Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War

Antarctica was the last continent to be colonised, and Antarctic colonisation continues into the Twenty-first Century. Today, thousands of people live and work there at numerous national bases. This paper is part of an ongoing study of the colonial settlement of Antarctica, focusing on bases establi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stevens, Q, Collis, C
Other Authors: Nichols, D, Lehmann, G
Format: Report
Language:unknown
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/191718/
id ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:191718
record_format openpolar
spelling ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:191718 2023-05-15T13:46:10+02:00 Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War Stevens, Q Collis, C Nichols, D Lehmann, G 2004 http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/191718/ unknown In: Nichols, D and Lehmann, G, (eds.) The 21st Century City, Past / Present / Future: Proceedings from the 7th Australasian Urban History / Planning History Conference 2004. (pp. 72 - 95). (2004) Proceedings paper 2004 ftucl 2013-11-10T03:32:43Z Antarctica was the last continent to be colonised, and Antarctic colonisation continues into the Twenty-first Century. Today, thousands of people live and work there at numerous national bases. This paper is part of an ongoing study of the colonial settlement of Antarctica, focusing on bases established by Australia, New Zealand, the United States and the Soviet Union. It examines the historical development of the built form of Antarctic stations and the planning ideas which have shaped them, against a broader backdrop of geopolitical objectives. The performance of scientific activities and the establishment of permanently-staffed facilities were always means to display and justify national interests in Antarctica. By the 1950s, many nations were actively pursuing and contesting territorial claims on the continent. Knowledge about its valuable natural resources was growing. The 1959 Antarctic Treaty was signed to forestall both the enforcement of national rights and economic exploitation. Antarctica was set aside for wildlife and for scientific research. Nonetheless, in the climate of escalating tension between the world’s superpowers, Antarctica remained a battleground of national prowess, both scientific and political. The U.S. and U.S.S.R. invested millions in efforts to explore, utilise and tactically dominate the continent. Military resources were mobilised, and nuclear power was brought to the world’s most pristine environment. At the same time as both countries competed to conquer outer space and the Moon, ostensibly in the name of science and for the benefit of all humanity, they also sought to explore and dominate the equally-difficult south polar region. This battle for supremacy between the cold-war superpowers was primarily played out in the eastern hemisphere of Antarctica, particularly the 42% of the continent that is claimed by Australia, and the large adjacent sector claimed by New Zealand. These two nations, themselves former colonies, sought to further develop their own territorial ambitions in Antarctica by developing bases there. These ambitions could either be aided by the superpowers or eclipsed by them. Today, the four nations under study have ten permanently-staffed research stations in Antarctica. This paper examines in detail three examples of scientific colonies: Mawson, McMurdo and Mirnyy. The paper compares the planning approaches of nations serving distinctly different imperial agendas. It does so in part by reference to other colonial, territorial and scientific initiatives pursued by these nations within their own national borders, in particular science cities in the U.S.S.R. Report Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica University College London: UCL Discovery Antarctic New Zealand
institution Open Polar
collection University College London: UCL Discovery
op_collection_id ftucl
language unknown
description Antarctica was the last continent to be colonised, and Antarctic colonisation continues into the Twenty-first Century. Today, thousands of people live and work there at numerous national bases. This paper is part of an ongoing study of the colonial settlement of Antarctica, focusing on bases established by Australia, New Zealand, the United States and the Soviet Union. It examines the historical development of the built form of Antarctic stations and the planning ideas which have shaped them, against a broader backdrop of geopolitical objectives. The performance of scientific activities and the establishment of permanently-staffed facilities were always means to display and justify national interests in Antarctica. By the 1950s, many nations were actively pursuing and contesting territorial claims on the continent. Knowledge about its valuable natural resources was growing. The 1959 Antarctic Treaty was signed to forestall both the enforcement of national rights and economic exploitation. Antarctica was set aside for wildlife and for scientific research. Nonetheless, in the climate of escalating tension between the world’s superpowers, Antarctica remained a battleground of national prowess, both scientific and political. The U.S. and U.S.S.R. invested millions in efforts to explore, utilise and tactically dominate the continent. Military resources were mobilised, and nuclear power was brought to the world’s most pristine environment. At the same time as both countries competed to conquer outer space and the Moon, ostensibly in the name of science and for the benefit of all humanity, they also sought to explore and dominate the equally-difficult south polar region. This battle for supremacy between the cold-war superpowers was primarily played out in the eastern hemisphere of Antarctica, particularly the 42% of the continent that is claimed by Australia, and the large adjacent sector claimed by New Zealand. These two nations, themselves former colonies, sought to further develop their own territorial ambitions in Antarctica by developing bases there. These ambitions could either be aided by the superpowers or eclipsed by them. Today, the four nations under study have ten permanently-staffed research stations in Antarctica. This paper examines in detail three examples of scientific colonies: Mawson, McMurdo and Mirnyy. The paper compares the planning approaches of nations serving distinctly different imperial agendas. It does so in part by reference to other colonial, territorial and scientific initiatives pursued by these nations within their own national borders, in particular science cities in the U.S.S.R.
author2 Nichols, D
Lehmann, G
format Report
author Stevens, Q
Collis, C
spellingShingle Stevens, Q
Collis, C
Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
author_facet Stevens, Q
Collis, C
author_sort Stevens, Q
title Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
title_short Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
title_full Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
title_fullStr Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
title_full_unstemmed Modern Colonialism in Antarctica: The Coldest Battlefield of the Cold War
title_sort modern colonialism in antarctica: the coldest battlefield of the cold war
publishDate 2004
url http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/191718/
geographic Antarctic
New Zealand
geographic_facet Antarctic
New Zealand
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
op_source In: Nichols, D and Lehmann, G, (eds.) The 21st Century City, Past / Present / Future: Proceedings from the 7th Australasian Urban History / Planning History Conference 2004. (pp. 72 - 95). (2004)
_version_ 1766237986940256256