Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions
This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing...
Published in: | The Extractive Industries and Society |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125 |
_version_ | 1834377311937363968 |
---|---|
author | Stammler, Florian Ivanova, Aitalina |
author_facet | Stammler, Florian Ivanova, Aitalina |
author_sort | Stammler, Florian |
collection | LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | The Extractive Industries and Society |
container_volume | 3 |
description | This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing for humans living as part of the land in a reciprocal relationship. We investigate the encounter of these two in the Russian industrialised North. In all cases we see people agree that the utilitarian logic prevails. The partnership logic can exist safely only in a narrowly circumscribed niche. State law governs this niche, based on the utilitarian assumption that resources have to be useful for human society. Drawing on data from Kamchatka and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, we identify three scenarios of the encounter between those two logics in people- resource relations: confrontation, coexistence and co-ignorance. We analyse under which conditions this encounter assumes which form. We conclude that a partnership approach to land and resources can only survive as a marginal island in a world dominated by an extractivist mindset, but that indigenous people can preserve a niche for their partnership approach if they internalise the utilitarian logic, acknowledge its dominance and learn to play the extractivist game. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic Kamchatka nenets Nenets Autonomous Okrug Russian North |
genre_facet | Arctic Kamchatka nenets Nenets Autonomous Okrug Russian North |
geographic | Arctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic |
id | ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftulaplandcdispu |
op_container_end_page | 72 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 |
op_rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_source | Stammler , F & Ivanova , A 2016 , ' Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance? negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions ' , The Extractive Industries and Society , vol. 3 , no. 1 , pp. 60-72 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 2025-06-08T13:59:21+00:00 Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions Stammler, Florian Ivanova, Aitalina 2016-01 https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Stammler , F & Ivanova , A 2016 , ' Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance? negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions ' , The Extractive Industries and Society , vol. 3 , no. 1 , pp. 60-72 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 Human-resource relations Industrialisation Indigenous peoples Russian North Extractivism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3 name=Social anthropology article 2016 ftulaplandcdispu https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 2025-05-13T03:19:15Z This contribution analyses relations between people and resources according to two principal logics which we identified during fieldwork in the Russian Arctic and sub-Arctic: the utilitarian logic standing for the idea that humans own, control and exploit the land, and the partnership logic standing for humans living as part of the land in a reciprocal relationship. We investigate the encounter of these two in the Russian industrialised North. In all cases we see people agree that the utilitarian logic prevails. The partnership logic can exist safely only in a narrowly circumscribed niche. State law governs this niche, based on the utilitarian assumption that resources have to be useful for human society. Drawing on data from Kamchatka and the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, we identify three scenarios of the encounter between those two logics in people- resource relations: confrontation, coexistence and co-ignorance. We analyse under which conditions this encounter assumes which form. We conclude that a partnership approach to land and resources can only survive as a marginal island in a world dominated by an extractivist mindset, but that indigenous people can preserve a niche for their partnership approach if they internalise the utilitarian logic, acknowledge its dominance and learn to play the extractivist game. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Kamchatka nenets Nenets Autonomous Okrug Russian North LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System Arctic The Extractive Industries and Society 3 1 60 72 |
spellingShingle | Human-resource relations Industrialisation Indigenous peoples Russian North Extractivism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3 name=Social anthropology Stammler, Florian Ivanova, Aitalina Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title | Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title_full | Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title_fullStr | Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title_full_unstemmed | Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title_short | Confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two Russian regions |
title_sort | confrontation, coexistence or co-ignorance?:negotiating human-resource relations in two russian regions |
topic | Human-resource relations Industrialisation Indigenous peoples Russian North Extractivism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3 name=Social anthropology |
topic_facet | Human-resource relations Industrialisation Indigenous peoples Russian North Extractivism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/5/14/3 name=Social anthropology |
url | https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/62b57b7a-4517-48a0-9704-dbb8f4785680 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.003 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X15300125 |