Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates

1. While the tendency to return to previously visited locations—termed ‘site fidelity’—is common in animals, the cause of this behaviour is not well understood. One hypothesis is that site fidelity is shaped by an animal's environment, such that animals living in landscapes with predictable res...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Animal Ecology
Main Authors: Morrison, Thomas A., Merkle, Jerod A., Hopcraft, J Grant C., Aikens, Ellen O., Beck, Jeffrey L., Boone, Randall B., Courtemanch, Alyson B., Dwinnell, Samantha P., Fairbanks, W. Sue, Griffith, Brad, Middleton, Arthur D., Monteith, Kevin L., Oates, Brendan, Riotte-Lambert, Louise, Sawyer, Hall, Smith, Kurt T., Stabach, Jared A., Taylor, Kaitlyn L., Kauffman, Matthew J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/5/226574.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/2/226574Suppl1.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/3/226574Suppl2.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/4/226574Suppl3.pdf
id ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:226574
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:226574 2023-05-15T13:13:36+02:00 Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates Morrison, Thomas A. Merkle, Jerod A. Hopcraft, J Grant C. Aikens, Ellen O. Beck, Jeffrey L. Boone, Randall B. Courtemanch, Alyson B. Dwinnell, Samantha P. Fairbanks, W. Sue Griffith, Brad Middleton, Arthur D. Monteith, Kevin L. Oates, Brendan Riotte-Lambert, Louise Sawyer, Hall Smith, Kurt T. Stabach, Jared A. Taylor, Kaitlyn L. Kauffman, Matthew J. 2021-04 text https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/ https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/5/226574.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/2/226574Suppl1.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/3/226574Suppl2.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/4/226574Suppl3.pdf en eng Wiley https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/5/226574.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/2/226574Suppl1.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/3/226574Suppl2.pdf https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/4/226574Suppl3.pdf Morrison, T. A. et al. (2021) Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates. Journal of Animal Ecology <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Journal_of_Animal_Ecology.html>, 90(4), pp. 955-966. (doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13425 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13425>) (PMID:33481254) cc_by_4 CC-BY Articles PeerReviewed 2021 ftuglasgow https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13425 2022-09-22T22:16:14Z 1. While the tendency to return to previously visited locations—termed ‘site fidelity’—is common in animals, the cause of this behaviour is not well understood. One hypothesis is that site fidelity is shaped by an animal's environment, such that animals living in landscapes with predictable resources have stronger site fidelity. Site fidelity may also be conditional on the success of animals’ recent visits to that location, and it may become stronger with age as the animal accumulates experience in their landscape. Finally, differences between species, such as the way memory shapes site attractiveness, may interact with environmental drivers to modulate the strength of site fidelity. 2. We compared inter‐year site fidelity in 669 individuals across eight ungulate species fitted with GPS collars and occupying a range of environmental conditions in North America and Africa. We used a distance‐based index of site fidelity and tested hypothesized drivers of site fidelity using linear mixed effects models, while accounting for variation in annual range size. 3. Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus and moose Alces alces exhibited relatively strong site fidelity, while wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus and barren‐ground caribou Rangifer tarandus granti had relatively weak fidelity. Site fidelity was strongest in predictable landscapes where vegetative greening occurred at regular intervals over time (i.e. high temporal contingency). Species differed in their response to spatial heterogeneity in greenness (i.e. spatial constancy). Site fidelity varied seasonally in some species, but remained constant over time in others. Elk employed a ‘win‐stay, lose‐switch’ strategy, in which successful resource tracking in the springtime resulted in strong site fidelity the following spring. Site fidelity did not vary with age in any species tested. 4. Our results provide support for the environmental hypothesis, particularly that regularity in vegetative phenology shapes the strength of site fidelity at the inter‐annual scale. Large ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces caribou Rangifer tarandus University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications Journal of Animal Ecology 90 4 955 966
