Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals

ESA's CryoSat‐2 has transformed the way we monitor Arctic sea ice, providing routine measurements of the ice thickness with near basin‐wide coverage. Past studies have shown that uncertainties in the sea ice thickness retrievals can be introduced at several steps of the processing chain, for in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Landy, JC, Petty, AA, Tsamados, M, Stroeve, JC
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/1/Stroeve_2019JC015820.pdf
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/
id ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:10095780
record_format openpolar
spelling ftucl:oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:10095780 2023-12-24T10:13:49+01:00 Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals Landy, JC Petty, AA Tsamados, M Stroeve, JC 2020-05 text https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/1/Stroeve_2019JC015820.pdf https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/ eng eng American Geophysical Union (AGU) https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/1/Stroeve_2019JC015820.pdf https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/ open Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , 125 (5) , Article e2019JC015820. (2020) Arctic Sea Ice CryoSat‐2 Roughness Ice Freeboard Numerical Modelling Article 2020 ftucl 2023-11-27T13:07:31Z ESA's CryoSat‐2 has transformed the way we monitor Arctic sea ice, providing routine measurements of the ice thickness with near basin‐wide coverage. Past studies have shown that uncertainties in the sea ice thickness retrievals can be introduced at several steps of the processing chain, for instance in the estimation of snow depth, and snow and sea ice densities. Here, we apply a new physical model to CryoSat‐2 which further reveals sea ice surface roughness as a key overlooked feature of the conventional retrieval process. High‐resolution airborne observations demonstrate that snow and sea ice surface topography can be better characterized by a Lognormal distribution, which varies based on the ice age and surface roughness within a CryoSat‐2 footprint, than a Gaussian distribution. Based on these observations, we perform a set of simulations for the CryoSat‐2 echo waveform over ‘virtual’ sea ice surfaces with a range of roughness and radar backscattering configurations. By accounting for the variable roughness, our new Lognormal retracker produces sea ice freeboards which compare well with those derived from NASA's Operation IceBridge airborne data and extends the capability of CryoSat‐2 to profile the thinnest/smoothest sea ice and thickest/roughest ice. Our results indicate that the variable ice surface roughness contributes a systematic uncertainty in sea ice thickness of up to 20% over first‐year ice and 30% over multi‐year ice, representing one of the principal sources of pan‐Arctic sea ice thickness uncertainty. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Sea ice University College London: UCL Discovery Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection University College London: UCL Discovery
op_collection_id ftucl
language English
topic Arctic
Sea Ice
CryoSat‐2
Roughness
Ice Freeboard
Numerical Modelling
spellingShingle Arctic
Sea Ice
CryoSat‐2
Roughness
Ice Freeboard
Numerical Modelling
Landy, JC
Petty, AA
Tsamados, M
Stroeve, JC
Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
topic_facet Arctic
Sea Ice
CryoSat‐2
Roughness
Ice Freeboard
Numerical Modelling
description ESA's CryoSat‐2 has transformed the way we monitor Arctic sea ice, providing routine measurements of the ice thickness with near basin‐wide coverage. Past studies have shown that uncertainties in the sea ice thickness retrievals can be introduced at several steps of the processing chain, for instance in the estimation of snow depth, and snow and sea ice densities. Here, we apply a new physical model to CryoSat‐2 which further reveals sea ice surface roughness as a key overlooked feature of the conventional retrieval process. High‐resolution airborne observations demonstrate that snow and sea ice surface topography can be better characterized by a Lognormal distribution, which varies based on the ice age and surface roughness within a CryoSat‐2 footprint, than a Gaussian distribution. Based on these observations, we perform a set of simulations for the CryoSat‐2 echo waveform over ‘virtual’ sea ice surfaces with a range of roughness and radar backscattering configurations. By accounting for the variable roughness, our new Lognormal retracker produces sea ice freeboards which compare well with those derived from NASA's Operation IceBridge airborne data and extends the capability of CryoSat‐2 to profile the thinnest/smoothest sea ice and thickest/roughest ice. Our results indicate that the variable ice surface roughness contributes a systematic uncertainty in sea ice thickness of up to 20% over first‐year ice and 30% over multi‐year ice, representing one of the principal sources of pan‐Arctic sea ice thickness uncertainty.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Landy, JC
Petty, AA
Tsamados, M
Stroeve, JC
author_facet Landy, JC
Petty, AA
Tsamados, M
Stroeve, JC
author_sort Landy, JC
title Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
title_short Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
title_full Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
title_fullStr Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
title_full_unstemmed Sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in CryoSat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
title_sort sea ice roughness overlooked as a key source of uncertainty in cryosat‐2 ice freeboard retrievals
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
publishDate 2020
url https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/1/Stroeve_2019JC015820.pdf
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_source Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans , 125 (5) , Article e2019JC015820. (2020)
op_relation https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/1/Stroeve_2019JC015820.pdf
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10095780/
op_rights open
_version_ 1786186257658806272