Additive containing homo and heterolactic bacteria on the fermentation quality of maize silage - doi:10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i4.18833
This trial evaluated the addition of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. brevis and Enterococcus faecium combo additive against a control treatment. The silages were made in laboratory silos that were stored for 30, 60, 90 or 120 days before opening. We evaluated the chemical composition of the forage befor...
Published in: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | Portuguese English |
Published: |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eduemojs.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/18833 https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v35i4.18833 |
Summary: | This trial evaluated the addition of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. brevis and Enterococcus faecium combo additive against a control treatment. The silages were made in laboratory silos that were stored for 30, 60, 90 or 120 days before opening. We evaluated the chemical composition of the forage before and after ensiling and the fermentative losses of silages. The additive decreased (p < 0.01) effluent production (11.4 kg ton-1) compared to control silage (14.0 kg ton-1), but it increased (p < 0.01) the Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) from 45.6% and 24.5% to 47.0 and 25.1% for control and additive silages, respectively. The storage periods affected (p < 0.01) effluent production, Dry Matter Losses (DML), NDF, ADF and pH variables. Fermentative losses were very low because of the adequate characteristics of maize for ensilage. This trial evaluated the addition of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. brevis and Enterococcus faeciumcombo additive against a control treatment. The silages were made in laboratory silos that were stored for30, 60, 90 or 120 days before opening. We evaluated the chemical composition of the forage before andafter ensiling and the fermentative losses of silages. The additive decreased (p < 0.01) effluent production(11.4 kg ton-1) compared to control silage (14.0 kg ton-1), but it increased (p < 0.01) the Neutral DetergentFiber (NDF) and Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) from 45.6% and 24.5% to 47.0 and 25.1% for control andadditive silages, respectively. The storage periods affected (p < 0.01) effluent production, Dry MatterLosses (DML), NDF, ADF and pH variables. Fermentative losses were very low because of the adequatecharacteristics of maize for ensilage. |
---|