Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds

Capsule: Morphologically similar sympatrically breeding species differ in diet and foraging strategies, which could explain interspecific variation in breeding success and reproductive output. Aims: To compare provisioning rate and diet of nestling Arctic (Sterna paradisaea) and Common Terns (Sterna...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bird Study
Main Authors: Robertson, Gail S., Bolton, Mark, Monaghan, Pat
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: British Trust for Ornithology 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/130162/
id ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:130162
record_format openpolar
spelling ftuglasgow:oai:eprints.gla.ac.uk:130162 2023-05-15T14:44:37+02:00 Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds Robertson, Gail S. Bolton, Mark Monaghan, Pat 2016-05-13 https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/130162/ unknown British Trust for Ornithology Robertson, G. S., Bolton, M. and Monaghan, P. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/10154.html> (2016) Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds. Bird Study <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Bird_Study.html>, 63(3), pp. 319-329. (doi:10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112>) Articles PeerReviewed 2016 ftuglasgow https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112 2022-09-22T22:13:15Z Capsule: Morphologically similar sympatrically breeding species differ in diet and foraging strategies, which could explain interspecific variation in breeding success and reproductive output. Aims: To compare provisioning rate and diet of nestling Arctic (Sterna paradisaea) and Common Terns (Sterna hirundo), and examine how variation in provisioning behaviour influences reproductive parameters. Methods: Arctic and Common Tern nests were observed from June to July 2011 on Coquet Island, northeast England. We compared chick provisioning rate, diet and energy delivery rate between species, and examined whether these parameters were associated with interspecific differences in chick growth and survival, and total number of chicks fledged. Results: Arctic Terns delivered higher percentages of smaller Sandeels (Ammodytes marinus) and juvenile fish to chicks than did Common Terns, which delivered comparatively high percentages of larger Sprats (Sprattus sprattus). Although chick growth rate and survival were not significantly different between species, Common Terns fledged more chicks than Arctic Terns due to a tendency for larger clutch sizes. Conclusion: Our study suggests that interspecific differences in diet and foraging strategies can support total reproductive output in morphologically similar species. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Common tern Sterna hirundo Sterna paradisaea University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications Arctic Bird Study 63 3 319 329
institution Open Polar
collection University of Glasgow: Enlighten - Publications
op_collection_id ftuglasgow
language unknown
description Capsule: Morphologically similar sympatrically breeding species differ in diet and foraging strategies, which could explain interspecific variation in breeding success and reproductive output. Aims: To compare provisioning rate and diet of nestling Arctic (Sterna paradisaea) and Common Terns (Sterna hirundo), and examine how variation in provisioning behaviour influences reproductive parameters. Methods: Arctic and Common Tern nests were observed from June to July 2011 on Coquet Island, northeast England. We compared chick provisioning rate, diet and energy delivery rate between species, and examined whether these parameters were associated with interspecific differences in chick growth and survival, and total number of chicks fledged. Results: Arctic Terns delivered higher percentages of smaller Sandeels (Ammodytes marinus) and juvenile fish to chicks than did Common Terns, which delivered comparatively high percentages of larger Sprats (Sprattus sprattus). Although chick growth rate and survival were not significantly different between species, Common Terns fledged more chicks than Arctic Terns due to a tendency for larger clutch sizes. Conclusion: Our study suggests that interspecific differences in diet and foraging strategies can support total reproductive output in morphologically similar species.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Robertson, Gail S.
Bolton, Mark
Monaghan, Pat
spellingShingle Robertson, Gail S.
Bolton, Mark
Monaghan, Pat
Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
author_facet Robertson, Gail S.
Bolton, Mark
Monaghan, Pat
author_sort Robertson, Gail S.
title Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
title_short Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
title_full Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
title_fullStr Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
title_full_unstemmed Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
title_sort influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds
publisher British Trust for Ornithology
publishDate 2016
url https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/130162/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Common tern
Sterna hirundo
Sterna paradisaea
genre_facet Arctic
Common tern
Sterna hirundo
Sterna paradisaea
op_relation Robertson, G. S., Bolton, M. and Monaghan, P. <http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/author/10154.html> (2016) Influence of diet and foraging strategy on reproductive success in two morphologically similar sympatric seabirds. Bird Study <https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/view/journal_volume/Bird_Study.html>, 63(3), pp. 319-329. (doi:10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112>)
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1183112
container_title Bird Study
container_volume 63
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
op_container_end_page 329
_version_ 1766316102042779648