U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India

The sediments deposited on the northern margin of Greater India during the Paleocene allow the timing of collision with the Spontang Ophiolite, the oceanic Kohistan-Dras Arc and Eurasia to be constrained. U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains from the Danian (61-65. Ma) Stumpata Formation shows a pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clift, PD, Jonell, TN, Carter, A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1425633/
id ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:1425633
record_format openpolar
spelling ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:1425633 2023-05-15T13:48:37+02:00 U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India Clift, PD Jonell, TN Carter, A 2014-03-15 http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1425633/ unknown Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , 82 80 - 89. (2014) Article 2014 ftucl 2014-04-03T23:02:28Z The sediments deposited on the northern margin of Greater India during the Paleocene allow the timing of collision with the Spontang Ophiolite, the oceanic Kohistan-Dras Arc and Eurasia to be constrained. U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains from the Danian (61-65. Ma) Stumpata Formation shows a provenance that is typical of the Tethyan Himalaya, but with a significant population of grains from 129. ±. 7. Ma also accounting for ~15% of the total, similar to the synchronous Jidula Formation of south central Tibet. Derivation of these grains from north of the Indus Suture can be ruled out, precluding India's collision with either Eurasia or the Kohistan-Dras before 61. Ma. Despite the immediate superposition of the Spontang Ophiolite, there are no grains in the Stumpata Formation consistent with erosion from this unit. Either Spontang obduction is younger than previously proposed, or the ophiolite remained submerged and/or uneroded until into the Eocene. The Mesozoic grains correlate well with the timing of ~130. Ma volcanism in central Tibet, suggesting that this phase of activity is linked to extension across the whole margin of northern India linked to the separation of India from Australia and Antarctica at that time. Mesozoic zircons in younger sedimentary rocks in Tibet suggest a rapid change in provenance, with strong erosion from within or north of the suture zone starting in the Early Eocene following collision. We find no evidence for strongly diachronous collision from central Tibet to the western Himalaya. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica University College London: UCL Discovery
institution Open Polar
collection University College London: UCL Discovery
op_collection_id ftucl
language unknown
description The sediments deposited on the northern margin of Greater India during the Paleocene allow the timing of collision with the Spontang Ophiolite, the oceanic Kohistan-Dras Arc and Eurasia to be constrained. U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains from the Danian (61-65. Ma) Stumpata Formation shows a provenance that is typical of the Tethyan Himalaya, but with a significant population of grains from 129. ±. 7. Ma also accounting for ~15% of the total, similar to the synchronous Jidula Formation of south central Tibet. Derivation of these grains from north of the Indus Suture can be ruled out, precluding India's collision with either Eurasia or the Kohistan-Dras before 61. Ma. Despite the immediate superposition of the Spontang Ophiolite, there are no grains in the Stumpata Formation consistent with erosion from this unit. Either Spontang obduction is younger than previously proposed, or the ophiolite remained submerged and/or uneroded until into the Eocene. The Mesozoic grains correlate well with the timing of ~130. Ma volcanism in central Tibet, suggesting that this phase of activity is linked to extension across the whole margin of northern India linked to the separation of India from Australia and Antarctica at that time. Mesozoic zircons in younger sedimentary rocks in Tibet suggest a rapid change in provenance, with strong erosion from within or north of the suture zone starting in the Early Eocene following collision. We find no evidence for strongly diachronous collision from central Tibet to the western Himalaya. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Clift, PD
Jonell, TN
Carter, A
spellingShingle Clift, PD
Jonell, TN
Carter, A
U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
author_facet Clift, PD
Jonell, TN
Carter, A
author_sort Clift, PD
title U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
title_short U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
title_full U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
title_fullStr U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
title_full_unstemmed U-Pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the Paleocene Stumpata Formation, Tethyan Himalaya, Zanskar, India
title_sort u-pb dating of detrital zircon grains in the paleocene stumpata formation, tethyan himalaya, zanskar, india
publishDate 2014
url http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1425633/
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , 82 80 - 89. (2014)
_version_ 1766249518424129536