Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
We analyse simulations performed for the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine. We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including a range of sens...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/124248/ https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 |
id |
ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:124248 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints |
op_collection_id |
ftulancaster |
language |
unknown |
description |
We analyse simulations performed for the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine. We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including a range of sensitivity studies which examine the impact of climate change on ozone recovery. For the control simulations (unconstrained by nudging towards analysed meteorology) there is a large spread (±20 DU in the global average) in the predictions of the absolute ozone column. Therefore, the model results need to be adjusted for biases against historical data. Also, the interannual variability in the model results need to be smoothed in order to provide a reasonably narrow estimate of the range of ozone return dates. Consistent with previous studies, but here for a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) of 6.0, these new CCMI simulations project that global total column ozone will return to 1980 values in 2047 (with a 1-σ uncertainty of 2042–2052). At Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes column ozone is projected to return to 1980 values in 2046 (2042–2050), and at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in 2034 (2024–2044). In the polar regions, the return dates are 2062 (2055–2066) in the Antarctic in October and 2035 (2025–2040) in the Arctic in March. The earlier return dates in the NH reflect the larger sensitivity to dynamical changes. Our estimates of return dates are later than those presented in the 2014 Ozone Assessment by approximately 5–15 years, depending on the region. In the tropics only around half the models predict a return to 1980 values, at around 2040, while the other half do not reach this value. All models show a negative trend in tropical total column ozone towards the end of the 21st century. The CCMI models generally agree in their simulation of the time evolution of stratospheric chlorine, which is the main driver of ozone loss and recovery. However, there are a few outliers which show that the multi-model ... |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Dhomse, Sandip Kinnison, Douglas Chipperfield, Martyn Cionni, Irene Hegglin, Michaela Abraham, Luke Akiyoshi, Hideharu Archibald, Alex Bednarz, Ewa Monika Bekki, Slimane Braesicke, Peter Butchart, Neal Dameris, Martin Deushi, Makoto Frith, Stacy Hardiman, Steven Hassler, Birgit Horowitz, Larry Hu, Rong-Ming Jöckel, Patrick Josse, Beatrice Kirner, Oliver Kremser, Stefanie Langematz, Ulrike Lewis, Jared Marchand, Marion Lin, Meiyun Mancini, Eva Marécal, Virginie Michou, Martine Morgenstern, Olaf O'Connor, Fiona Oman, Luke Pitari, Giovanni Plummer, David Pyle, John Revell, Laura Rozanov, Eugene Schofield, Robyn Stenke, Andrea Stone, Kane Sudo, Kengo Tilmes, Simone Visioni, Daniele Yamashita, Yousuke Zeng, Guang |
spellingShingle |
Dhomse, Sandip Kinnison, Douglas Chipperfield, Martyn Cionni, Irene Hegglin, Michaela Abraham, Luke Akiyoshi, Hideharu Archibald, Alex Bednarz, Ewa Monika Bekki, Slimane Braesicke, Peter Butchart, Neal Dameris, Martin Deushi, Makoto Frith, Stacy Hardiman, Steven Hassler, Birgit Horowitz, Larry Hu, Rong-Ming Jöckel, Patrick Josse, Beatrice Kirner, Oliver Kremser, Stefanie Langematz, Ulrike Lewis, Jared Marchand, Marion Lin, Meiyun Mancini, Eva Marécal, Virginie Michou, Martine Morgenstern, Olaf O'Connor, Fiona Oman, Luke Pitari, Giovanni Plummer, David Pyle, John Revell, Laura Rozanov, Eugene Schofield, Robyn Stenke, Andrea Stone, Kane Sudo, Kengo Tilmes, Simone Visioni, Daniele Yamashita, Yousuke Zeng, Guang Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
author_facet |
Dhomse, Sandip Kinnison, Douglas Chipperfield, Martyn Cionni, Irene Hegglin, Michaela Abraham, Luke Akiyoshi, Hideharu Archibald, Alex Bednarz, Ewa Monika Bekki, Slimane Braesicke, Peter Butchart, Neal Dameris, Martin Deushi, Makoto Frith, Stacy Hardiman, Steven Hassler, Birgit Horowitz, Larry Hu, Rong-Ming Jöckel, Patrick Josse, Beatrice Kirner, Oliver Kremser, Stefanie Langematz, Ulrike Lewis, Jared Marchand, Marion Lin, Meiyun Mancini, Eva Marécal, Virginie Michou, Martine Morgenstern, Olaf O'Connor, Fiona Oman, Luke Pitari, Giovanni Plummer, David Pyle, John Revell, Laura Rozanov, Eugene Schofield, Robyn Stenke, Andrea Stone, Kane Sudo, Kengo Tilmes, Simone Visioni, Daniele Yamashita, Yousuke Zeng, Guang |
author_sort |
Dhomse, Sandip |
title |
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
title_short |
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
title_full |
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
title_fullStr |
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations |
title_sort |
estimates of ozone return dates from chemistry-climate model initiative simulations |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/124248/ https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 |
geographic |
Antarctic Arctic The Antarctic |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Arctic The Antarctic |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Climate change |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Climate change |
