P. ( 1994 ) Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution, 48, 1487 – 1499. Mittelbach, G.G., Schemske, D.W., Cornell, H.V., Allen, A.P., Brown, J.M., Bush, M.B., Harrison, S.P., Hurlbert, A.H., Knowlton, N., Lessios, H.A., McCain, C.M., McCune, A.R., McDade, L.A., McPeek, M.A., Near, T.J., Price, T.D., Ricklefs, R.E., Roy, K., Sax, D.F., Schluter, D., Sobel, J.M. & Turelli, M. ( 2007 ) Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecology Letters, 10, 315 – 331. Nekola, J.C. & White, P.S. ( 1999 ) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography, 26, 867 – 878. New, M., Hulme, M. & Jones, P. ( 1999 ) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961–90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. Journal of Climate, 12, 829 – 856. Pagel, M.D., May, R.M. & Collie, A.R. ( 1991 ) Ecological aspects of the geographical distribution and diversity of mammalian species. The American Naturalist, 137, 791 – 815. Pianka, E.R. ( 1966 ) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. The American Naturalist, 100, 33 – 46. Qian, H. & Ricklefs, R.E. ( 2007 ) A latitudinal gradient in large-scale beta diversity for vascular plants in North America. Ecology Letters, 10, 737 – 744. Qian, H., Ricklefs, R.E. & White, P.S. ( 2005 ) Beta diversity of angiosperms in temperate floras of eastern Asia and eastern North America. Ecology Letters, 8, 15 – 22. RodrÍguez, P. & Arita, H.T. ( 2004 ) Beta diversity and latitude in North American mammals: testing the hypothesis of covariation. Ecography, 27, 547 – 556. Rohde, K. ( 1992 ) Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause. Oikos, 65, 514 – 527. Rosenzweig, M.L. ( 1995 ) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Simpson, G.G. ( 1964 ) Species density of North American recent mammals. Systematic Zoology, 13, 57 – 73. Soininen, J., McDonald, R. & Hillebrand, H. ( 2007 ) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography, 30, 3 – 12. Stevens, G.C. ( 1989 ) The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133, 240 – 256. Stevens, R.D. & Willig, M.R. ( 2002 ) Geographical ecology at the community level: perspectives on the diversity of New World bats. Ecology, 83, 545 – 560. Storch, D., Evans, K.L. & Gaston, K.J. ( 2005 ) The species-area-energy relationship. Ecology Letters, 8, 487 – 492. Svenning, J.-C. & Skov, F. ( 2004 ) Limited filling of the potential range in European tree species. Ecology Letters, 7, 565 – 573. Whittaker, R.H. ( 1977 ) Evolution of species diversity in land communities. Evolutionary Biology, 10, 1 – 67. Willig, M.R., Kaufman, D.M. & Stevens, R.D. ( 2003 ) Latitudinal gradients in biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34, 273 – 309. Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. ( 1993 ) Mammal Species of the World: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 2nd edn. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. Youngman, P.M. ( 1975 ) Mammals of the Yukon Territory. Publications in Zoology, No. 10. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Beta Diversity Climate Jaccard Index Latitudinal Diversity Gradient Macroecology Mammalian Faunas Spatial Turnover Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Geology and Earth Sciences Science Article 2009 ftumdeepblue https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00415.x 2023-07-31T21:16:35Z Aim Spatial turnover of species, or beta diversity, varies in relation to geographical distance and environmental conditions, as well as spatial scale. We evaluated the explanatory power of distance, climate and topography on beta diversity of mammalian faunas of North America in relation to latitude. Location North America north of Mexico. Methods The study area was divided into 313 equal-area quadrats (241 × 241 km). Faunal data for all continental mammals were compiled for these quadrats, which were divided among five latitudinal zones. These zones were comparable in terms of latitudinal and longitudinal span, climatic gradients and elevational gradients. We used the natural logarithm of the Jaccard index (ln J ) to measure species turnover between pairs of quadrats within each latitudinal zone. The slope of ln J in relation to distance was compared among latitudinal zones. We used partial regression to partition the variance in ln J into the components uniquely explained by distance and by environmental differences, as well as jointly by distance and environmental differences. Results Mammalian faunas of North America differ more from each other at lower latitudes than at higher latitudes. Regression models of ln J in relation to distance, climatic difference and topographic difference for each zone demonstrated that these variables have high explanatory power that diminishes with latitude. Beta diversity is higher for zones with higher mean annual temperature, lower seasonality of temperature and greater topographic complexity. For each latitudinal zone, distance and environmental differences explain a greater proportion of the variance in ln J than distance, climate or topography does separately. Main conclusions The latitudinal gradient in beta diversity of North American mammals corresponds to a macroclimatic gradient of decreasing mean annual temperature and increasing seasonality of temperature from south to north. Most of the variance in spatial turnover is explained by distance and environmental ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Michigan: Deep Blue Global Ecology and Biogeography 18 1 111 122