id ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:124248
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints
op_collection_id ftulancaster
language unknown
description We analyse simulations performed for the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine. We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including a range of sensitivity studies which examine the impact of climate change on ozone recovery. For the control simulations (unconstrained by nudging towards analysed meteorology) there is a large spread (±20 DU in the global average) in the predictions of the absolute ozone column. Therefore, the model results need to be adjusted for biases against historical data. Also, the interannual variability in the model results need to be smoothed in order to provide a reasonably narrow estimate of the range of ozone return dates. Consistent with previous studies, but here for a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) of 6.0, these new CCMI simulations project that global total column ozone will return to 1980 values in 2047 (with a 1-σ uncertainty of 2042–2052). At Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes column ozone is projected to return to 1980 values in 2046 (2042–2050), and at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in 2034 (2024–2044). In the polar regions, the return dates are 2062 (2055–2066) in the Antarctic in October and 2035 (2025–2040) in the Arctic in March. The earlier return dates in the NH reflect the larger sensitivity to dynamical changes. Our estimates of return dates are later than those presented in the 2014 Ozone Assessment by approximately 5–15 years, depending on the region. In the tropics only around half the models predict a return to 1980 values, at around 2040, while the other half do not reach this value. All models show a negative trend in tropical total column ozone towards the end of the 21st century. The CCMI models generally agree in their simulation of the time evolution of stratospheric chlorine, which is the main driver of ozone loss and recovery. However, there are a few outliers which show that the multi-model ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dhomse, Sandip
Kinnison, Douglas
Chipperfield, Martyn
Cionni, Irene
Hegglin, Michaela
Abraham, Luke
Akiyoshi, Hideharu
Archibald, Alex
Bednarz, Ewa Monika
Bekki, Slimane
Braesicke, Peter
Butchart, Neal
Dameris, Martin
Deushi, Makoto
Frith, Stacy
Hardiman, Steven
Hassler, Birgit
Horowitz, Larry
Hu, Rong-Ming
Jöckel, Patrick
Josse, Beatrice
Kirner, Oliver
Kremser, Stefanie
Langematz, Ulrike
Lewis, Jared
Marchand, Marion
Lin, Meiyun
Mancini, Eva
Marécal, Virginie
Michou, Martine
Morgenstern, Olaf
O'Connor, Fiona
Oman, Luke
Pitari, Giovanni
Plummer, David
Pyle, John
Revell, Laura
Rozanov, Eugene
Schofield, Robyn
Stenke, Andrea
Stone, Kane
Sudo, Kengo
Tilmes, Simone
Visioni, Daniele
Yamashita, Yousuke
Zeng, Guang
spellingShingle Dhomse, Sandip
Kinnison, Douglas
Chipperfield, Martyn
Cionni, Irene
Hegglin, Michaela
Abraham, Luke
Akiyoshi, Hideharu
Archibald, Alex
Bednarz, Ewa Monika
Bekki, Slimane
Braesicke, Peter
Butchart, Neal
Dameris, Martin
Deushi, Makoto
Frith, Stacy
Hardiman, Steven
Hassler, Birgit
Horowitz, Larry
Hu, Rong-Ming
Jöckel, Patrick
Josse, Beatrice
Kirner, Oliver
Kremser, Stefanie
Langematz, Ulrike
Lewis, Jared
Marchand, Marion
Lin, Meiyun
Mancini, Eva
Marécal, Virginie
Michou, Martine
Morgenstern, Olaf
O'Connor, Fiona
Oman, Luke
Pitari, Giovanni
Plummer, David
Pyle, John
Revell, Laura
Rozanov, Eugene
Schofield, Robyn
Stenke, Andrea
Stone, Kane
Sudo, Kengo
Tilmes, Simone
Visioni, Daniele
Yamashita, Yousuke
Zeng, Guang
Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
author_facet Dhomse, Sandip
Kinnison, Douglas
Chipperfield, Martyn
Cionni, Irene
Hegglin, Michaela
Abraham, Luke
Akiyoshi, Hideharu
Archibald, Alex
Bednarz, Ewa Monika
Bekki, Slimane
Braesicke, Peter
Butchart, Neal
Dameris, Martin
Deushi, Makoto
Frith, Stacy
Hardiman, Steven
Hassler, Birgit
Horowitz, Larry
Hu, Rong-Ming
Jöckel, Patrick
Josse, Beatrice
Kirner, Oliver
Kremser, Stefanie
Langematz, Ulrike
Lewis, Jared
Marchand, Marion
Lin, Meiyun
Mancini, Eva
Marécal, Virginie
Michou, Martine
Morgenstern, Olaf
O'Connor, Fiona
Oman, Luke
Pitari, Giovanni
Plummer, David
Pyle, John
Revell, Laura
Rozanov, Eugene
Schofield, Robyn
Stenke, Andrea
Stone, Kane
Sudo, Kengo
Tilmes, Simone
Visioni, Daniele
Yamashita, Yousuke
Zeng, Guang
author_sort Dhomse, Sandip
title Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
title_short Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
title_full Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
title_fullStr Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations
title_sort estimates of ozone return dates from chemistry-climate model initiative simulations
publishDate 2018
url https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/124248/
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Climate change
