The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty

Peer Reviewed https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/1/bes21349.pdf https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/2/bes21349_am.pdf

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Main Authors: McNulty, Stacy A., White, David, Hufty, Mary, Foster, Paul
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: University of Chicago Press 2017
Subjects:
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Science
Arctic
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138850
https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1349
id ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/138850
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection University of Michigan: Deep Blue
op_collection_id ftumdeepblue
language unknown
topic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Science
spellingShingle Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Science
McNulty, Stacy A.
White, David
Hufty, Mary
Foster, Paul
The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
topic_facet Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Science
description Peer Reviewed https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/1/bes21349.pdf https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/2/bes21349_am.pdf
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author McNulty, Stacy A.
White, David
Hufty, Mary
Foster, Paul
author_facet McNulty, Stacy A.
White, David
Hufty, Mary
Foster, Paul
author_sort McNulty, Stacy A.
title The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
title_short The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
title_full The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
title_fullStr The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
title_full_unstemmed The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty
title_sort organization of biological field stations at fifty
publisher University of Chicago Press
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138850
https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1349
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation McNulty, Stacy A.; White, David; Hufty, Mary; Foster, Paul (2017). "The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty." The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America (4): 359-373.
0012-9623
2327-6096
https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138850
doi:10.1002/bes2.1349
The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
Stanford, J., and A. McKee. 1999. Field Station 2000 Initiative: results of a Workshop Held May 17–22, 1998 at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California. Organization of Biological Field Stations. Publication no. 2.
Hodder, J. 2009. What are undergraduates doing at biological field stations and marine laboratories? BioScience 59: 666 – 672.
Johnson, J. C., R. R. Christian, J. W. Brunt, C. R. Hickman, and R. B. Waide. 2010. Evolution of collaboration within the US long term ecological research network. BioScience 60: 931 – 940.
Klug, M. J., J. Hodder, and H. Swain. 2002. The role of biological field stations in education and recruitment into the biological sciences. Report of a Workshop, “Education and Recruitment into the Biological Sciences: Potential Role of Field Station and Marine Laboratories”, Washington, D.C. http://www.obfs.org/assets/docs/fieldstation-report2002.pdf
Lohr, S. A., P. G. Connors, J. A. Stanford, and J. S. Clegg. 1995. A new horizon for biological field stations and marine laboratories. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory Miscellaneous Publication No. 3.
Michener, W. K., K. L. Bildstein, A. McKee, R. R. Parmenter, W. W. Hargrove, D. McClearn, and M. Stromberg. 2009. Biological field stations: research legacies and sites for serendipity. BioScience 59: 300 – 310.
National Research Council. 2014. Enhancing the value and sustainability of field stations and marine laboratories in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Enhancing-Value-Sustainability/18806
Organization of Biological Field Stations. 2016. Discoveries at Field Stations. http://www.obfs.org/discoveries. Accessed July 13, 2017.
Organization of Inland Biological Stations. 1966a. Inland biological stations newsletter. No. 2.
Organization of Inland Biological Stations. 1966b. Inland biological stations newsletter. No. 1.
Porter, J. H., E. Nagy, T. K. Kratz, P. Hanson, S. L. Collins, and P. Arzberger. 2009. New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology. BioScience 59: 385 – 397.
Tydecks, L., V. Bremerich, I. Jentschke, G. E. Likens, and K. Tockner. 2016. Biological field stations: a global infrastructure for research, education, and public engagement. BioScience 66: 1 – 8.
Vanderbilt, K., and E. Gaiser. 2017. The international long‐term ecological network. A platform for collaboration. Ecosphere 8: e01697. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1697
Vernberg, F. J., et al. 1963. Field stations of the United States. American Zoologist 3: 245 – 386.
Whitesell, S., R. J. Lilieholm, and T. L. Sharik. 2002. A global survey of tropical biological field stations. BioScience 52: 55 – 64.
Wilson, E. O. 1982. The importance of biological field stations. BioScience 5: 320.
Wyman, R. L., E. Wallensky, and M. Baine. 2009. The activities and importance of international field stations. BioScience 59: 584 – 592.
Arvey, M. D. 1964. National agency programs and support of arctic biology in the United States. BioScience 14: 26 – 27.
Arvey, M. D., and W. I. Riemer. 1966. Inland biological field stations of the United States. BioScience 16: 249 – 254.
Baker, B. 2015. The way forward for biological field stations. BioScience 65: 123 – 129.
Barrows, C. W., M. L. Murphy‐Mariscal, and R. R. Hernandez. 2016. At a crossroads: the nature of natural history in the twenty‐first century. BioScience 66: 592 – 599.
Billick, I., and M. V. Price. 2010. The ecology of place: contributions of place‐based research to ecological understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Billick, I., I. Babb, B. Kloeppel, J. C. Leong, J. Hodder, J. Sanders, and H. Swain. 2013. Field stations and marine laboratories of the future: a strategic vision. National Association of Marine Laboratories and Organization of Biological Field Stations. http://www.obfs.org/assets/docs/fsml_final_report.pdf
Brunt, J. W., and W. K. Michener. 2009. The resource discovery initiative for field stations: enhancing data management at North American biological field stations. BioScience 59: 482 – 487.
Clancy, K. B. H., R. G. Nelson, J. N. Rutherford, and K. Hinde. 2014. Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS ONE 9: e102172.
