Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries
Background: Research comparing mortality by socioeconomic status has found that inequalities are not the smallest in the Nordic countries. This is in contrast to expectations given these countries’ policy focus on equity. An alternative way of studying inequality has been little used to compare ineq...
Published in: | Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/82578/ https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525 |
id |
ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:82578 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:82578 2023-05-15T16:51:23+02:00 Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries Popham, Frank Dibben, Chris Bambra, Clare 2013-05 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/82578/ https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525 unknown BMJ Publishing Group Popham, F. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/17234.html> , Dibben, C. and Bambra, C. (2013) Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Journal_of_Epidemiology_and_Community_Health.html>, 67(5), pp. 412-418. (doi:10.1136/jech-2012-201525 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525>) Articles PeerReviewed 2013 ftuglasgow https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525 2021-09-23T22:58:38Z Background: Research comparing mortality by socioeconomic status has found that inequalities are not the smallest in the Nordic countries. This is in contrast to expectations given these countries’ policy focus on equity. An alternative way of studying inequality has been little used to compare inequalities across welfare states and may yield a different conclusion. Methods: We used average life expectancy lost per death as a measure of total inequality in mortality derived from death rates from the Human Mortality Database for 37 countries in 2006 that we grouped by welfare state type. We constructed a theoretical ‘lowest mortality comparator country’ to study, by age, why countries were not achieving the smallest inequality and the highest life expectancy. We also studied life expectancy as there is an important correlation between it and inequality. Results: On average, Nordic countries had the highest life expectancy and smallest inequalities for men but not women. For both men and women, Nordic countries had particularly low younger age mortality contributing to smaller inequality and higher life expectancy. Although older age mortality in the Nordic countries is not the smallest. There was variation within Nordic countries with Sweden, Iceland and Norway having higher life expectancy and smaller inequalities than Denmark and Finland (for men). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that the Nordic countries do have the smallest inequalities in mortality for men and for younger age groups. However, this is not the case for women. Reducing premature mortality among older age groups would increase life expectancy and reduce inequality further in Nordic countries. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications Norway Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 67 5 412 418 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications |
op_collection_id |
ftuglasgow |
language |
unknown |
description |
Background: Research comparing mortality by socioeconomic status has found that inequalities are not the smallest in the Nordic countries. This is in contrast to expectations given these countries’ policy focus on equity. An alternative way of studying inequality has been little used to compare inequalities across welfare states and may yield a different conclusion. Methods: We used average life expectancy lost per death as a measure of total inequality in mortality derived from death rates from the Human Mortality Database for 37 countries in 2006 that we grouped by welfare state type. We constructed a theoretical ‘lowest mortality comparator country’ to study, by age, why countries were not achieving the smallest inequality and the highest life expectancy. We also studied life expectancy as there is an important correlation between it and inequality. Results: On average, Nordic countries had the highest life expectancy and smallest inequalities for men but not women. For both men and women, Nordic countries had particularly low younger age mortality contributing to smaller inequality and higher life expectancy. Although older age mortality in the Nordic countries is not the smallest. There was variation within Nordic countries with Sweden, Iceland and Norway having higher life expectancy and smaller inequalities than Denmark and Finland (for men). Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that the Nordic countries do have the smallest inequalities in mortality for men and for younger age groups. However, this is not the case for women. Reducing premature mortality among older age groups would increase life expectancy and reduce inequality further in Nordic countries. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Popham, Frank Dibben, Chris Bambra, Clare |
spellingShingle |
Popham, Frank Dibben, Chris Bambra, Clare Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
author_facet |
Popham, Frank Dibben, Chris Bambra, Clare |
author_sort |
Popham, Frank |
title |
Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
title_short |
Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
title_full |
Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
title_fullStr |
Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
title_sort |
are health inequalities really not the smallest in the nordic welfare states? a comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/82578/ https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525 |
geographic |
Norway |
geographic_facet |
Norway |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
Popham, F. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/17234.html> , Dibben, C. and Bambra, C. (2013) Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Journal_of_Epidemiology_and_Community_Health.html>, 67(5), pp. 412-418. (doi:10.1136/jech-2012-201525 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525>) |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2012-201525 |
container_title |
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health |
container_volume |
67 |
container_issue |
5 |
container_start_page |
412 |
op_container_end_page |
418 |
_version_ |
1766041495712825344 |