Under-Ice Light Field in the Western Arctic Ocean During Late Summer

• Main Authors: Veyssiere, Gaelle, Castellani, Giulia, Wilkinson, Jeremy, Karcher, Michael, Hayward, Alexander, Stroeve, Julienne C, Nicolaus, Marcel, Kim, Joo-Hong, Yang, Eun-Jin, Valcic, Lovro, Kauker, Frank, Khan, Alia L, Rogers, Indea, Jung, Jinyoung
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: FRONTIERS MEDIA SA 2022
• Subjects: Science & Technology; Physical Sciences; Geosciences; Multidisciplinary; Geology; transmittance; arctic; late summer; first-year ice; ice extinction coefficient; under-ice irradiance; SEA-ICE; OPTICAL-PROPERTIES; ALGAL PRODUCTION; PACK ICE; PHYTOPLANKTON; TRANSMISSION; BIOMASS; SNOW; VARIABILITY; REFLECTION; Arctic; Arctic Ocean; Chukchi Sea; Chukchi; Phytoplankton; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10145602/1/Stroeve_Under-Ice%20Light%20Field%20in%20the%20Western%20Arctic%20Ocean%20During%20Late%20Summer_VoR.pdf; https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10145602/

The Arctic is no longer a region dominated by thick multi-year ice (MYI), but by thinner, more dynamic, first-year-ice (FYI). This shift towards a seasonal ice cover has consequences for the under-ice light field, as sea-ice and its snow cover are a major factor influencing radiative transfer and thus, biological activity within- and under the ice. This work describes in situ measurements of light transmission through different types of sea-ice (MYI and FYI) performed during two expeditions to the Chukchi sea in August 2018 and 2019, as well as a simple characterisation of the biological state of the ice microbial system. Our analysis shows that, in late summer, two different states of FYI exist in this region: 1) FYI in an enhanced state of decay, and 2) robust FYI, more likely to survive the melt season. The two FYI types have different average ice thicknesses: 0.74 ± 0.07 m (N = 9) and 0.93 ± 0.11 m (N = 9), different average values of transmittance: 0.15 ± 0.04 compared to 0.09 ± 0.02, and different ice extinction coefficients: 1.49 ± 0.28 and 1.12 ± 0.19 m−1. The measurements performed over MYI present different characteristics with a higher average ice thickness of 1.56 ± 0.12 m, lower transmittance (0.05 ± 0.01) with ice extinction coefficients of 1.24 ± 0.26 m−1 (N = 12). All ice types show consistently low salinity, chlorophyll a concentrations and nutrients, which may be linked to the timing of the measurements and the flushing of melt-water through the ice. With continued Arctic warming, the summer ice will continue to retreat, and the decayed variant of FYI, with a higher scattering of light, but a reduced thickness, leading to an overall higher light transmittance, may become a more relevant ice type. Our results suggest that in this scenario, more light would reach the ice interior and the upper-ocean.