The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada

In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Allia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ritzén, Ruben
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:Swedish
Published: Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353
id ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:8876353
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:8876353 2023-07-30T04:03:31+02:00 The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada Ritzén, Ruben 2016 application/pdf http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 swe swe Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 Social Anthropology Fracking Constructions of nature Post-colonialism First Nations Cultural Sciences Social Sciences M2 2016 ftulundlupsp 2023-07-11T20:07:29Z In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance (NBASGA) and the fossil fuel company Southwestern Energy Resources Canada) view nature in different ways. Statements from all three actors are analysed through a loose application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. The three actors and their corresponding views of nature are also compared with each other using Gingrich and Fox’s (2002) postmodern comparation techniques as a starting point. By mapping out these discourses I hope to understand both how the actors in the debate ground their arguments in differing nature views and comprehend why the New Brunswick debate was markedly more aggressive compared to other recent fracking debates. I conclude that the three actors’ constructions of nature are both different and similar when compared. SWN Resources and NBASGA both primarily argue from a view of nature where humanity/society and the natural sphere are completely separate. However, SWN Resources’ view of nature has a colonial angle, whereas NBASGA see nature as a human right worthy of protection. Finally, Elsipogtog view nature as both holy and intimately connected to the human through a symbiotic relationship. Other/Unknown Material First Nations Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP)
op_collection_id ftulundlupsp
language Swedish
topic Social Anthropology
Fracking
Constructions of nature
Post-colonialism
First Nations
Cultural Sciences
Social Sciences
spellingShingle Social Anthropology
Fracking
Constructions of nature
Post-colonialism
First Nations
Cultural Sciences
Social Sciences
Ritzén, Ruben
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
topic_facet Social Anthropology
Fracking
Constructions of nature
Post-colonialism
First Nations
Cultural Sciences
Social Sciences
description In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance (NBASGA) and the fossil fuel company Southwestern Energy Resources Canada) view nature in different ways. Statements from all three actors are analysed through a loose application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. The three actors and their corresponding views of nature are also compared with each other using Gingrich and Fox’s (2002) postmodern comparation techniques as a starting point. By mapping out these discourses I hope to understand both how the actors in the debate ground their arguments in differing nature views and comprehend why the New Brunswick debate was markedly more aggressive compared to other recent fracking debates. I conclude that the three actors’ constructions of nature are both different and similar when compared. SWN Resources and NBASGA both primarily argue from a view of nature where humanity/society and the natural sphere are completely separate. However, SWN Resources’ view of nature has a colonial angle, whereas NBASGA see nature as a human right worthy of protection. Finally, Elsipogtog view nature as both holy and intimately connected to the human through a symbiotic relationship.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Ritzén, Ruben
author_facet Ritzén, Ruben
author_sort Ritzén, Ruben
title The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
title_short The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
title_full The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
title_fullStr The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
title_full_unstemmed The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
title_sort very thing that makes you rich makes me poor – fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i new brunswick, kanada
publisher Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi
publishDate 2016
url http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353
_version_ 1772814544584835072