Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region

The dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) is used to project transient impacts of changes in climate on vegetation of the Barents Region. We incorporate additional plant functional types, i.e. shrubs and defined different types of open ground vegetation, to improve the representation of arctic vegeta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climatic Change
Main Authors: Wolf, Annett, Callaghan, Terry V, Larson, Karin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Springer 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1196937
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
id ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:e926b935-c0ec-43ef-89a4-0a38d4cbaa6c
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:e926b935-c0ec-43ef-89a4-0a38d4cbaa6c 2023-05-15T13:12:03+02:00 Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region Wolf, Annett Callaghan, Terry V Larson, Karin 2008 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1196937 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4 eng eng Springer https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1196937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4 wos:000253347000004 scopus:39649124443 Climatic Change; 87(1-2), pp 51-73 (2008) ISSN: 0165-0009 Physical Geography contributiontojournal/systematicreview info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2008 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4 2023-02-01T23:32:59Z The dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) is used to project transient impacts of changes in climate on vegetation of the Barents Region. We incorporate additional plant functional types, i.e. shrubs and defined different types of open ground vegetation, to improve the representation of arctic vegetation in the global model. We use future climate projections as well as control climate data for 1981-2000 from a regional climate model (REMO) that assumes a development of atmospheric CO2-concentration according to the B2-SRES scenario [IPCC, Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution working group I to the Third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)]. The model showed a generally good fit with observed data, both qualitatively when model outputs were compared to vegetation maps and quantitatively when compared with observations of biomass, NPP and LAI. The main discrepancy between the model output and observed vegetation is the overestimation of forest abundance for the northern parts of the Kola Peninsula that cannot be explained by climatic factors alone. Over the next hundred years, the model predicted an increase in boreal needle leaved evergreen forest, as extensions northwards and upwards in mountain areas, and as an increase in biomass, NPP and LAI. The model also projected that shade-intolerant broadleaved summergreen trees will be found further north and higher up in the mountain areas. Surprisingly, shrublands will decrease in extent as they are replaced by forest at their southern margins and restricted to areas high up in the mountains and to areas in northern Russia. Open ground vegetation will largely disappear in the Scandinavian mountains. Also counter-intuitively, tundra will increase in abundance due to the occupation of previously unvegetated areas in the northern part of the Barents Region. Spring greening will occur earlier and LAI will increase. Consequently, albedo will decrease both in summer and winter time, particularly in the Scandinavian ... Article in Journal/Newspaper albedo Arctic barents region Climate change kola peninsula Tundra Lund University Publications (LUP) Arctic Kola Peninsula Remo ENVELOPE(-128.718,-128.718,54.496,54.496) Climatic Change 87 1-2 51 73
institution Open Polar
collection Lund University Publications (LUP)
op_collection_id ftulundlup
language English
topic Physical Geography
spellingShingle Physical Geography
Wolf, Annett
Callaghan, Terry V
Larson, Karin
Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
topic_facet Physical Geography
description The dynamic vegetation model (LPJ-GUESS) is used to project transient impacts of changes in climate on vegetation of the Barents Region. We incorporate additional plant functional types, i.e. shrubs and defined different types of open ground vegetation, to improve the representation of arctic vegetation in the global model. We use future climate projections as well as control climate data for 1981-2000 from a regional climate model (REMO) that assumes a development of atmospheric CO2-concentration according to the B2-SRES scenario [IPCC, Climate Change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution working group I to the Third assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)]. The model showed a generally good fit with observed data, both qualitatively when model outputs were compared to vegetation maps and quantitatively when compared with observations of biomass, NPP and LAI. The main discrepancy between the model output and observed vegetation is the overestimation of forest abundance for the northern parts of the Kola Peninsula that cannot be explained by climatic factors alone. Over the next hundred years, the model predicted an increase in boreal needle leaved evergreen forest, as extensions northwards and upwards in mountain areas, and as an increase in biomass, NPP and LAI. The model also projected that shade-intolerant broadleaved summergreen trees will be found further north and higher up in the mountain areas. Surprisingly, shrublands will decrease in extent as they are replaced by forest at their southern margins and restricted to areas high up in the mountains and to areas in northern Russia. Open ground vegetation will largely disappear in the Scandinavian mountains. Also counter-intuitively, tundra will increase in abundance due to the occupation of previously unvegetated areas in the northern part of the Barents Region. Spring greening will occur earlier and LAI will increase. Consequently, albedo will decrease both in summer and winter time, particularly in the Scandinavian ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wolf, Annett
Callaghan, Terry V
Larson, Karin
author_facet Wolf, Annett
Callaghan, Terry V
Larson, Karin
author_sort Wolf, Annett
title Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
title_short Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
title_full Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
title_fullStr Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
title_full_unstemmed Future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the Barents Region
title_sort future changes in vegetation and ecosystem function of the barents region
publisher Springer
publishDate 2008
url https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1196937
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
long_lat ENVELOPE(-128.718,-128.718,54.496,54.496)
geographic Arctic
Kola Peninsula
Remo
geographic_facet Arctic
Kola Peninsula
Remo
genre albedo
Arctic
barents region
Climate change
kola peninsula
Tundra
genre_facet albedo
Arctic
barents region
Climate change
kola peninsula
Tundra
op_source Climatic Change; 87(1-2), pp 51-73 (2008)
ISSN: 0165-0009
op_relation https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1196937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
wos:000253347000004
scopus:39649124443
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9342-4
container_title Climatic Change
container_volume 87
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 51
op_container_end_page 73
_version_ 1766250121400418304