op_relation |
Dhomse, Sandip and Kinnison, Douglas and Chipperfield, Martyn and Cionni, Irene and Hegglin, Michaela and Abraham, Luke and Akiyoshi, Hideharu and Archibald, Alex and Bednarz, Ewa Monika and Bekki, Slimane and Braesicke, Peter and Butchart, Neal and Dameris, Martin and Deushi, Makoto and Frith, Stacy and Hardiman, Steven and Hassler, Birgit and Horowitz, Larry and Hu, Rong-Ming and Jöckel, Patrick and Josse, Beatrice and Kirner, Oliver and Kremser, Stefanie and Langematz, Ulrike and Lewis, Jared and Marchand, Marion and Lin, Meiyun and Mancini, Eva and Marécal, Virginie and Michou, Martine and Morgenstern, Olaf and O'Connor, Fiona and Oman, Luke and Pitari, Giovanni and Plummer, David and Pyle, John and Revell, Laura and Rozanov, Eugene and Schofield, Robyn and Stenke, Andrea and Stone, Kane and Sudo, Kengo and Tilmes, Simone and Visioni, Daniele and Yamashita, Yousuke and Zeng, Guang (2018) Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 18 (11). pp. 8409-8438. ISSN 1680-7367 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 |
_version_ |
1775357286104956928 |
spelling |
ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:124248 2023-08-27T04:05:34+02:00 Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations Dhomse, Sandip Kinnison, Douglas Chipperfield, Martyn Cionni, Irene Hegglin, Michaela Abraham, Luke Akiyoshi, Hideharu Archibald, Alex Bednarz, Ewa Monika Bekki, Slimane Braesicke, Peter Butchart, Neal Dameris, Martin Deushi, Makoto Frith, Stacy Hardiman, Steven Hassler, Birgit Horowitz, Larry Hu, Rong-Ming Jöckel, Patrick Josse, Beatrice Kirner, Oliver Kremser, Stefanie Langematz, Ulrike Lewis, Jared Marchand, Marion Lin, Meiyun Mancini, Eva Marécal, Virginie Michou, Martine Morgenstern, Olaf O'Connor, Fiona Oman, Luke Pitari, Giovanni Plummer, David Pyle, John Revell, Laura Rozanov, Eugene Schofield, Robyn Stenke, Andrea Stone, Kane Sudo, Kengo Tilmes, Simone Visioni, Daniele Yamashita, Yousuke Zeng, Guang 2018-06-15 https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/124248/ https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 unknown Dhomse, Sandip and Kinnison, Douglas and Chipperfield, Martyn and Cionni, Irene and Hegglin, Michaela and Abraham, Luke and Akiyoshi, Hideharu and Archibald, Alex and Bednarz, Ewa Monika and Bekki, Slimane and Braesicke, Peter and Butchart, Neal and Dameris, Martin and Deushi, Makoto and Frith, Stacy and Hardiman, Steven and Hassler, Birgit and Horowitz, Larry and Hu, Rong-Ming and Jöckel, Patrick and Josse, Beatrice and Kirner, Oliver and Kremser, Stefanie and Langematz, Ulrike and Lewis, Jared and Marchand, Marion and Lin, Meiyun and Mancini, Eva and Marécal, Virginie and Michou, Martine and Morgenstern, Olaf and O'Connor, Fiona and Oman, Luke and Pitari, Giovanni and Plummer, David and Pyle, John and Revell, Laura and Rozanov, Eugene and Schofield, Robyn and Stenke, Andrea and Stone, Kane and Sudo, Kengo and Tilmes, Simone and Visioni, Daniele and Yamashita, Yousuke and Zeng, Guang (2018) Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 18 (11). pp. 8409-8438. ISSN 1680-7367 Journal Article NonPeerReviewed 2018 ftulancaster https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 2023-08-03T22:32:56Z We analyse simulations performed for the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine. We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including a range of sensitivity studies which examine the impact of climate change on ozone recovery. For the control simulations (unconstrained by nudging towards analysed meteorology) there is a large spread (±20 DU in the global average) in the predictions of the absolute ozone column. Therefore, the model results need to be adjusted for biases against historical data. Also, the interannual variability in the model results need to be smoothed in order to provide a reasonably narrow estimate of the range of ozone return dates. Consistent with previous studies, but here for a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) of 6.0, these new CCMI simulations project that global total column ozone will return to 1980 values in 2047 (with a 1-σ uncertainty of 2042–2052). At Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes column ozone is projected to return to 1980 values in 2046 (2042–2050), and at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in 2034 (2024–2044). In the polar regions, the return dates are 2062 (2055–2066) in the Antarctic in October and 2035 (2025–2040) in the Arctic in March. The earlier return dates in the NH reflect the larger sensitivity to dynamical changes. Our estimates of return dates are later than those presented in the 2014 Ozone Assessment by approximately 5–15 years, depending on the region. In the tropics only around half the models predict a return to 1980 values, at around 2040, while the other half do not reach this value. All models show a negative trend in tropical total column ozone towards the end of the 21st century. The CCMI models generally agree in their simulation of the time evolution of stratospheric chlorine, which is the main driver of ozone loss and recovery. However, there are a few outliers which show that the multi-model ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Climate change Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints Antarctic Arctic The Antarctic |