Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua

Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3 propanediol) is a broad spectrum bactericide that is the active ingredient of Pyceze®. To assess the potential of Pyceze® for use in marine fish hatcheries we have determined the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of bronopol for 13 bacteria isolated from eggs of ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aquaculture
Main Authors: Birkbeck, T. Harry, Reid, Helen I., Darde, Beatrice, Grant, Andrew W.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Elsevier 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/20393/
id ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:20393
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:20393 2023-05-15T15:27:37+02:00 Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua Birkbeck, T. Harry Reid, Helen I. Darde, Beatrice Grant, Andrew W. 2006-04-28 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/20393/ unknown Elsevier Birkbeck, T. H. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/12417.html>, Reid, H. I. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/32571.html>, Darde, B. and Grant, A. W. (2006) Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua. Aquaculture <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Aquaculture.html>, 254(1-4), pp. 125-128. (doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025>) Articles PeerReviewed 2006 ftuglasgow https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025 2021-09-23T22:14:59Z Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3 propanediol) is a broad spectrum bactericide that is the active ingredient of Pyceze®. To assess the potential of Pyceze® for use in marine fish hatcheries we have determined the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of bronopol for 13 bacteria isolated from eggs of halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), and Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio anguillarum as control bacteria. Six Vibrio and Moritella spp. had MIC ranging from 1–2 to 8 μg ml− 1 bronopol (mean MIC approximately 3 μg ml− 1), but other bacteria tested (Tenacibacter ovolyticus, Pseudomonas sp., Pseudoalteromonas spp., Colwellia sp., Photobacterium phosphoreum and a Cytophaga/Flexibacter sp.) were more resistant with MIC in the range 8–16 to 32–64 (mean MIC approximately 25 μg ml− 1). E. coli and S. aureus both had MIC of 32 μg ml− 1. Although the MIC of bronopol for T. ovolyticus was 16–32 μg ml− 1, a concentration of 100 μg ml− 1 bronopol had no detectable killing effect on this organism within 1 h but at 200 μg ml− 1 bronopol 90% of T. ovolyticus were killed within 30 min and > 99.99% within 2 h. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Gadus morhua University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications Aquaculture 254 1-4 125 128
institution Open Polar
collection University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications
op_collection_id ftuglasgow
language unknown
description Bronopol (2-bromo-2-nitro-1,3 propanediol) is a broad spectrum bactericide that is the active ingredient of Pyceze®. To assess the potential of Pyceze® for use in marine fish hatcheries we have determined the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of bronopol for 13 bacteria isolated from eggs of halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), and Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Vibrio anguillarum as control bacteria. Six Vibrio and Moritella spp. had MIC ranging from 1–2 to 8 μg ml− 1 bronopol (mean MIC approximately 3 μg ml− 1), but other bacteria tested (Tenacibacter ovolyticus, Pseudomonas sp., Pseudoalteromonas spp., Colwellia sp., Photobacterium phosphoreum and a Cytophaga/Flexibacter sp.) were more resistant with MIC in the range 8–16 to 32–64 (mean MIC approximately 25 μg ml− 1). E. coli and S. aureus both had MIC of 32 μg ml− 1. Although the MIC of bronopol for T. ovolyticus was 16–32 μg ml− 1, a concentration of 100 μg ml− 1 bronopol had no detectable killing effect on this organism within 1 h but at 200 μg ml− 1 bronopol 90% of T. ovolyticus were killed within 30 min and > 99.99% within 2 h.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Birkbeck, T. Harry
Reid, Helen I.
Darde, Beatrice
Grant, Andrew W.
spellingShingle Birkbeck, T. Harry
Reid, Helen I.
Darde, Beatrice
Grant, Andrew W.
Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
author_facet Birkbeck, T. Harry
Reid, Helen I.
Darde, Beatrice
Grant, Andrew W.
author_sort Birkbeck, T. Harry
title Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
title_short Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
title_full Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
title_fullStr Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
title_full_unstemmed Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua
title_sort activity of bronopol (pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, gadus morhua
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2006
url http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/20393/
genre atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
genre_facet atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
op_relation Birkbeck, T. H. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/12417.html>, Reid, H. I. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/32571.html>, Darde, B. and Grant, A. W. (2006) Activity of bronopol (Pyceze®) against bacteria cultured from eggs of halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus and cod, Gadus morhua. Aquaculture <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Aquaculture.html>, 254(1-4), pp. 125-128. (doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025>)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.025
container_title Aquaculture
container_volume 254
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 125
op_container_end_page 128
_version_ 1766358034523619328