“The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction

Following the 1992 Mabo Decision which overturned the historical myth of terra nullius and its declaration that Australia was “nobody’s land,” Indigenous Australian literature has been concerned with recovering both the sidelined historical of colonial dispossession and traditional ecological knowle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Main Author: Brown, JM
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Taylor and Francis 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1
id ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuloxford:oai:ora.ox.ac.uk:uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1 2023-05-15T16:16:40+02:00 “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction Brown, JM 2022-04-01 https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1 eng eng Taylor and Francis doi:10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044 https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1 https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044 info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess Journal article 2022 ftuloxford https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044 2022-06-28T20:29:14Z Following the 1992 Mabo Decision which overturned the historical myth of terra nullius and its declaration that Australia was “nobody’s land,” Indigenous Australian literature has been concerned with recovering both the sidelined historical of colonial dispossession and traditional ecological knowledge. Inspired by their own storytelling traditions, First Nations writers Kim Scott and Alexis Wright reveal these Indigenous histories and cultures through their explorations of “Country”: an Aboriginal English word encompassing the belief that all things, human and non-human, are equally and spiritually connected across time in an ecological web of stories. By examining the interrelationship of postcolonialism and ecocriticism, I argue that Scott and Wright, through their respective novels That Deadman Dance and Carpentaria, promote diverse, Indigenous understandings of the environment, challenging the dominance of Anglo-American writing in ecocriticism. Alongside its capacity to interrogate the way we read and analyze nature and history, I also argue that Indigenous writing has the capacity to challenge the novel form itself by moving away from Western conceptions of linear temporality, casual development, and action or character driven plot, and instead incorporating traditional storytelling modes (oral stories, music, and dance) that are all framed by the rhythmed events of ecological time and place. Article in Journal/Newspaper First Nations ORA - Oxford University Research Archive Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 1 14
institution Open Polar
collection ORA - Oxford University Research Archive
op_collection_id ftuloxford
language English
description Following the 1992 Mabo Decision which overturned the historical myth of terra nullius and its declaration that Australia was “nobody’s land,” Indigenous Australian literature has been concerned with recovering both the sidelined historical of colonial dispossession and traditional ecological knowledge. Inspired by their own storytelling traditions, First Nations writers Kim Scott and Alexis Wright reveal these Indigenous histories and cultures through their explorations of “Country”: an Aboriginal English word encompassing the belief that all things, human and non-human, are equally and spiritually connected across time in an ecological web of stories. By examining the interrelationship of postcolonialism and ecocriticism, I argue that Scott and Wright, through their respective novels That Deadman Dance and Carpentaria, promote diverse, Indigenous understandings of the environment, challenging the dominance of Anglo-American writing in ecocriticism. Alongside its capacity to interrogate the way we read and analyze nature and history, I also argue that Indigenous writing has the capacity to challenge the novel form itself by moving away from Western conceptions of linear temporality, casual development, and action or character driven plot, and instead incorporating traditional storytelling modes (oral stories, music, and dance) that are all framed by the rhythmed events of ecological time and place.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brown, JM
spellingShingle Brown, JM
“The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
author_facet Brown, JM
author_sort Brown, JM
title “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
title_short “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
title_full “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
title_fullStr “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
title_full_unstemmed “The interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: Recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial Australian fiction
title_sort “the interconnectedness and spiritual equality of all things”: recovering indigenous ecological imagination in postcolonial australian fiction
publisher Taylor and Francis
publishDate 2022
url https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_relation doi:10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044
https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fcd9fc8-2a53-420d-9291-3a914f2df6e1
https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2022.2053044
container_title Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 14
_version_ 1766002521256493056