Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex

Four of the Arctic Ocean coastal states (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, and Russia) have articulated claims to extended seabed jurisdiction in the Arctic Ocean. The fifth coastal state, the United States, is collecting data to document a similar claim. This will “leave behind” an area of some 15...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine Policy
Main Author: Kullerud, Lars
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
id ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae 2024-02-04T09:56:24+01:00 Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex Kullerud, Lars 2020-12 https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270 http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK eng eng https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Kullerud , L 2020 , ' Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex ' , Marine Policy , vol. 122 , 104270 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270 Arctic Arctic governance Arctic ocean Arctic ocean governance Extended continental shelf Gakkel ridge International Seabed Authority (ISA) Law of the seas The Area /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/17/2 name=International political science article 2020 ftulaplandcdispu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270 2024-01-11T00:03:32Z Four of the Arctic Ocean coastal states (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, and Russia) have articulated claims to extended seabed jurisdiction in the Arctic Ocean. The fifth coastal state, the United States, is collecting data to document a similar claim. This will “leave behind” an area of some 157,000 km 2 , encompassing a large part of the Gakkel Ridge and the surrounding deep ocean seabed not claimed by any state. This area will become part of “the Area” as defined in Part XI of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and be subject to the policies of the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The Arctic Ocean coastal states acknowledge the legal framework of the law of the sea, but they have asserted that they are in a “unique position” to address “possibilities and challenges” relating to Arctic Ocean developments in the Ilulissat Declaration (2008) [1]. They can be expected to oppose initiatives on the part of non-Arctic states to sponsor requests for permission to explore for or exploit minerals in the area of the Gakkel Ridge without their consent. The result is a classic tension between broad legal formulas and the political realities of specific situations. We introduce the idea of dealing with this tension by creating a specialized Gakkel Ridge Regime modeled after the 2018 Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries Agreement. Together with other binding and non-binding agreements, such a regime can become an element in the evolving Arctic Ocean governance complex. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Arctic Ocean Central Arctic Greenland Ilulissat Ilulissat Declaration Law of the Sea LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System Arctic Arctic Ocean Canada Gakkel Ridge ENVELOPE(90.000,90.000,87.000,87.000) Greenland Ilulissat ENVELOPE(-51.099,-51.099,69.220,69.220) Norway Marine Policy 122 104270
institution Open Polar
collection LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System
op_collection_id ftulaplandcdispu
language English
topic Arctic
Arctic governance
Arctic ocean
Arctic ocean governance
Extended continental shelf
Gakkel ridge
International Seabed Authority (ISA)
Law of the seas
The Area
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/17/2
name=International political science
spellingShingle Arctic
Arctic governance
Arctic ocean
Arctic ocean governance
Extended continental shelf
Gakkel ridge
International Seabed Authority (ISA)
Law of the seas
The Area
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/17/2
name=International political science
Kullerud, Lars
Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
topic_facet Arctic
Arctic governance
Arctic ocean
Arctic ocean governance
Extended continental shelf
Gakkel ridge
International Seabed Authority (ISA)
Law of the seas
The Area
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/17/2
name=International political science
description Four of the Arctic Ocean coastal states (Canada, Denmark/Greenland, Norway, and Russia) have articulated claims to extended seabed jurisdiction in the Arctic Ocean. The fifth coastal state, the United States, is collecting data to document a similar claim. This will “leave behind” an area of some 157,000 km 2 , encompassing a large part of the Gakkel Ridge and the surrounding deep ocean seabed not claimed by any state. This area will become part of “the Area” as defined in Part XI of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and be subject to the policies of the International Seabed Authority (ISA). The Arctic Ocean coastal states acknowledge the legal framework of the law of the sea, but they have asserted that they are in a “unique position” to address “possibilities and challenges” relating to Arctic Ocean developments in the Ilulissat Declaration (2008) [1]. They can be expected to oppose initiatives on the part of non-Arctic states to sponsor requests for permission to explore for or exploit minerals in the area of the Gakkel Ridge without their consent. The result is a classic tension between broad legal formulas and the political realities of specific situations. We introduce the idea of dealing with this tension by creating a specialized Gakkel Ridge Regime modeled after the 2018 Central Arctic Ocean Fisheries Agreement. Together with other binding and non-binding agreements, such a regime can become an element in the evolving Arctic Ocean governance complex.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kullerud, Lars
author_facet Kullerud, Lars
author_sort Kullerud, Lars
title Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
title_short Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
title_full Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
title_fullStr Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
title_full_unstemmed Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex
title_sort adding a gakkel ridge regime to the evolving arctic ocean governance complex
publishDate 2020
url https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85094612229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
long_lat ENVELOPE(90.000,90.000,87.000,87.000)
ENVELOPE(-51.099,-51.099,69.220,69.220)
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
Gakkel Ridge
Greenland
Ilulissat
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Canada
Gakkel Ridge
Greenland
Ilulissat
Norway
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
Greenland
Ilulissat
Ilulissat Declaration
Law of the Sea
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Central Arctic
Greenland
Ilulissat
Ilulissat Declaration
Law of the Sea
op_source Kullerud , L 2020 , ' Adding a Gakkel Ridge Regime to the Evolving Arctic Ocean Governance Complex ' , Marine Policy , vol. 122 , 104270 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270
op_relation https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/74b4c7a7-34f3-497f-bbb7-677f98e2d3ae
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104270
container_title Marine Policy
container_volume 122
container_start_page 104270
_version_ 1789960928535511040