Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management
In this paper, we critically examine the co-management of Indigenous peoples’ cultural heritage as simultaneously a driver and product of the culturalisation of Indigenous peoples: the reduction of complex legal- political orders, anchored in specific lands, value systems, rights, and prac- tices, t...
Published in: | International Journal of Heritage Studies |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 https://lacris.ulapland.fi/ws/files/5940039/Indigenous_governance_of_cultural_heritage.pdf |
id |
ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftulaplandcdispu:oai:lacris.ulapland.fi:publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c 2024-06-23T07:54:27+00:00 Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management Grey, Sam Kuokkanen, Rauna 2019-12-17 application/pdf https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 https://lacris.ulapland.fi/ws/files/5940039/Indigenous_governance_of_cultural_heritage.pdf eng eng https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Grey , S & Kuokkanen , R 2019 , ' Indigenous governance of cultural heritage : searching for alternatives to co-management ' , International Journal of Heritage Studies . https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 Cultural heritage world heritage co-management Indigenous peoples self-determination settler colonialism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/6/15 name=History and archaeology article 2019 ftulaplandcdispu https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 2024-06-10T23:41:12Z In this paper, we critically examine the co-management of Indigenous peoples’ cultural heritage as simultaneously a driver and product of the culturalisation of Indigenous peoples: the reduction of complex legal- political orders, anchored in specific lands, value systems, rights, and prac- tices, to material cultures. Co-management has been hailed as a defensibly imperfect, ‘tweakable’ system that benefits both Indigenous and state parties, and moreover, a stepping stone to Indigenous self-determination. Departing from these analyses, we argue that co-management is not just an administrative arrangement but also a state-ratified international rights regime, and accordingly, that it cannot do other than undermine Indigenous self-determination and imperil Indigenous peoples’ cultural heritage. We suggest that cultural heritage can only thrive by being actively engaged with in situ: via the living practice of Indigenous governance. Operationalising our argument, we first consider the challenges of cultural heritage protection in Sápmi; specifically, the co-management of Laponia, in Sweden, and the unprotected sacred area of Suttesája in Finland. We then discuss a more promising framework: the Quechua ‘Biocultural Heritage Territory’ of the Parque de la Papa, in Peru. Finally, we apply the lessons of the Parque to Suttesája, showing how this opens up governance-based avenues to safeguarding Indigenous sacred areas. Article in Journal/Newspaper Laponia LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System International Journal of Heritage Studies 26 10 919 941 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
LaCRIS - University of Lapland Current Research System |
op_collection_id |
ftulaplandcdispu |
language |
English |
topic |
Cultural heritage world heritage co-management Indigenous peoples self-determination settler colonialism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/6/15 name=History and archaeology |
spellingShingle |
Cultural heritage world heritage co-management Indigenous peoples self-determination settler colonialism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/6/15 name=History and archaeology Grey, Sam Kuokkanen, Rauna Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
topic_facet |
Cultural heritage world heritage co-management Indigenous peoples self-determination settler colonialism /dk/atira/pure/person/fieldofscience2010/6/15 name=History and archaeology |
description |
In this paper, we critically examine the co-management of Indigenous peoples’ cultural heritage as simultaneously a driver and product of the culturalisation of Indigenous peoples: the reduction of complex legal- political orders, anchored in specific lands, value systems, rights, and prac- tices, to material cultures. Co-management has been hailed as a defensibly imperfect, ‘tweakable’ system that benefits both Indigenous and state parties, and moreover, a stepping stone to Indigenous self-determination. Departing from these analyses, we argue that co-management is not just an administrative arrangement but also a state-ratified international rights regime, and accordingly, that it cannot do other than undermine Indigenous self-determination and imperil Indigenous peoples’ cultural heritage. We suggest that cultural heritage can only thrive by being actively engaged with in situ: via the living practice of Indigenous governance. Operationalising our argument, we first consider the challenges of cultural heritage protection in Sápmi; specifically, the co-management of Laponia, in Sweden, and the unprotected sacred area of Suttesája in Finland. We then discuss a more promising framework: the Quechua ‘Biocultural Heritage Territory’ of the Parque de la Papa, in Peru. Finally, we apply the lessons of the Parque to Suttesája, showing how this opens up governance-based avenues to safeguarding Indigenous sacred areas. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Grey, Sam Kuokkanen, Rauna |
author_facet |
Grey, Sam Kuokkanen, Rauna |
author_sort |
Grey, Sam |
title |
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
title_short |
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
title_full |
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
title_fullStr |
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
title_sort |
indigenous governance of cultural heritage:searching for alternatives to co-management |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 https://lacris.ulapland.fi/ws/files/5940039/Indigenous_governance_of_cultural_heritage.pdf |
genre |
Laponia |
genre_facet |
Laponia |
op_source |
Grey , S & Kuokkanen , R 2019 , ' Indigenous governance of cultural heritage : searching for alternatives to co-management ' , International Journal of Heritage Studies . https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 |
op_relation |
https://research.ulapland.fi/fi/publications/1536ac90-b2a7-46df-82eb-cdc90949597c |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 |
container_title |
International Journal of Heritage Studies |
container_volume |
26 |
container_issue |
10 |
container_start_page |
919 |
op_container_end_page |
941 |
_version_ |
1802646604172230656 |