Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering

In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Research Letters
Main Authors: Jackson, L. S., Crook, J. A., Jarvis, Andrew James, Leedal, David Thomas, Ridgwell, A., Vaughan, Naomi, Forster, P. M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/
https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/1/Jackson_et_al_2015_Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240
id ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:82373
record_format openpolar
spelling ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:82373 2023-08-27T04:06:43+02:00 Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering Jackson, L. S. Crook, J. A. Jarvis, Andrew James Leedal, David Thomas Ridgwell, A. Vaughan, Naomi Forster, P. M. 2015-02-28 application/pdf https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/ https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/1/Jackson_et_al_2015_Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240 en eng https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/1/Jackson_et_al_2015_Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf Jackson, L. S. and Crook, J. A. and Jarvis, Andrew James and Leedal, David Thomas and Ridgwell, A. and Vaughan, Naomi and Forster, P. M. (2015) Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (4). pp. 1223-1231. ISSN 0094-8276 creative_commons_attribution_4_0_international_license Journal Article PeerReviewed 2015 ftulancaster https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240 2023-08-03T22:30:15Z In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no rerunning or reference to control simulations. SO2 injection rates were proposed using a novel model predictive control regime which incorporated a second simpler climate model to forecast “optimal” decision pathways. Commencing the simulation in 2018, Arctic sea ice cover was remediated by 2043 and maintained until solar geoengineering was terminated. We found quantifying climate side effects problematic because internal climate variability hampered detection of regional climate changes beyond the Arctic. Nevertheless, through decision maker learning and the accumulation of at least 10 years time series data exploited through an annual review cycle, uncertainties in observations and forcings were successfully managed. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Sea ice Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints Arctic Geophysical Research Letters 42 4 1223 1231
institution Open Polar
collection Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints
op_collection_id ftulancaster
language English
description In an assessment of how Arctic sea ice cover could be remediated in a warming world, we simulated the injection of SO2 into the Arctic stratosphere making annual adjustments to injection rates. We treated one climate model realization as a surrogate “real world” with imperfect “observations” and no rerunning or reference to control simulations. SO2 injection rates were proposed using a novel model predictive control regime which incorporated a second simpler climate model to forecast “optimal” decision pathways. Commencing the simulation in 2018, Arctic sea ice cover was remediated by 2043 and maintained until solar geoengineering was terminated. We found quantifying climate side effects problematic because internal climate variability hampered detection of regional climate changes beyond the Arctic. Nevertheless, through decision maker learning and the accumulation of at least 10 years time series data exploited through an annual review cycle, uncertainties in observations and forcings were successfully managed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jackson, L. S.
Crook, J. A.
Jarvis, Andrew James
Leedal, David Thomas
Ridgwell, A.
Vaughan, Naomi
Forster, P. M.
spellingShingle Jackson, L. S.
Crook, J. A.
Jarvis, Andrew James
Leedal, David Thomas
Ridgwell, A.
Vaughan, Naomi
Forster, P. M.
Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
author_facet Jackson, L. S.
Crook, J. A.
Jarvis, Andrew James
Leedal, David Thomas
Ridgwell, A.
Vaughan, Naomi
Forster, P. M.
author_sort Jackson, L. S.
title Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
title_short Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
title_full Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
title_fullStr Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
title_sort assessing the controllability of arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering
publishDate 2015
url https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/
https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/1/Jackson_et_al_2015_Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Sea ice
op_relation https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/82373/1/Jackson_et_al_2015_Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf
Jackson, L. S. and Crook, J. A. and Jarvis, Andrew James and Leedal, David Thomas and Ridgwell, A. and Vaughan, Naomi and Forster, P. M. (2015) Assessing the controllability of Arctic sea ice extent by sulfate aerosol geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (4). pp. 1223-1231. ISSN 0094-8276
op_rights creative_commons_attribution_4_0_international_license
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062240
container_title Geophysical Research Letters
container_volume 42
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1223
op_container_end_page 1231
_version_ 1775347531098619904