Fleischner, T. L., et al. 2017. Teaching biology in the field: importance, challenges, and solutions. BioScience 67: 558 – 567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036
Fukami, T. 2013. Integrating inquiry‐based teaching with faculty research. Science 339: 1536 – 1537.
Hampton, S. E., C. A. Strasser, J. J. Tewksbury, W. K. Gram, A. E. Budden, A. L. Batcheller, C. S. Duke, and J. H. Porter. 2013. Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 156 – 162.
op_rights IndexNoFollow
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.134910.1002/ecs2.169710.1093/biosci/bix036
container_title The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America
container_volume 98
container_issue 4
container_start_page 359
op_container_end_page 373
_version_ 1774713590795730944
spelling ftumdeepblue:oai:deepblue.lib.umich.edu:2027.42/138850 2023-08-20T04:03:11+02:00 The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty McNulty, Stacy A. White, David Hufty, Mary Foster, Paul 2017-10 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138850 https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1349 unknown University of Chicago Press Wiley Periodicals, Inc. McNulty, Stacy A.; White, David; Hufty, Mary; Foster, Paul (2017). "The Organization of Biological Field Stations at Fifty." The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America (4): 359-373. 0012-9623 2327-6096 https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138850 doi:10.1002/bes2.1349 The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America Stanford, J., and A. McKee. 1999. Field Station 2000 Initiative: results of a Workshop Held May 17–22, 1998 at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California. Organization of Biological Field Stations. Publication no. 2. Hodder, J. 2009. What are undergraduates doing at biological field stations and marine laboratories? BioScience 59: 666 – 672. Johnson, J. C., R. R. Christian, J. W. Brunt, C. R. Hickman, and R. B. Waide. 2010. Evolution of collaboration within the US long term ecological research network. BioScience 60: 931 – 940. Klug, M. J., J. Hodder, and H. Swain. 2002. The role of biological field stations in education and recruitment into the biological sciences. Report of a Workshop, “Education and Recruitment into the Biological Sciences: Potential Role of Field Station and Marine Laboratories”, Washington, D.C. http://www.obfs.org/assets/docs/fieldstation-report2002.pdf Lohr, S. A., P. G. Connors, J. A. Stanford, and J. S. Clegg. 1995. A new horizon for biological field stations and marine laboratories. Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory Miscellaneous Publication No. 3. Michener, W. K., K. L. Bildstein, A. McKee, R. R. Parmenter, W. W. Hargrove, D. McClearn, and M. Stromberg. 2009. Biological field stations: research legacies and sites for serendipity. BioScience 59: 300 – 310. National Research Council. 2014. Enhancing the value and sustainability of field stations and marine laboratories in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Enhancing-Value-Sustainability/18806 Organization of Biological Field Stations. 2016. Discoveries at Field Stations. http://www.obfs.org/discoveries. Accessed July 13, 2017. Organization of Inland Biological Stations. 1966a. Inland biological stations newsletter. No. 2. Organization of Inland Biological Stations. 1966b. Inland biological stations newsletter. No. 1. Porter, J. H., E. Nagy, T. K. Kratz, P. Hanson, S. L. Collins, and P. Arzberger. 2009. New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology. BioScience 59: 385 – 397. Tydecks, L., V. Bremerich, I. Jentschke, G. E. Likens, and K. Tockner. 2016. Biological field stations: a global infrastructure for research, education, and public engagement. BioScience 66: 1 – 8. Vanderbilt, K., and E. Gaiser. 2017. The international long‐term ecological network. A platform for collaboration. Ecosphere 8: e01697. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1697 Vernberg, F. J., et al. 1963. Field stations of the United States. American Zoologist 3: 245 – 386. Whitesell, S., R. J. Lilieholm, and T. L. Sharik. 2002. A global survey of tropical biological field stations. BioScience 52: 55 – 64. Wilson, E. O. 1982. The importance of biological field stations. BioScience 5: 320. Wyman, R. L., E. Wallensky, and M. Baine. 2009. The activities and importance of international field stations. BioScience 59: 584 – 592. Arvey, M. D. 1964. National agency programs and support of arctic biology in the United States. BioScience 14: 26 – 27. Arvey, M. D., and W. I. Riemer. 1966. Inland biological field stations of the United States. BioScience 16: 249 – 254. Baker, B. 2015. The way forward for biological field stations. BioScience 65: 123 – 129. Barrows, C. W., M. L. Murphy‐Mariscal, and R. R. Hernandez. 2016. At a crossroads: the nature of natural history in the twenty‐first century. BioScience 66: 592 – 599. Billick, I., and M. V. Price. 2010. The ecology of place: contributions of place‐based research to ecological understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Billick, I., I. Babb, B. Kloeppel, J. C. Leong, J. Hodder, J. Sanders, and H. Swain. 2013. Field stations and marine laboratories of the future: a strategic vision. National Association of Marine Laboratories and Organization of Biological Field Stations. http://www.obfs.org/assets/docs/fsml_final_report.pdf Brunt, J. W., and W. K. Michener. 2009. The resource discovery initiative for field stations: enhancing data management at North American biological field stations. BioScience 59: 482 – 487. Clancy, K. B. H., R. G. Nelson, J. N. Rutherford, and K. Hinde. 2014. Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS ONE 9: e102172. Fleischner, T. L., et al. 2017. Teaching biology in the field: importance, challenges, and solutions. BioScience 67: 558 – 567. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix036 Fukami, T. 2013. Integrating inquiry‐based teaching with faculty research. Science 339: 1536 – 1537. Hampton, S. E., C. A. Strasser, J. J. Tewksbury, W. K. Gram, A. E. Budden, A. L. Batcheller, C. S. Duke, and J. H. Porter. 2013. Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 156 – 162. IndexNoFollow Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Science Article 2017 ftumdeepblue https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.134910.1002/ecs2.169710.1093/biosci/bix036 2023-07-31T20:42:45Z Peer Reviewed https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/1/bes21349.pdf https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138850/2/bes21349_am.pdf Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic University of Michigan: Deep Blue The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 98 4 359 373

Similar Items