Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries

The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health Policy
Main Authors: Ose, Solveig Osborg, Kaspersen, Silje Lill, Leinonen, Taina, Verstappen, Suzanne, de Rijk, Angelique, Spasova, Slavina, Hultqvist, Sara, Nørup, Iben, Pálsson, Jón R., Blume, Andreas, Paternoga, Mike, Kalseth, Jorid
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002
_version_ 1832474262313631744
author Ose, Solveig Osborg
Kaspersen, Silje Lill
Leinonen, Taina
Verstappen, Suzanne
de Rijk, Angelique
Spasova, Slavina
Hultqvist, Sara
Nørup, Iben
Pálsson, Jón R.
Blume, Andreas
Paternoga, Mike
Kalseth, Jorid
author_facet Ose, Solveig Osborg
Kaspersen, Silje Lill
Leinonen, Taina
Verstappen, Suzanne
de Rijk, Angelique
Spasova, Slavina
Hultqvist, Sara
Nørup, Iben
Pálsson, Jón R.
Blume, Andreas
Paternoga, Mike
Kalseth, Jorid
author_sort Ose, Solveig Osborg
collection Lund University Publications (LUP)
container_issue 7
container_start_page 619
container_title Health Policy
container_volume 126
description The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the differences with respect to burden and responsibility sharing between the social protection system, employers and employees. The tendency highlighted is that countries with shorter employer periods of sick-pay typically have stricter follow-up responsibility for employers because, in practice, they become gatekeepers of the public sickness benefit scheme. In Germany and the UK, employers have few requirements for follow-up compared with the Nordic countries because they bear most of the costs of sickness absence themselves. The same applies in Iceland, where employers carry most of the costs and have no obligation to follow up sick-listed employees. The situation in the Netherlands is paradoxical: employers have strict obligations in the follow-up regime even though they cover all the costs of the sick-leave themselves. During the pandemic, the majority of countries have adjusted their sick-pay system and increased coverage to reduce the risk of spreading Covid-19 because employees are going to work sick or when they should self-quarantine, except for the Netherlands and Belgium, which considered that the current schemes were already sufficient to reduce that risk.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
id ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftulundlup
op_container_end_page 631
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002
op_relation http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002
pmid:35577620
scopus:85130348709
op_source Health Policy; 126(7), pp 619-631 (2022)
ISSN: 0168-8510
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 2025-05-18T14:03:38+00:00 Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries Ose, Solveig Osborg Kaspersen, Silje Lill Leinonen, Taina Verstappen, Suzanne de Rijk, Angelique Spasova, Slavina Hultqvist, Sara Nørup, Iben Pálsson, Jón R. Blume, Andreas Paternoga, Mike Kalseth, Jorid 2022 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 eng eng Elsevier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 pmid:35577620 scopus:85130348709 Health Policy; 126(7), pp 619-631 (2022) ISSN: 0168-8510 Health Care Service and Management Health Policy and Services and Health Economy comparative study European countries sick-pay sickness absenteeism sickness benefit contributiontojournal/systematicreview info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2022 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002 2025-04-23T14:48:13Z The Covid-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of social protection systems, including income security, when health problems arise. The aims of this study are to compare the follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees across nine European countries, and to conduct a qualitative assessment of the differences with respect to burden and responsibility sharing between the social protection system, employers and employees. The tendency highlighted is that countries with shorter employer periods of sick-pay typically have stricter follow-up responsibility for employers because, in practice, they become gatekeepers of the public sickness benefit scheme. In Germany and the UK, employers have few requirements for follow-up compared with the Nordic countries because they bear most of the costs of sickness absence themselves. The same applies in Iceland, where employers carry most of the costs and have no obligation to follow up sick-listed employees. The situation in the Netherlands is paradoxical: employers have strict obligations in the follow-up regime even though they cover all the costs of the sick-leave themselves. During the pandemic, the majority of countries have adjusted their sick-pay system and increased coverage to reduce the risk of spreading Covid-19 because employees are going to work sick or when they should self-quarantine, except for the Netherlands and Belgium, which considered that the current schemes were already sufficient to reduce that risk. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Lund University Publications (LUP) Health Policy 126 7 619 631
spellingShingle Health Care Service and Management
Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
comparative study
European countries
sick-pay
sickness absenteeism
sickness benefit
Ose, Solveig Osborg
Kaspersen, Silje Lill
Leinonen, Taina
Verstappen, Suzanne
de Rijk, Angelique
Spasova, Slavina
Hultqvist, Sara
Nørup, Iben
Pálsson, Jón R.
Blume, Andreas
Paternoga, Mike
Kalseth, Jorid
Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title_full Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title_fullStr Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title_short Follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : A comparison of nine north-western European countries
title_sort follow-up regimes for sick-listed employees : a comparison of nine north-western european countries
topic Health Care Service and Management
Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
comparative study
European countries
sick-pay
sickness absenteeism
sickness benefit
topic_facet Health Care Service and Management
Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
comparative study
European countries
sick-pay
sickness absenteeism
sickness benefit
url https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b2c3589f-26d7-4920-8e2c-893aff1736c1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.05.002