Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the...
Published in: | Health Policy |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 |
id |
ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 2024-05-19T07:42:54+00:00 Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries Ose, Solveig Osborg Kaspersen, Silje Lill Leinonen, Taina Verstappen, Suzanne de Rijk, Angelique Spasova, Slavina Hultqvist, Sara Nørup, Iben Pálsson, Jón R. Blume, Andreas Paternoga, Mike Kalseth, Jorid 2022 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 eng eng Elsevier https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 scopus:85130348709 pmid:35577620 Health Policy; 126(7), pp 619-631 (2022) ISSN: 0168-8510 Health Care Service and Management Health Policy and Services and Health Economy comparative study European countries sick-pay sickness absenteeism sickness benefit contributiontojournal/systematicreview info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2022 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 2024-04-23T23:58:21Z The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the differences with respect to burden and responsibility sharing between the social protection system, employers and employees. The tendency highlighted is that countries with shorter employer periods of sick-pay typically have stricter follow-up responsibility for employers because, in practice, they become gatekeepers of the public sickness benefit scheme. In Germany and the UK, employers have few requirements for follow-up compared with the Nordic countries because they bear most of the costs of sickness absence themselves. The same applies in Iceland, where employers carry most of the costs and have no obligation to follow up sick-listed employees. The situation in the Netherlands is paradoxical: employers have strict obligations in the follow-up regime even though they cover all the costs of the sick-leave themselves. During the pandemic, the majority of countries have adjusted their sick-pay system and increased coverage to reduce the risk of spreading Covid-19 because employees are going to work sick or when they should self-quarantine, except for the Netherlands and Belgium, which considered that the current schemes were already sufficient to reduce that risk. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Lund University Publications (LUP) Health Policy 126 7 619 631 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Lund University Publications (LUP) |
op_collection_id |
ftulundlup |
language |
English |
topic |
Health Care Service and Management Health Policy and Services and Health Economy comparative study European countries sick-pay sickness absenteeism sickness benefit |
spellingShingle |
Health Care Service and Management Health Policy and Services and Health Economy comparative study European countries sick-pay sickness absenteeism sickness benefit Ose, Solveig Osborg Kaspersen, Silje Lill Leinonen, Taina Verstappen, Suzanne de Rijk, Angelique Spasova, Slavina Hultqvist, Sara Nørup, Iben Pálsson, Jón R. Blume, Andreas Paternoga, Mike Kalseth, Jorid Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
topic_facet |
Health Care Service and Management Health Policy and Services and Health Economy comparative study European countries sick-pay sickness absenteeism sickness benefit |
description |
The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the differences with respect to burden and responsibility sharing between the social protection system, employers and employees. The tendency highlighted is that countries with shorter employer periods of sick-pay typically have stricter follow-up responsibility for employers because, in practice, they become gatekeepers of the public sickness benefit scheme. In Germany and the UK, employers have few requirements for follow-up compared with the Nordic countries because they bear most of the costs of sickness absence themselves. The same applies in Iceland, where employers carry most of the costs and have no obligation to follow up sick-listed employees. The situation in the Netherlands is paradoxical: employers have strict obligations in the follow-up regime even though they cover all the costs of the sick-leave themselves. During the pandemic, the majority of countries have adjusted their sick-pay system and increased coverage to reduce the risk of spreading Covid-19 because employees are going to work sick or when they should self-quarantine, except for the Netherlands and Belgium, which considered that the current schemes were already sufficient to reduce that risk. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Ose, Solveig Osborg Kaspersen, Silje Lill Leinonen, Taina Verstappen, Suzanne de Rijk, Angelique Spasova, Slavina Hultqvist, Sara Nørup, Iben Pálsson, Jón R. Blume, Andreas Paternoga, Mike Kalseth, Jorid |
author_facet |
Ose, Solveig Osborg Kaspersen, Silje Lill Leinonen, Taina Verstappen, Suzanne de Rijk, Angelique Spasova, Slavina Hultqvist, Sara Nørup, Iben Pálsson, Jón R. Blume, Andreas Paternoga, Mike Kalseth, Jorid |
author_sort |
Ose, Solveig Osborg |
title |
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
title_short |
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
title_full |
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
title_fullStr |
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries |
title_sort |
follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : a comparison of nine north-western european countries |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_source |
Health Policy; 126(7), pp 619-631 (2022) ISSN: 0168-8510 |
op_relation |
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 scopus:85130348709 pmid:35577620 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 |
container_title |
Health Policy |
container_volume |
126 |
container_issue |
7 |
container_start_page |
619 |
op_container_end_page |
631 |
_version_ |
1799482603149983744 |