Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size

Plastic life‐history traits can be viewed as adaptive responses to environmental conditions, described by a reaction norm. In birds, the decline in clutch size with advancing laying date has been viewed as a reaction norm in response to the parent's own (somatic or local environmental) conditio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Main Authors: Brommer, J.E., Pietiainen, H., Kokko, H.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/9715/
id ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:9715
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:9715 2024-06-02T08:15:30+00:00 Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size Brommer, J.E. Pietiainen, H. Kokko, H. 2002 https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/9715/ unknown Brommer, J.E., Pietiainen, H. and Kokko, H. (2002) Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Proceedings_of_the_Royal_Society_of_London_Series_B=3A_Biological_Sciences.html>, 269, pp. 647-654. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1929 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1929>) Articles PeerReviewed 2002 ftuglasgow https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1929 2024-05-06T15:06:43Z Plastic life‐history traits can be viewed as adaptive responses to environmental conditions, described by a reaction norm. In birds, the decline in clutch size with advancing laying date has been viewed as a reaction norm in response to the parent's own (somatic or local environmental) condition and the seasonal decline in its offspring's reproductive value. Theory predicts that differences in the seasonal recruitment are mirrored in the seasonal decrease in clutch size. We tested this prediction in the Ural owl. The owl's main prey, voles, show a cycle of low, increase and peak phases. Recruitment probability had a humped distribution in both increase and peak phases. Average recruitment probability was two to three times higher in the increase phase and declined faster in the latter part of the season when compared with the peak phase. Clutch size decreased twice as steep in the peak (0.1 eggs day-1) as in the increase phase (0.05 eggs day-1). This result appears to refute theoretical predictions of seasonal clutch size declines. However, a re–examination of current theory shows that the predictions of modelling are less robust to details of seasonal condition accumulation in birds than originally thought. The observed pattern can be predicted, assuming specifically shaped seasonal increases in condition across individuals. Article in Journal/Newspaper Ural Owl University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269 1491 647 654
institution Open Polar
collection University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications
op_collection_id ftuglasgow
language unknown
description Plastic life‐history traits can be viewed as adaptive responses to environmental conditions, described by a reaction norm. In birds, the decline in clutch size with advancing laying date has been viewed as a reaction norm in response to the parent's own (somatic or local environmental) condition and the seasonal decline in its offspring's reproductive value. Theory predicts that differences in the seasonal recruitment are mirrored in the seasonal decrease in clutch size. We tested this prediction in the Ural owl. The owl's main prey, voles, show a cycle of low, increase and peak phases. Recruitment probability had a humped distribution in both increase and peak phases. Average recruitment probability was two to three times higher in the increase phase and declined faster in the latter part of the season when compared with the peak phase. Clutch size decreased twice as steep in the peak (0.1 eggs day-1) as in the increase phase (0.05 eggs day-1). This result appears to refute theoretical predictions of seasonal clutch size declines. However, a re–examination of current theory shows that the predictions of modelling are less robust to details of seasonal condition accumulation in birds than originally thought. The observed pattern can be predicted, assuming specifically shaped seasonal increases in condition across individuals.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brommer, J.E.
Pietiainen, H.
Kokko, H.
spellingShingle Brommer, J.E.
Pietiainen, H.
Kokko, H.
Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
author_facet Brommer, J.E.
Pietiainen, H.
Kokko, H.
author_sort Brommer, J.E.
title Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
title_short Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
title_full Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
title_fullStr Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
title_full_unstemmed Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size
title_sort cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in ural owl clutch size
publishDate 2002
url https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/9715/
genre Ural Owl
genre_facet Ural Owl
op_relation Brommer, J.E., Pietiainen, H. and Kokko, H. (2002) Cyclic variation in seasonal recruitment and the evolution of the seasonal decline in Ural owl clutch size. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Proceedings_of_the_Royal_Society_of_London_Series_B=3A_Biological_Sciences.html>, 269, pp. 647-654. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1929 <https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1929>)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1929
container_title Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
container_volume 269
container_issue 1491
container_start_page 647
op_container_end_page 654
_version_ 1800739695929327616