Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this...
Published in: | International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 |
id |
ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 2023-05-15T14:59:21+02:00 Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies Hamza, Mo Eriksson, Kerstin Staupe-Delgado, Reidar 2021-09-01 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 eng eng Elsevier https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 scopus:85109448505 International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction; 63, no 102433 (2021) ISSN: 2212-4209 Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Other Civil Engineering Arctic Disaster risk reduction Islands Mountain environments Remoteness Resilience Vulnerability contributiontojournal/article info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2021 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 2023-02-01T23:37:50Z The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this article we draw on three cases to analyse the issue. An Arctic case study provides insight on remoteness in terms of latitude, followed by an Andean case study reflecting on the role of altitude, and lastly an Island community case study provides a perspective on external isolation (recognising that island communities are also typically connected). From these cases we glean a number of preliminary insights for further investigation. One is that remote communities tend to avoid dependence on external actors when possible. Second, power dynamics between remote communities and centralised actors can make disaster management difficult if local capacities are overrun but trust is not present. Third, remoteness mainly becomes a direct source of vulnerability if remoteness translates into neglect, rendering places ‘peripheral’. Generalisable insights suggest that relationships take time to build and cannot be easily established after the fact. The cases hence suggest that remote areas typically have a strained relationship with centralised authorities which fosters local coping strategies but also a fear of external dependence, which may ultimately prove problematic in times of adversity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Lund University Publications (LUP) Arctic International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 63 102433 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Lund University Publications (LUP) |
op_collection_id |
ftulundlup |
language |
English |
topic |
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Other Civil Engineering Arctic Disaster risk reduction Islands Mountain environments Remoteness Resilience Vulnerability |
spellingShingle |
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Other Civil Engineering Arctic Disaster risk reduction Islands Mountain environments Remoteness Resilience Vulnerability Hamza, Mo Eriksson, Kerstin Staupe-Delgado, Reidar Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
topic_facet |
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Other Civil Engineering Arctic Disaster risk reduction Islands Mountain environments Remoteness Resilience Vulnerability |
description |
The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this article we draw on three cases to analyse the issue. An Arctic case study provides insight on remoteness in terms of latitude, followed by an Andean case study reflecting on the role of altitude, and lastly an Island community case study provides a perspective on external isolation (recognising that island communities are also typically connected). From these cases we glean a number of preliminary insights for further investigation. One is that remote communities tend to avoid dependence on external actors when possible. Second, power dynamics between remote communities and centralised actors can make disaster management difficult if local capacities are overrun but trust is not present. Third, remoteness mainly becomes a direct source of vulnerability if remoteness translates into neglect, rendering places ‘peripheral’. Generalisable insights suggest that relationships take time to build and cannot be easily established after the fact. The cases hence suggest that remote areas typically have a strained relationship with centralised authorities which fosters local coping strategies but also a fear of external dependence, which may ultimately prove problematic in times of adversity. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Hamza, Mo Eriksson, Kerstin Staupe-Delgado, Reidar |
author_facet |
Hamza, Mo Eriksson, Kerstin Staupe-Delgado, Reidar |
author_sort |
Hamza, Mo |
title |
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
title_short |
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
title_full |
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
title_fullStr |
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies |
title_sort |
locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : reflections based on three case studies |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction; 63, no 102433 (2021) ISSN: 2212-4209 |
op_relation |
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 scopus:85109448505 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 |
container_title |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction |
container_volume |
63 |
container_start_page |
102433 |
_version_ |
1766331465859072000 |