Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models

Major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), vortex formation and final breakdown dates are key highlight points of the stratospheric polar vortex. These phenomena are relevant for stratosphere‐troposphere coupling, which explains the interest in understanding their future changes. However, up to now...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Main Authors: Ayarzagüena, B, Charlton-Perez, AJ, Butler, AH, Hitchcock, P, Simpson, IR, Polvani, LM, Butchart, N, Gerber, EP, Gray, L, Hassler, B, Lin, P, Lott, F, Manzini, E, Mizuta, R, Orbe, C, Osprey, S, Saint-Martin, D, Sigmond, M, Taguchi, M, Volodin, EM, Watanabe, S
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c
_version_ 1821651526724091904
author Ayarzagüena, B
Charlton-Perez, AJ
Butler, AH
Hitchcock, P
Simpson, IR
Polvani, LM
Butchart, N
Gerber, EP
Gray, L
Hassler, B
Lin, P
Lott, F
Manzini, E
Mizuta, R
Orbe, C
Osprey, S
Saint-Martin, D
Sigmond, M
Taguchi, M
Volodin, EM
Watanabe, S
author_facet Ayarzagüena, B
Charlton-Perez, AJ
Butler, AH
Hitchcock, P
Simpson, IR
Polvani, LM
Butchart, N
Gerber, EP
Gray, L
Hassler, B
Lin, P
Lott, F
Manzini, E
Mizuta, R
Orbe, C
Osprey, S
Saint-Martin, D
Sigmond, M
Taguchi, M
Volodin, EM
Watanabe, S
author_sort Ayarzagüena, B
collection ORA - Oxford University Research Archive
container_issue 6
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 125
description Major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), vortex formation and final breakdown dates are key highlight points of the stratospheric polar vortex. These phenomena are relevant for stratosphere‐troposphere coupling, which explains the interest in understanding their future changes. However, up to now, there is not a clear consensus on which projected changes to the polar vortex are robust, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, possibly due to short data record or relatively moderate CO2 forcing. The new simulations performed under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6, together with the long daily data requirements of the DynVarMIP project in preindustrial and quadrupled CO2 (4xCO2) forcing simulations provide a new opportunity to revisit this topic by overcoming the limitations mentioned above. In this study, we analyze this new model output to document the change, if any, in the frequency of SSWs under 4xCO2 forcing. Our analysis reveals a large disagreement across the models as to the sign of this change, even though most models show a statistically significant change. As for the near‐surface response to SSWs, the models, however, are in good agreement as to this signal over the North Atlantic: there is no indication of a change under 4xCO2 forcing. Over the Pacific, however, the change is more uncertain, with some indication that there will be a larger mean response. Finally, the models show robust changes to the seasonal cycle in the stratosphere. Specifically, we find a longer duration of the stratospheric polar vortex, and thus a longer season of stratosphere‐troposphere coupling.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
id ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftuloxford
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345
op_relation doi:10.1029/2019jd032345
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
publishDate 2020
publisher American Geophysical Union
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c 2025-01-16T23:42:50+00:00 Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models Ayarzagüena, B Charlton-Perez, AJ Butler, AH Hitchcock, P Simpson, IR Polvani, LM Butchart, N Gerber, EP Gray, L Hassler, B Lin, P Lott, F Manzini, E Mizuta, R Orbe, C Osprey, S Saint-Martin, D Sigmond, M Taguchi, M Volodin, EM Watanabe, S 2020-03-02 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c eng eng American Geophysical Union doi:10.1029/2019jd032345 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Journal article 2020 ftuloxford https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345 2022-06-28T20:18:43Z Major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), vortex formation and final breakdown dates are key highlight points of the stratospheric polar vortex. These phenomena are relevant for stratosphere‐troposphere coupling, which explains the interest in understanding their future changes. However, up to now, there is not a clear consensus on which projected changes to the polar vortex are robust, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, possibly due to short data record or relatively moderate CO2 forcing. The new simulations performed under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6, together with the long daily data requirements of the DynVarMIP project in preindustrial and quadrupled CO2 (4xCO2) forcing simulations provide a new opportunity to revisit this topic by overcoming the limitations mentioned above. In this study, we analyze this new model output to document the change, if any, in the frequency of SSWs under 4xCO2 forcing. Our analysis reveals a large disagreement across the models as to the sign of this change, even though most models show a statistically significant change. As for the near‐surface response to SSWs, the models, however, are in good agreement as to this signal over the North Atlantic: there is no indication of a change under 4xCO2 forcing. Over the Pacific, however, the change is more uncertain, with some indication that there will be a larger mean response. Finally, the models show robust changes to the seasonal cycle in the stratosphere. Specifically, we find a longer duration of the stratospheric polar vortex, and thus a longer season of stratosphere‐troposphere coupling. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic ORA - Oxford University Research Archive Pacific Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 125 6
spellingShingle Ayarzagüena, B
Charlton-Perez, AJ
Butler, AH
Hitchcock, P
Simpson, IR
Polvani, LM
Butchart, N
Gerber, EP
Gray, L
Hassler, B
Lin, P
Lott, F
Manzini, E
Mizuta, R
Orbe, C
Osprey, S
Saint-Martin, D
Sigmond, M
Taguchi, M
Volodin, EM
Watanabe, S
Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title_full Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title_fullStr Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title_short Uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled CO2 concentrations in CMIP6 models
title_sort uncertainty in the response of sudden stratospheric warmings and stratosphere‐troposphere coupling to quadrupled co2 concentrations in cmip6 models
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032345
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9558918f-f7cf-40cb-8dc2-809e95b1917c