Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more

What would successful deer management look like in Scotland? To some, flourishing populations of native wild deer represent success. But to others, negative impacts such as damage to woodlands and peatlands, agricultural and forestry losses, deer-vehicle collisions, and facilitating Lyme disease spr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Conservation Science
Main Authors: Kirkland, H, Hare, D, Daniels, M, Krofel, M, Rao, S, Chapman, T, Blossey, B
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85
id ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85 2023-05-15T18:50:27+02:00 Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more Kirkland, H Hare, D Daniels, M Krofel, M Rao, S Chapman, T Blossey, B 2021-11-08 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85 eng eng Frontiers Media doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC Attribution (CC BY) CC-BY Journal article 2021 ftuloxford https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303 2022-06-28T20:24:45Z What would successful deer management look like in Scotland? To some, flourishing populations of native wild deer represent success. But to others, negative impacts such as damage to woodlands and peatlands, agricultural and forestry losses, deer-vehicle collisions, and facilitating Lyme disease spread represent failure. Conflicting interests and incentives among people involved in deer management mean a common definition of success, and therefore clear management targets, remain elusive. While some environmental groups urgently call for an increase in the number of deer culled (shot) each year, other stakeholders aim to maximise deer numbers. Overcoming this governance failure will require clearly articulated, scientifically valid, and socially acceptable socio-ecological objectives to be co-produced by a broad range of stakeholders. Systematic monitoring of deer impacts will also be needed to evaluate the ability of specific management interventions to achieve defined objectives. Reintroducing Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) has been suggested as a means to reduce deer numbers and their negative ecological and socioeconomic impacts. However, evidence of lynx impacts on deer numbers, deer impacts, and social conflicts over deer suggest lynx reintroduction alone would not effectively reduce negative impacts of deer in Scotland, though it could be part of a broader solution. In the short-term, achieving sustainable numbers of deer in Scotland will require a substantial increase in the number of deer culled and effective changes to the way deer management is incentivised, regulated, implemented, and monitored. Article in Journal/Newspaper Lynx Lynx lynx lynx ORA - Oxford University Research Archive Frontiers in Conservation Science 2
institution Open Polar
collection ORA - Oxford University Research Archive
op_collection_id ftuloxford
language English
description What would successful deer management look like in Scotland? To some, flourishing populations of native wild deer represent success. But to others, negative impacts such as damage to woodlands and peatlands, agricultural and forestry losses, deer-vehicle collisions, and facilitating Lyme disease spread represent failure. Conflicting interests and incentives among people involved in deer management mean a common definition of success, and therefore clear management targets, remain elusive. While some environmental groups urgently call for an increase in the number of deer culled (shot) each year, other stakeholders aim to maximise deer numbers. Overcoming this governance failure will require clearly articulated, scientifically valid, and socially acceptable socio-ecological objectives to be co-produced by a broad range of stakeholders. Systematic monitoring of deer impacts will also be needed to evaluate the ability of specific management interventions to achieve defined objectives. Reintroducing Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) has been suggested as a means to reduce deer numbers and their negative ecological and socioeconomic impacts. However, evidence of lynx impacts on deer numbers, deer impacts, and social conflicts over deer suggest lynx reintroduction alone would not effectively reduce negative impacts of deer in Scotland, though it could be part of a broader solution. In the short-term, achieving sustainable numbers of deer in Scotland will require a substantial increase in the number of deer culled and effective changes to the way deer management is incentivised, regulated, implemented, and monitored.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kirkland, H
Hare, D
Daniels, M
Krofel, M
Rao, S
Chapman, T
Blossey, B
spellingShingle Kirkland, H
Hare, D
Daniels, M
Krofel, M
Rao, S
Chapman, T
Blossey, B
Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
author_facet Kirkland, H
Hare, D
Daniels, M
Krofel, M
Rao, S
Chapman, T
Blossey, B
author_sort Kirkland, H
title Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
title_short Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
title_full Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
title_fullStr Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
title_full_unstemmed Successful deer management in Scotland requires less conflict not more
title_sort successful deer management in scotland requires less conflict not more
publisher Frontiers Media
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85
genre Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
genre_facet Lynx
Lynx lynx lynx
op_relation doi:10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d2ed244c-d900-4576-b817-d887195a8d85
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
CC Attribution (CC BY)
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2021.770303
container_title Frontiers in Conservation Science
container_volume 2
_version_ 1766244181125103616