Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations
Citizens increasingly obtained the opportunity of consultation and input during the constitutional reform. The variety of these consultation processes leads to several inter-connected question: How did these consultation processes work? What are the effects of these deliberative processes in compara...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | , |
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
ECPR Press
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/145100/ http://press.ecpr.eu/book_details.asp?bookTitleID=395 |
id |
ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:145100 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:145100 2023-05-15T16:49:02+02:00 Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations Geissel, Brigitte Gherghina, Sergiu Reuchamps, Min Suiter, Jane 2016 http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/145100/ http://press.ecpr.eu/book_details.asp?bookTitleID=395 unknown ECPR Press Geissel, B. and Gherghina, S. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/37306.html> (2016) Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations. In: Reuchamps, M. and Suiter, J. (eds.) Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Series: Studies in European political science. ECPR Press: Colchester, pp. 75-92. ISBN 9781785521454 Book Sections NonPeerReviewed 2016 ftuglasgow 2020-01-10T01:26:42Z Citizens increasingly obtained the opportunity of consultation and input during the constitutional reform. The variety of these consultation processes leads to several inter-connected question: How did these consultation processes work? What are the effects of these deliberative processes in comparative perspective? Do these effects match with findings on participatory innovations in general? This chapter seeks to provide some answers by embedding constitution reforms through popular involvement in the broader topic of democratic innovations. We start with a discussion of frameworks for the analysis and explain our decision to suggest a new framework. Then we comparatively evaluate the three case studies on constitutional deliberative procedures (Belgium, Iceland, Ireland) referring to input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy and output legitimacy. Finally, we embed the findings into the debate about the effects of democratic innovations in general. Book Part Iceland University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications |
op_collection_id |
ftuglasgow |
language |
unknown |
description |
Citizens increasingly obtained the opportunity of consultation and input during the constitutional reform. The variety of these consultation processes leads to several inter-connected question: How did these consultation processes work? What are the effects of these deliberative processes in comparative perspective? Do these effects match with findings on participatory innovations in general? This chapter seeks to provide some answers by embedding constitution reforms through popular involvement in the broader topic of democratic innovations. We start with a discussion of frameworks for the analysis and explain our decision to suggest a new framework. Then we comparatively evaluate the three case studies on constitutional deliberative procedures (Belgium, Iceland, Ireland) referring to input legitimacy, throughput legitimacy and output legitimacy. Finally, we embed the findings into the debate about the effects of democratic innovations in general. |
author2 |
Reuchamps, Min Suiter, Jane |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Geissel, Brigitte Gherghina, Sergiu |
spellingShingle |
Geissel, Brigitte Gherghina, Sergiu Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
author_facet |
Geissel, Brigitte Gherghina, Sergiu |
author_sort |
Geissel, Brigitte |
title |
Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
title_short |
Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
title_full |
Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
title_fullStr |
Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
title_sort |
constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations |
publisher |
ECPR Press |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/145100/ http://press.ecpr.eu/book_details.asp?bookTitleID=395 |
genre |
Iceland |
genre_facet |
Iceland |
op_relation |
Geissel, B. and Gherghina, S. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/37306.html> (2016) Constitutional deliberative democracy and democratic innovations. In: Reuchamps, M. and Suiter, J. (eds.) Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Series: Studies in European political science. ECPR Press: Colchester, pp. 75-92. ISBN 9781785521454 |
_version_ |
1766039101002219520 |