institution Open Polar
collection University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications
op_collection_id ftuglasgow
language English
description 1. While the tendency to return to previously visited locations—termed ‘site fidelity’—is common in animals, the cause of this behaviour is not well understood. One hypothesis is that site fidelity is shaped by an animal's environment, such that animals living in landscapes with predictable resources have stronger site fidelity. Site fidelity may also be conditional on the success of animals’ recent visits to that location, and it may become stronger with age as the animal accumulates experience in their landscape. Finally, differences between species, such as the way memory shapes site attractiveness, may interact with environmental drivers to modulate the strength of site fidelity. 2. We compared inter‐year site fidelity in 669 individuals across eight ungulate species fitted with GPS collars and occupying a range of environmental conditions in North America and Africa. We used a distance‐based index of site fidelity and tested hypothesized drivers of site fidelity using linear mixed effects models, while accounting for variation in annual range size. 3. Mule deer Odocoileus hemionus and moose Alces alces exhibited relatively strong site fidelity, while wildebeest Connochaetes taurinus and barren‐ground caribou Rangifer tarandus granti had relatively weak fidelity. Site fidelity was strongest in predictable landscapes where vegetative greening occurred at regular intervals over time (i.e. high temporal contingency). Species differed in their response to spatial heterogeneity in greenness (i.e. spatial constancy). Site fidelity varied seasonally in some species, but remained constant over time in others. Elk employed a ‘win‐stay, lose‐switch’ strategy, in which successful resource tracking in the springtime resulted in strong site fidelity the following spring. Site fidelity did not vary with age in any species tested. 4. Our results provide support for the environmental hypothesis, particularly that regularity in vegetative phenology shapes the strength of site fidelity at the inter‐annual scale. Large ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Morrison, Thomas A.
Merkle, Jerod A.
Hopcraft, J Grant C.
Aikens, Ellen O.
Beck, Jeffrey L.
Boone, Randall B.
Courtemanch, Alyson B.
Dwinnell, Samantha P.
Fairbanks, W. Sue
Griffith, Brad
Middleton, Arthur D.
Monteith, Kevin L.
Oates, Brendan
Riotte-Lambert, Louise
Sawyer, Hall
Smith, Kurt T.
Stabach, Jared A.
Taylor, Kaitlyn L.
Kauffman, Matthew J.
spellingShingle Morrison, Thomas A.
Merkle, Jerod A.
Hopcraft, J Grant C.
Aikens, Ellen O.
Beck, Jeffrey L.
Boone, Randall B.
Courtemanch, Alyson B.
Dwinnell, Samantha P.
Fairbanks, W. Sue
Griffith, Brad
Middleton, Arthur D.
Monteith, Kevin L.
Oates, Brendan
Riotte-Lambert, Louise
Sawyer, Hall
Smith, Kurt T.
Stabach, Jared A.
Taylor, Kaitlyn L.
Kauffman, Matthew J.
Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
author_facet Morrison, Thomas A.
Merkle, Jerod A.
Hopcraft, J Grant C.
Aikens, Ellen O.
Beck, Jeffrey L.
Boone, Randall B.
Courtemanch, Alyson B.
Dwinnell, Samantha P.
Fairbanks, W. Sue
Griffith, Brad
Middleton, Arthur D.
Monteith, Kevin L.
Oates, Brendan
Riotte-Lambert, Louise
Sawyer, Hall
Smith, Kurt T.
Stabach, Jared A.
Taylor, Kaitlyn L.
Kauffman, Matthew J.
author_sort Morrison, Thomas A.
title Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
title_short Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
title_full Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
title_fullStr Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
title_sort drivers of site fidelity in ungulates
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/5/226574.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/2/226574Suppl1.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/3/226574Suppl2.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/4/226574Suppl3.pdf
genre Alces alces
caribou
Rangifer tarandus
genre_facet Alces alces
caribou
Rangifer tarandus
op_relation https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/5/226574.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/2/226574Suppl1.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/3/226574Suppl2.pdf
https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/226574/4/226574Suppl3.pdf
Morrison, T. A. et al. (2021) Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates. Journal of Animal Ecology <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Journal_of_Animal_Ecology.html>, 90(4), pp. 955-966. (doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13425 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13425>) (PMID:33481254)
op_rights cc_by_4
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13425
container_title Journal of Animal Ecology
container_volume 90
container_issue 4
container_start_page 955
op_container_end_page 966
_version_ 1766259376703668224