Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf

The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Foulds, Amy, Allen, Grant, Shaw, Jacob T., Bateson, Prudence, Barker, Patrick A., Huang, Langwen, Pitt, Joseph R., Lee, James D., Wilde, Shona E., Dominutti, Pamela, Purvis, Ruth M., Lowry, David, France, James L., Fisher, Rebecca E., Fiehn, Alina, Pühl, Magdalena, Bauguitte, Stéphane J. B., Conley, Stephen A., Smith, Mackenzie L., Lachlan-Cope, Tom, Pisso, Ignacio, Schwietzke, Stefan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872
id ftumanchesterpub:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b
record_format openpolar
spelling ftumanchesterpub:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b 2024-04-28T08:32:55+00:00 Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf Foulds, Amy Allen, Grant Shaw, Jacob T. Bateson, Prudence Barker, Patrick A. Huang, Langwen Pitt, Joseph R. Lee, James D. Wilde, Shona E. Dominutti, Pamela Purvis, Ruth M. Lowry, David France, James L. Fisher, Rebecca E. Fiehn, Alina Pühl, Magdalena Bauguitte, Stéphane J. B. Conley, Stephen A. Smith, Mackenzie L. Lachlan-Cope, Tom Pisso, Ignacio Schwietzke, Stefan 2022 https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872 eng eng https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Foulds , A , Allen , G , Shaw , J T , Bateson , P , Barker , P A , Huang , L , Pitt , J R , Lee , J D , Wilde , S E , Dominutti , P , Purvis , R M , Lowry , D , France , J L , Fisher , R E , Fiehn , A , Pühl , M , Bauguitte , S J B , Conley , S A , Smith , M L , Lachlan-Cope , T , Pisso , I & Schwietzke , S 2022 , ' Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf ' , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics . https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872 , https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872 article 2022 ftumanchesterpub https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872 2024-04-08T14:19:51Z The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&G facilities collected in 10 O&G fields over two regions of the Norwegian Continental Shelf in 2019. Emissions of CH4 derived from measurements during 13 aircraft surveys were found to range from 2.6 to 1200 t year-1 (with a mean of 211 t year-1 across all 21 facilities). Comparing this with aggregated operator-reported facility emissions for 2019, we found excellent agreement (within 1σ uncertainty), with mean aircraft-measured fluxes only 16% lower than those reported by operators. We also compared aircraft-derived fluxes with facility fluxes extracted from a global gridded fossil fuel CH4 emission inventory compiled for 2016. We found that the measured emissions were 42% larger than the inventory for the area covered by this study, for the 21 facilities surveyed (in aggregate). We interpret this large discrepancy not to reflect a systematic error in the operator-reported emissions, which agree with measurements, but rather the representivity of the global inventory due to the methodology used to construct it and the fact that the inventory was compiled for 2016 (and thus not representative of emissions in 2019). This highlights the need for timely and up-to-date inventories for use in research and policy. The variable nature of CH4 emissions from individual facilities requires knowledge of facility operational status during measurements for data to be useful in prioritizing targeted emission mitigation solutions. Future surveys of individual facilities would benefit from knowledge of facility operational status over time. Field-specific aggregated emissions (and uncertainty statistics), as presented here for the Norwegian Sea, can be meaningfully estimated from intensive aircraft surveys. However, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Norwegian Sea The University of Manchester: Research Explorer
institution Open Polar
collection The University of Manchester: Research Explorer
op_collection_id ftumanchesterpub
language English
description The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&G facilities collected in 10 O&G fields over two regions of the Norwegian Continental Shelf in 2019. Emissions of CH4 derived from measurements during 13 aircraft surveys were found to range from 2.6 to 1200 t year-1 (with a mean of 211 t year-1 across all 21 facilities). Comparing this with aggregated operator-reported facility emissions for 2019, we found excellent agreement (within 1σ uncertainty), with mean aircraft-measured fluxes only 16% lower than those reported by operators. We also compared aircraft-derived fluxes with facility fluxes extracted from a global gridded fossil fuel CH4 emission inventory compiled for 2016. We found that the measured emissions were 42% larger than the inventory for the area covered by this study, for the 21 facilities surveyed (in aggregate). We interpret this large discrepancy not to reflect a systematic error in the operator-reported emissions, which agree with measurements, but rather the representivity of the global inventory due to the methodology used to construct it and the fact that the inventory was compiled for 2016 (and thus not representative of emissions in 2019). This highlights the need for timely and up-to-date inventories for use in research and policy. The variable nature of CH4 emissions from individual facilities requires knowledge of facility operational status during measurements for data to be useful in prioritizing targeted emission mitigation solutions. Future surveys of individual facilities would benefit from knowledge of facility operational status over time. Field-specific aggregated emissions (and uncertainty statistics), as presented here for the Norwegian Sea, can be meaningfully estimated from intensive aircraft surveys. However, ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob T.
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick A.
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph R.
Lee, James D.
Wilde, Shona E.
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth M.
Lowry, David
France, James L.
Fisher, Rebecca E.
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane J. B.
Conley, Stephen A.
Smith, Mackenzie L.
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
spellingShingle Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob T.
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick A.
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph R.
Lee, James D.
Wilde, Shona E.
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth M.
Lowry, David
France, James L.
Fisher, Rebecca E.
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane J. B.
Conley, Stephen A.
Smith, Mackenzie L.
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
author_facet Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob T.
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick A.
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph R.
Lee, James D.
Wilde, Shona E.
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth M.
Lowry, David
France, James L.
Fisher, Rebecca E.
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane J. B.
Conley, Stephen A.
Smith, Mackenzie L.
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
author_sort Foulds, Amy
title Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
title_short Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
title_full Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
title_fullStr Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
title_full_unstemmed Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
title_sort quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the norwegian continental shelf
publishDate 2022
url https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872
genre Norwegian Sea
genre_facet Norwegian Sea
op_source Foulds , A , Allen , G , Shaw , J T , Bateson , P , Barker , P A , Huang , L , Pitt , J R , Lee , J D , Wilde , S E , Dominutti , P , Purvis , R M , Lowry , D , France , J L , Fisher , R E , Fiehn , A , Pühl , M , Bauguitte , S J B , Conley , S A , Smith , M L , Lachlan-Cope , T , Pisso , I & Schwietzke , S 2022 , ' Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf ' , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics . https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872 , https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872
op_relation https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/b0f1f4e5-1975-47fd-92ca-ab4819c2bf7b
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-872
_version_ 1797589931815600128