op_relation Dhomse, Sandip and Kinnison, Douglas and Chipperfield, Martyn and Cionni, Irene and Hegglin, Michaela and Abraham, Luke and Akiyoshi, Hideharu and Archibald, Alex and Bednarz, Ewa Monika and Bekki, Slimane and Braesicke, Peter and Butchart, Neal and Dameris, Martin and Deushi, Makoto and Frith, Stacy and Hardiman, Steven and Hassler, Birgit and Horowitz, Larry and Hu, Rong-Ming and Jöckel, Patrick and Josse, Beatrice and Kirner, Oliver and Kremser, Stefanie and Langematz, Ulrike and Lewis, Jared and Marchand, Marion and Lin, Meiyun and Mancini, Eva and Marécal, Virginie and Michou, Martine and Morgenstern, Olaf and O'Connor, Fiona and Oman, Luke and Pitari, Giovanni and Plummer, David and Pyle, John and Revell, Laura and Rozanov, Eugene and Schofield, Robyn and Stenke, Andrea and Stone, Kane and Sudo, Kengo and Tilmes, Simone and Visioni, Daniele and Yamashita, Yousuke and Zeng, Guang (2018) Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 18 (11). pp. 8409-8438. ISSN 1680-7367
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018
_version_ 1775357286104956928
spelling ftulancaster:oai:eprints.lancs.ac.uk:124248 2023-08-27T04:05:34+02:00 Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations Dhomse, Sandip Kinnison, Douglas Chipperfield, Martyn Cionni, Irene Hegglin, Michaela Abraham, Luke Akiyoshi, Hideharu Archibald, Alex Bednarz, Ewa Monika Bekki, Slimane Braesicke, Peter Butchart, Neal Dameris, Martin Deushi, Makoto Frith, Stacy Hardiman, Steven Hassler, Birgit Horowitz, Larry Hu, Rong-Ming Jöckel, Patrick Josse, Beatrice Kirner, Oliver Kremser, Stefanie Langematz, Ulrike Lewis, Jared Marchand, Marion Lin, Meiyun Mancini, Eva Marécal, Virginie Michou, Martine Morgenstern, Olaf O'Connor, Fiona Oman, Luke Pitari, Giovanni Plummer, David Pyle, John Revell, Laura Rozanov, Eugene Schofield, Robyn Stenke, Andrea Stone, Kane Sudo, Kengo Tilmes, Simone Visioni, Daniele Yamashita, Yousuke Zeng, Guang 2018-06-15 https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/124248/ https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 unknown Dhomse, Sandip and Kinnison, Douglas and Chipperfield, Martyn and Cionni, Irene and Hegglin, Michaela and Abraham, Luke and Akiyoshi, Hideharu and Archibald, Alex and Bednarz, Ewa Monika and Bekki, Slimane and Braesicke, Peter and Butchart, Neal and Dameris, Martin and Deushi, Makoto and Frith, Stacy and Hardiman, Steven and Hassler, Birgit and Horowitz, Larry and Hu, Rong-Ming and Jöckel, Patrick and Josse, Beatrice and Kirner, Oliver and Kremser, Stefanie and Langematz, Ulrike and Lewis, Jared and Marchand, Marion and Lin, Meiyun and Mancini, Eva and Marécal, Virginie and Michou, Martine and Morgenstern, Olaf and O'Connor, Fiona and Oman, Luke and Pitari, Giovanni and Plummer, David and Pyle, John and Revell, Laura and Rozanov, Eugene and Schofield, Robyn and Stenke, Andrea and Stone, Kane and Sudo, Kengo and Tilmes, Simone and Visioni, Daniele and Yamashita, Yousuke and Zeng, Guang (2018) Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 18 (11). pp. 8409-8438. ISSN 1680-7367 Journal Article NonPeerReviewed 2018 ftulancaster https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-8409-2018 2023-08-03T22:32:56Z We analyse simulations performed for the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) to estimate the return dates of the stratospheric ozone layer from depletion caused by anthropogenic stratospheric chlorine and bromine. We consider a total of 155 simulations from 20 models, including a range of sensitivity studies which examine the impact of climate change on ozone recovery. For the control simulations (unconstrained by nudging towards analysed meteorology) there is a large spread (±20 DU in the global average) in the predictions of the absolute ozone column. Therefore, the model results need to be adjusted for biases against historical data. Also, the interannual variability in the model results need to be smoothed in order to provide a reasonably narrow estimate of the range of ozone return dates. Consistent with previous studies, but here for a Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) of 6.0, these new CCMI simulations project that global total column ozone will return to 1980 values in 2047 (with a 1-σ uncertainty of 2042–2052). At Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes column ozone is projected to return to 1980 values in 2046 (2042–2050), and at Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes in 2034 (2024–2044). In the polar regions, the return dates are 2062 (2055–2066) in the Antarctic in October and 2035 (2025–2040) in the Arctic in March. The earlier return dates in the NH reflect the larger sensitivity to dynamical changes. Our estimates of return dates are later than those presented in the 2014 Ozone Assessment by approximately 5–15 years, depending on the region. In the tropics only around half the models predict a return to 1980 values, at around 2040, while the other half do not reach this value. All models show a negative trend in tropical total column ozone towards the end of the 21st century. The CCMI models generally agree in their simulation of the time evolution of stratospheric chlorine, which is the main driver of ozone loss and recovery. However, there are a few outliers which show that the multi-model ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Climate change Lancaster University: Lancaster Eprints Antarctic Arctic The Antarctic