Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign
Measurements from four case studies in spring and summer-time Arctic stratocumulus clouds during the Aerosol–Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic (AC- CACIA) campaign are presented. We compare microphysics observations between 5 cases and with previous measurements made in the Arcti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/a8688e59-54c3-42de-b9ac-821f652ca4d8 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 |
id |
ftumanchesterpub:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a8688e59-54c3-42de-b9ac-821f652ca4d8 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftumanchesterpub:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/a8688e59-54c3-42de-b9ac-821f652ca4d8 2023-11-12T04:08:31+01:00 Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign Lloyd, G. Choularton, Thomas Bower, Keith Crosier, Jonathan Jones, H. Dorsey, James Gallagher, M. W. Connolly, Paul Kirchgaessner, A. C. R. Lachlan-Cope, T. 2014-11-19 https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/a8688e59-54c3-42de-b9ac-821f652ca4d8 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Lloyd , G , Choularton , T , Bower , K , Crosier , J , Jones , H , Dorsey , J , Gallagher , M W , Connolly , P , Kirchgaessner , A C R & Lachlan-Cope , T 2014 , ' Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign ' , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions , pp. 28757-28807 . https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 Arctic clouds cloud microphysics ACCACIA airborne cloud spectrometers CDP CAPS CIP FAAM. Hallet Mossop Ice Stratocumulus article 2014 ftumanchesterpub https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 2023-10-30T09:12:58Z Measurements from four case studies in spring and summer-time Arctic stratocumulus clouds during the Aerosol–Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic (AC- CACIA) campaign are presented. We compare microphysics observations between 5 cases and with previous measurements made in the Arctic and Antarctic. During AC- CACIA, stratocumulus clouds were observed to consist of liquid at cloud tops, often at distinct temperature inversions. The cloud top regions precipitated low concentrations of ice into the cloud below. During the spring cases median ice number concentra- tions (∼0.5L−1) were found to be lower by about a factor of 5 than observations from 10 the summer campaign (∼3L−1). Cloud layers in the summer spanned a warmer tem- perature regime than in the spring and enhancement of ice concentrations in these cases was found to be due to secondary ice production through the Hallett–Mossop (H–M) process. Aerosol concentrations during spring ranged from ∼ 300–400 cm−3 in one case to lower values of ∼50–100 cm−3 in the other. The concentration of aerosol 15 with sizes, Dp > 0.5 μm, was used in a primary ice nucleus (IN) prediction scheme, DeMott et al. (2010). Predicted IN values varied depending on aerosol measurement periods, but were generally greater than maximum observed median values of ice crys- tal concentrations in the spring cases, and less than the observed ice concentrations in the summer due to the influence of secondary ice production. Comparison with re- 20 cent cloud observations in the Antarctic summer (Grosvenor et al., 2012), reveals lower ice concentrations in Antarctic clouds in comparable seasons. An enhancement of ice crystal number concentrations (when compared with predicted IN numbers) was also found in Antarctic stratocumulus clouds spanning the Hallett–Mossop (H–M) temper- ature zone, but concentrations were about an order of magnitude lower than those 25 observed in the Arctic summer cases, but were similar to the peak values observed in the colder Arctic spring cases, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Arctic The University of Manchester: Research Explorer Antarctic Arctic Hallet ENVELOPE(6.662,6.662,63.003,63.003) Hallett ENVELOPE(170.217,170.217,-72.317,-72.317) The Antarctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
The University of Manchester: Research Explorer |
op_collection_id |
ftumanchesterpub |
language |
English |
topic |
Arctic clouds cloud microphysics ACCACIA airborne cloud spectrometers CDP CAPS CIP FAAM. Hallet Mossop Ice Stratocumulus |
spellingShingle |
Arctic clouds cloud microphysics ACCACIA airborne cloud spectrometers CDP CAPS CIP FAAM. Hallet Mossop Ice Stratocumulus Lloyd, G. Choularton, Thomas Bower, Keith Crosier, Jonathan Jones, H. Dorsey, James Gallagher, M. W. Connolly, Paul Kirchgaessner, A. C. R. Lachlan-Cope, T. Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
topic_facet |
Arctic clouds cloud microphysics ACCACIA airborne cloud spectrometers CDP CAPS CIP FAAM. Hallet Mossop Ice Stratocumulus |
description |
Measurements from four case studies in spring and summer-time Arctic stratocumulus clouds during the Aerosol–Cloud Coupling And Climate Interactions in the Arctic (AC- CACIA) campaign are presented. We compare microphysics observations between 5 cases and with previous measurements made in the Arctic and Antarctic. During AC- CACIA, stratocumulus clouds were observed to consist of liquid at cloud tops, often at distinct temperature inversions. The cloud top regions precipitated low concentrations of ice into the cloud below. During the spring cases median ice number concentra- tions (∼0.5L−1) were found to be lower by about a factor of 5 than observations from 10 the summer campaign (∼3L−1). Cloud layers in the summer spanned a warmer tem- perature regime than in the spring and enhancement of ice concentrations in these cases was found to be due to secondary ice production through the Hallett–Mossop (H–M) process. Aerosol concentrations during spring ranged from ∼ 300–400 cm−3 in one case to lower values of ∼50–100 cm−3 in the other. The concentration of aerosol 15 with sizes, Dp > 0.5 μm, was used in a primary ice nucleus (IN) prediction scheme, DeMott et al. (2010). Predicted IN values varied depending on aerosol measurement periods, but were generally greater than maximum observed median values of ice crys- tal concentrations in the spring cases, and less than the observed ice concentrations in the summer due to the influence of secondary ice production. Comparison with re- 20 cent cloud observations in the Antarctic summer (Grosvenor et al., 2012), reveals lower ice concentrations in Antarctic clouds in comparable seasons. An enhancement of ice crystal number concentrations (when compared with predicted IN numbers) was also found in Antarctic stratocumulus clouds spanning the Hallett–Mossop (H–M) temper- ature zone, but concentrations were about an order of magnitude lower than those 25 observed in the Arctic summer cases, but were similar to the peak values observed in the colder Arctic spring cases, ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Lloyd, G. Choularton, Thomas Bower, Keith Crosier, Jonathan Jones, H. Dorsey, James Gallagher, M. W. Connolly, Paul Kirchgaessner, A. C. R. Lachlan-Cope, T. |
author_facet |
Lloyd, G. Choularton, Thomas Bower, Keith Crosier, Jonathan Jones, H. Dorsey, James Gallagher, M. W. Connolly, Paul Kirchgaessner, A. C. R. Lachlan-Cope, T. |
author_sort |
Lloyd, G. |
title |
Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
title_short |
Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
title_full |
Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
title_fullStr |
Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
title_full_unstemmed |
Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign |
title_sort |
observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime arctic stratocumulus during the accacia campaign |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/a8688e59-54c3-42de-b9ac-821f652ca4d8 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(6.662,6.662,63.003,63.003) ENVELOPE(170.217,170.217,-72.317,-72.317) |
geographic |
Antarctic Arctic Hallet Hallett The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Arctic Hallet Hallett The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Arctic |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Arctic |
op_source |
Lloyd , G , Choularton , T , Bower , K , Crosier , J , Jones , H , Dorsey , J , Gallagher , M W , Connolly , P , Kirchgaessner , A C R & Lachlan-Cope , T 2014 , ' Observations and comparisons of cloud microphysical properties in spring and summertime Arctic stratocumulus during the ACCACIA campaign ' , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions , pp. 28757-28807 . https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-28757-2014 |
_version_ |
1782328792415469568 |