Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions

This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Extractive Industries and Society
Main Authors: Stammler, Florian, Ivanova, Aitalina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125
_version_ 1834377311937363968
author Stammler, Florian
Ivanova, Aitalina
author_facet Stammler, Florian
Ivanova, Aitalina
author_sort Stammler, Florian
collection LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System
container_issue 1
container_start_page 60
container_title The Extractive Industries and Society
container_volume 3
description This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing for humans living as part of the land in a reciprocal relationship. We investigate the encounter of these two in the Russian industrialised North. In all cases we see people agree that the utilitarian logic prevails. The partnership logic can exist safely only in a narrowly circumscribed niche. State law governs this niche, based on the utilitarian assumption that resources have to be useful for human society. Drawing on data from Kamchatka and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, we identify three scenarios of the encounter between those two logics in people- resource relations: confrontation, coexistence and co-ignorance. We analyse under which conditions this encounter assumes which form. We conclude that a partnership approach to land and resources can only survive as a marginal island in a world dominated by an extractivist mindset, but that indigenous people can preserve a niche for their partnership approach if they internalise the utilitarian logic, acknowledge its dominance and learn to play the extractivist game.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre Arctic
Kamchatka
nenets
Nenets Autonomous Okrug
Russian North
genre_facet Arctic
Kamchatka
nenets
Nenets Autonomous Okrug
Russian North
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
id ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftulaplandcdispu
op_container_end_page 72
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_source Stammler , F & Ivanova , A 2016 , ' Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance? negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions ' , The Extractive Industries and Society , vol. 3 , no. 1 , pp. 60-72 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003
publishDate 2016
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 2025-06-08T13:59:21+00:00 Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions Stammler, Florian Ivanova, Aitalina 2016-01 https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Stammler , F & Ivanova , A 2016 , ' Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance? negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions ' , The Extractive Industries and Society , vol. 3 , no. 1 , pp. 60-72 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 Human-resource relations Industrialisation Indigenous peoples Russian North Extractivism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3 name=Social anthropology article 2016 ftulaplandcdispu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 2025-05-13T03:19:15Z This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing for humans living as part of the land in a reciprocal relationship. We investigate the encounter of these two in the Russian industrialised North. In all cases we see people agree that the utilitarian logic prevails. The partnership logic can exist safely only in a narrowly circumscribed niche. State law governs this niche, based on the utilitarian assumption that resources have to be useful for human society. Drawing on data from Kamchatka and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, we identify three scenarios of the encounter between those two logics in people- resource relations: confrontation, coexistence and co-ignorance. We analyse under which conditions this encounter assumes which form. We conclude that a partnership approach to land and resources can only survive as a marginal island in a world dominated by an extractivist mindset, but that indigenous people can preserve a niche for their partnership approach if they internalise the utilitarian logic, acknowledge its dominance and learn to play the extractivist game. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Kamchatka nenets Nenets Autonomous Okrug Russian North LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System Arctic The Extractive Industries and Society 3 1 60 72
spellingShingle Human-resource relations
Industrialisation
Indigenous peoples
Russian North
Extractivism
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3
name=Social anthropology
Stammler, Florian
Ivanova, Aitalina
Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title_full Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title_fullStr Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title_full_unstemmed Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title_short Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
title_sort confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two russian regions
topic Human-resource relations
Industrialisation
Indigenous peoples
Russian North
Extractivism
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3
name=Social anthropology
topic_facet Human-resource relations
Industrialisation
Indigenous peoples
Russian North
Extractivism
/dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3
name=Social anthropology
url https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125