The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada
In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Allia...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Other/Unknown Material |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 |
id |
ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:8876353 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:8876353 2023-07-30T04:03:31+02:00 The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada Ritzén, Ruben 2016 application/pdf http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 swe swe Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 Social Anthropology Fracking Constructions of nature Post-colonialism First Nations Cultural Sciences Social Sciences M2 2016 ftulundlupsp 2023-07-11T20:07:29Z In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance (NBASGA) and the fossil fuel company Southwestern Energy Resources Canada) view nature in different ways. Statements from all three actors are analysed through a loose application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. The three actors and their corresponding views of nature are also compared with each other using Gingrich and Fox’s (2002) postmodern comparation techniques as a starting point. By mapping out these discourses I hope to understand both how the actors in the debate ground their arguments in differing nature views and comprehend why the New Brunswick debate was markedly more aggressive compared to other recent fracking debates. I conclude that the three actors’ constructions of nature are both different and similar when compared. SWN Resources and NBASGA both primarily argue from a view of nature where humanity/society and the natural sphere are completely separate. However, SWN Resources’ view of nature has a colonial angle, whereas NBASGA see nature as a human right worthy of protection. Finally, Elsipogtog view nature as both holy and intimately connected to the human through a symbiotic relationship. Other/Unknown Material First Nations Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP) Canada |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP) |
op_collection_id |
ftulundlupsp |
language |
Swedish |
topic |
Social Anthropology Fracking Constructions of nature Post-colonialism First Nations Cultural Sciences Social Sciences |
spellingShingle |
Social Anthropology Fracking Constructions of nature Post-colonialism First Nations Cultural Sciences Social Sciences Ritzén, Ruben The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
topic_facet |
Social Anthropology Fracking Constructions of nature Post-colonialism First Nations Cultural Sciences Social Sciences |
description |
In this thesis I examine how the aggressive fracking-debate in the Canadian Province New Brunswick from 2010 onwards, and how the three participating actors (the fracking-critical Native Canadian group Elsipogtog First Nation, the non-native fracking-critical group New Brunswick Anti-Shale Gas Alliance (NBASGA) and the fossil fuel company Southwestern Energy Resources Canada) view nature in different ways. Statements from all three actors are analysed through a loose application of Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. The three actors and their corresponding views of nature are also compared with each other using Gingrich and Fox’s (2002) postmodern comparation techniques as a starting point. By mapping out these discourses I hope to understand both how the actors in the debate ground their arguments in differing nature views and comprehend why the New Brunswick debate was markedly more aggressive compared to other recent fracking debates. I conclude that the three actors’ constructions of nature are both different and similar when compared. SWN Resources and NBASGA both primarily argue from a view of nature where humanity/society and the natural sphere are completely separate. However, SWN Resources’ view of nature has a colonial angle, whereas NBASGA see nature as a human right worthy of protection. Finally, Elsipogtog view nature as both holy and intimately connected to the human through a symbiotic relationship. |
format |
Other/Unknown Material |
author |
Ritzén, Ruben |
author_facet |
Ritzén, Ruben |
author_sort |
Ritzén, Ruben |
title |
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
title_short |
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
title_full |
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
title_fullStr |
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Very Thing That Makes You Rich Makes Me Poor – Fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i New Brunswick, Kanada |
title_sort |
very thing that makes you rich makes me poor – fracking, natur och ontologiska schismer i new brunswick, kanada |
publisher |
Lunds universitet/Socialantropologi |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 |
geographic |
Canada |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
genre |
First Nations |
genre_facet |
First Nations |
op_relation |
http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/8876353 |
_version_ |
1772814544584835072 |