How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism

The Icelandic highlands are one of the few places left in Europe where tourists can experience pristine wilderness. During the past decades the highlands have, however, witnessed a rapid expansion in natural resource exploitation. This study attempts to evaluate the pristine condition of Icelandic w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tourism Geographies
Main Authors: Olafsdottir, Rannveig, Runnström, Micael
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1984699
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043
id ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:47ec935d-beb1-45c0-9a7f-681b562dc0d1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:47ec935d-beb1-45c0-9a7f-681b562dc0d1 2023-05-15T16:46:52+02:00 How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism Olafsdottir, Rannveig Runnström, Micael 2011 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1984699 https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043 eng eng Routledge https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1984699 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043 wos:000291534100006 scopus:79958846689 Tourism Geographies; 13(2), pp 280-298 (2011) ISSN: 1461-6688 Physical Geography Wilderness assessment nature tourism proximity analysis viewshed analysis geographical information system (GIS) Iceland contributiontojournal/article info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2011 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043 2023-02-01T23:32:43Z The Icelandic highlands are one of the few places left in Europe where tourists can experience pristine wilderness. During the past decades the highlands have, however, witnessed a rapid expansion in natural resource exploitation. This study attempts to evaluate the pristine condition of Icelandic wilderness by testing different methods of identifying and analysing wilderness with respect to nature-based tourism. The wilderness areas were mapped with respect to proximity to anthropogenic structures (proximity analysis) as well as what is actually visible in the landscape in relation to topography (viewshed analysis). When analysed with respect to proximity, result maps indicate that wilderness covers a little less than 34 percent of Iceland. When assessed at a national scale, results from the viewshed analysis show similar results. However, evaluation of the two methods tested indicates that the viewshed analysis gives a more dynamic image of the Icelandic wilderness areas, whereas the proximity analysis simply highlights static buffer zones relative to the network of anthropogenic features. It is concluded that a viewshed analysis provides a more qualitative result regarding the Icelandic wilderness resource at a local scale with respect to nature-based tourism. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Lund University Publications (LUP) Tourism Geographies 13 2 280 298
institution Open Polar
collection Lund University Publications (LUP)
op_collection_id ftulundlup
language English
topic Physical Geography
Wilderness assessment
nature tourism
proximity analysis
viewshed
analysis
geographical information system (GIS)
Iceland
spellingShingle Physical Geography
Wilderness assessment
nature tourism
proximity analysis
viewshed
analysis
geographical information system (GIS)
Iceland
Olafsdottir, Rannveig
Runnström, Micael
How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
topic_facet Physical Geography
Wilderness assessment
nature tourism
proximity analysis
viewshed
analysis
geographical information system (GIS)
Iceland
description The Icelandic highlands are one of the few places left in Europe where tourists can experience pristine wilderness. During the past decades the highlands have, however, witnessed a rapid expansion in natural resource exploitation. This study attempts to evaluate the pristine condition of Icelandic wilderness by testing different methods of identifying and analysing wilderness with respect to nature-based tourism. The wilderness areas were mapped with respect to proximity to anthropogenic structures (proximity analysis) as well as what is actually visible in the landscape in relation to topography (viewshed analysis). When analysed with respect to proximity, result maps indicate that wilderness covers a little less than 34 percent of Iceland. When assessed at a national scale, results from the viewshed analysis show similar results. However, evaluation of the two methods tested indicates that the viewshed analysis gives a more dynamic image of the Icelandic wilderness areas, whereas the proximity analysis simply highlights static buffer zones relative to the network of anthropogenic features. It is concluded that a viewshed analysis provides a more qualitative result regarding the Icelandic wilderness resource at a local scale with respect to nature-based tourism.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Olafsdottir, Rannveig
Runnström, Micael
author_facet Olafsdottir, Rannveig
Runnström, Micael
author_sort Olafsdottir, Rannveig
title How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
title_short How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
title_full How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
title_fullStr How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
title_full_unstemmed How Wild is Iceland? Wilderness Quality with Respect to Nature-based Tourism
title_sort how wild is iceland? wilderness quality with respect to nature-based tourism
publisher Routledge
publishDate 2011
url https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1984699
https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Tourism Geographies; 13(2), pp 280-298 (2011)
ISSN: 1461-6688
op_relation https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/1984699
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043
wos:000291534100006
scopus:79958846689
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2010.531043
container_title Tourism Geographies
container_volume 13
container_issue 2
container_start_page 280
op_container_end_page 298
_version_ 1766036956782788608