Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement

The aim of the paper is to discuss some of the basic elements of the legal system in EC law in comparison with the EEA Agreement. The conclusions will have special reference to Icelandic law. The reason for this approach is that the EEA Agreement is closely linked with EC law. Therefore it is necess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thorvaldsson, Olafur
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1554727
id ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:1554727
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlupsp:oai:lup-student-papers.lub.lu.se:1554727 2023-07-30T04:04:29+02:00 Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement Thorvaldsson, Olafur 2003 application/pdf http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1554727 eng eng Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1554727 European Affairs Law and Political Science H1 2003 ftulundlupsp 2023-07-11T20:08:00Z The aim of the paper is to discuss some of the basic elements of the legal system in EC law in comparison with the EEA Agreement. The conclusions will have special reference to Icelandic law. The reason for this approach is that the EEA Agreement is closely linked with EC law. Therefore it is necessary to begin approaching the basic rules within the EC in order to better understand the EEA system and avoid perplexity. The doctrines of direct effect and supremacy are firmly embodied as foundations of EC law, and renders the Treaty as a constitution for the Member States, which undoubtedly makes EC law so special in the history of legal integration between nations. The development of the doctrine of direct effect will be addressed with special reference to the doctrine of supremacy. The conditions an EC rule must fulfil in order to have direct effect will be deliberated and explained by case law. The different scope of these two doctrines in regard to the Treaty provisions and the secondary legislation will also be addressed. The European Economic Area, consists of the European Community and its Member States and the participating EFTA States, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The EEA Agreement was meant to retain its nature as an agreement made under public international law. It also had, however, the purpose of the creating and maintaining a homogeneous and dynamic economic area, based on common rules and equal conditions of competition and providing for adequate means of enforcement including at the judicial level. Therefore the participating EFTA States adopted the Community acquis communautaire to a very large extent. The EEA Agreement extends the internal market beyond Community boundaries, by providing the participating states of EFTA with free access to the single European market. Even though the Agreement relates mainly to the adoption of EC rules on Free movement and Competition, the Agreement also deals with integration in various fields other than these economic ones. Therefore the Agreement is ... Other/Unknown Material Iceland Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP) Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Lund University Publications Student Papers (LUP-SP)
op_collection_id ftulundlupsp
language English
topic European Affairs
Law and Political Science
spellingShingle European Affairs
Law and Political Science
Thorvaldsson, Olafur
Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
topic_facet European Affairs
Law and Political Science
description The aim of the paper is to discuss some of the basic elements of the legal system in EC law in comparison with the EEA Agreement. The conclusions will have special reference to Icelandic law. The reason for this approach is that the EEA Agreement is closely linked with EC law. Therefore it is necessary to begin approaching the basic rules within the EC in order to better understand the EEA system and avoid perplexity. The doctrines of direct effect and supremacy are firmly embodied as foundations of EC law, and renders the Treaty as a constitution for the Member States, which undoubtedly makes EC law so special in the history of legal integration between nations. The development of the doctrine of direct effect will be addressed with special reference to the doctrine of supremacy. The conditions an EC rule must fulfil in order to have direct effect will be deliberated and explained by case law. The different scope of these two doctrines in regard to the Treaty provisions and the secondary legislation will also be addressed. The European Economic Area, consists of the European Community and its Member States and the participating EFTA States, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. The EEA Agreement was meant to retain its nature as an agreement made under public international law. It also had, however, the purpose of the creating and maintaining a homogeneous and dynamic economic area, based on common rules and equal conditions of competition and providing for adequate means of enforcement including at the judicial level. Therefore the participating EFTA States adopted the Community acquis communautaire to a very large extent. The EEA Agreement extends the internal market beyond Community boundaries, by providing the participating states of EFTA with free access to the single European market. Even though the Agreement relates mainly to the adoption of EC rules on Free movement and Competition, the Agreement also deals with integration in various fields other than these economic ones. Therefore the Agreement is ...
format Other/Unknown Material
author Thorvaldsson, Olafur
author_facet Thorvaldsson, Olafur
author_sort Thorvaldsson, Olafur
title Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
title_short Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
title_full Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
title_fullStr Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
title_full_unstemmed Direct Effect, Supremacy and State Liability - A Comparison between EC Law and the EEA Agreement
title_sort direct effect, supremacy and state liability - a comparison between ec law and the eea agreement
publisher Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen
publishDate 2003
url http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1554727
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_relation http://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/1554727
_version_ 1772815974445088768