The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent

The accuracy of two widely used digital elevation models of Antarctica was assessed using data from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System onboard ICESat. The digital elevation models were derived from satellite radar altimeter and terrestrial data sets. The first, termed JLB97, was produced predomin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bamber, J, Gomez-Dans, JL
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/113781/
id ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:113781
record_format openpolar
spelling ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:113781 2023-05-15T13:36:38+02:00 The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent Bamber, J Gomez-Dans, JL 2005-09-15 http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/113781/ unknown ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV EARTH PLANET SC LETT , 237 (3-4) 516 - 523. (2005) Antarctica digital elevation model satellite altimetry ICESat ALTIMETER DATA MASS-BALANCE ICE SHEETS POLAR ICE GREENLAND Article 2005 ftucl 2016-01-15T02:50:34Z The accuracy of two widely used digital elevation models of Antarctica was assessed using data from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System onboard ICESat. The digital elevation models were derived from satellite radar altimeter and terrestrial data sets. The first, termed JLB97, was produced predominantly from ERS-1 data while the second, termed, RAMPv2 included other sources of data in areas of high relief and poor coverage by ERS-1. The accuracy of the models was examined as a function of surface slope and original data source. Large errors, in excess of 100 m, were ubiquitous in both models in areas where terrestrially-derived elevation data had been used but were more extensive in RAMPv2. Elsewhere, the systematic error (bias) was found to be a monotonic function of slope for JL1397, with a more complex, less predictable bias for RAMPv2. The magnitude of the global, slope-dependent, bias ranged from less than a metre to slightly over 10 m but with much larger regional deviations. The random error ranged from about 1 m to over 100 m depending on the DEM and slope. The random error was consistently over a factor two larger for RAMPv2 compared to JL1397. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Greenland University College London: UCL Discovery Antarctic Greenland The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection University College London: UCL Discovery
op_collection_id ftucl
language unknown
topic Antarctica
digital elevation model
satellite altimetry
ICESat
ALTIMETER DATA
MASS-BALANCE
ICE SHEETS
POLAR ICE
GREENLAND
spellingShingle Antarctica
digital elevation model
satellite altimetry
ICESat
ALTIMETER DATA
MASS-BALANCE
ICE SHEETS
POLAR ICE
GREENLAND
Bamber, J
Gomez-Dans, JL
The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
topic_facet Antarctica
digital elevation model
satellite altimetry
ICESat
ALTIMETER DATA
MASS-BALANCE
ICE SHEETS
POLAR ICE
GREENLAND
description The accuracy of two widely used digital elevation models of Antarctica was assessed using data from the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System onboard ICESat. The digital elevation models were derived from satellite radar altimeter and terrestrial data sets. The first, termed JLB97, was produced predominantly from ERS-1 data while the second, termed, RAMPv2 included other sources of data in areas of high relief and poor coverage by ERS-1. The accuracy of the models was examined as a function of surface slope and original data source. Large errors, in excess of 100 m, were ubiquitous in both models in areas where terrestrially-derived elevation data had been used but were more extensive in RAMPv2. Elsewhere, the systematic error (bias) was found to be a monotonic function of slope for JL1397, with a more complex, less predictable bias for RAMPv2. The magnitude of the global, slope-dependent, bias ranged from less than a metre to slightly over 10 m but with much larger regional deviations. The random error ranged from about 1 m to over 100 m depending on the DEM and slope. The random error was consistently over a factor two larger for RAMPv2 compared to JL1397. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Bamber, J
Gomez-Dans, JL
author_facet Bamber, J
Gomez-Dans, JL
author_sort Bamber, J
title The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
title_short The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
title_full The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
title_fullStr The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
title_full_unstemmed The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent
title_sort accuracy of digital elevation models of the antarctic continent
publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
publishDate 2005
url http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/113781/
geographic Antarctic
Greenland
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Greenland
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Greenland
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctica
Greenland
op_source EARTH PLANET SC LETT , 237 (3-4) 516 - 523. (2005)
_version_ 1766081971289587712