Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies

The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Main Authors: Hamza, Mo, Eriksson, Kerstin, Staupe-Delgado, Reidar
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433
id ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulundlup:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 2023-05-15T14:59:21+02:00 Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies Hamza, Mo Eriksson, Kerstin Staupe-Delgado, Reidar 2021-09-01 https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 eng eng Elsevier https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 scopus:85109448505 International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction; 63, no 102433 (2021) ISSN: 2212-4209 Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Other Civil Engineering Arctic Disaster risk reduction Islands Mountain environments Remoteness Resilience Vulnerability contributiontojournal/article info:eu-repo/semantics/article text 2021 ftulundlup https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433 2023-02-01T23:37:50Z The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this article we draw on three cases to analyse the issue. An Arctic case study provides insight on remoteness in terms of latitude, followed by an Andean case study reflecting on the role of altitude, and lastly an Island community case study provides a perspective on external isolation (recognising that island communities are also typically connected). From these cases we glean a number of preliminary insights for further investigation. One is that remote communities tend to avoid dependence on external actors when possible. Second, power dynamics between remote communities and centralised actors can make disaster management difficult if local capacities are overrun but trust is not present. Third, remoteness mainly becomes a direct source of vulnerability if remoteness translates into neglect, rendering places ‘peripheral’. Generalisable insights suggest that relationships take time to build and cannot be easily established after the fact. The cases hence suggest that remote areas typically have a strained relationship with centralised authorities which fosters local coping strategies but also a fear of external dependence, which may ultimately prove problematic in times of adversity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Lund University Publications (LUP) Arctic International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 63 102433
institution Open Polar
collection Lund University Publications (LUP)
op_collection_id ftulundlup
language English
topic Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Other Civil Engineering
Arctic
Disaster risk reduction
Islands
Mountain environments
Remoteness
Resilience
Vulnerability
spellingShingle Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Other Civil Engineering
Arctic
Disaster risk reduction
Islands
Mountain environments
Remoteness
Resilience
Vulnerability
Hamza, Mo
Eriksson, Kerstin
Staupe-Delgado, Reidar
Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
topic_facet Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Other Civil Engineering
Arctic
Disaster risk reduction
Islands
Mountain environments
Remoteness
Resilience
Vulnerability
description The relationship between geographical and social forms of remoteness and the concepts of vulnerability and capacity remains unclear. Recognising that capacities and vulnerabilities tend to co-exist in a population, the article assumes that the dynamics between these concepts are situational. In this article we draw on three cases to analyse the issue. An Arctic case study provides insight on remoteness in terms of latitude, followed by an Andean case study reflecting on the role of altitude, and lastly an Island community case study provides a perspective on external isolation (recognising that island communities are also typically connected). From these cases we glean a number of preliminary insights for further investigation. One is that remote communities tend to avoid dependence on external actors when possible. Second, power dynamics between remote communities and centralised actors can make disaster management difficult if local capacities are overrun but trust is not present. Third, remoteness mainly becomes a direct source of vulnerability if remoteness translates into neglect, rendering places ‘peripheral’. Generalisable insights suggest that relationships take time to build and cannot be easily established after the fact. The cases hence suggest that remote areas typically have a strained relationship with centralised authorities which fosters local coping strategies but also a fear of external dependence, which may ultimately prove problematic in times of adversity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Hamza, Mo
Eriksson, Kerstin
Staupe-Delgado, Reidar
author_facet Hamza, Mo
Eriksson, Kerstin
Staupe-Delgado, Reidar
author_sort Hamza, Mo
title Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
title_short Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
title_full Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
title_fullStr Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
title_full_unstemmed Locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : Reflections based on three case studies
title_sort locating potential sources of capacity and vulnerability in geographically remote areas : reflections based on three case studies
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction; 63, no 102433 (2021)
ISSN: 2212-4209
op_relation https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/192fd3d5-5424-414c-a851-ae8d99467f61
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433
scopus:85109448505
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102433
container_title International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
container_volume 63
container_start_page 102433
_version_ 1766331465859072000