The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families

An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act) came into force in January of 2020, containing many innovative provisions aimed at affirming the jurisdiction of Indigenous peoples and providing services for Indigenous families. Ground- breaking provisions wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garrett, Rachel
Format: Text
Language:unknown
Published: Allard Research Commons 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/can-j-fam-l/vol34/iss1/3
https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=can-j-fam-l
id ftubritcolallard:oai:commons.allard.ubc.ca:can-j-fam-l-1090
record_format openpolar
spelling ftubritcolallard:oai:commons.allard.ubc.ca:can-j-fam-l-1090 2023-05-15T16:15:56+02:00 The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families Garrett, Rachel 2021-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/can-j-fam-l/vol34/iss1/3 https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=can-j-fam-l unknown Allard Research Commons https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/can-j-fam-l/vol34/iss1/3 https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=can-j-fam-l Canadian Journal of Family Law Family Law Law and Society text 2021 ftubritcolallard 2022-01-30T16:35:49Z An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act) came into force in January of 2020, containing many innovative provisions aimed at affirming the jurisdiction of Indigenous peoples and providing services for Indigenous families. Ground- breaking provisions within the Act create a positive obligation on the government to provide services to Indigenous children who otherwise would have been apprehended due to their socioeconomic status. However, the Act lacks a concrete funding provision. This legislative comment conducts an exercise in statutory interpretation to conclude that the current omission of a funding provision within the legislation is at odds with the nature, purposes, and context of the legislation. The Act leaves a gap in funding (through no fault of the child’s community) for children living in communities that have assumed jurisdiction over their own child and family services without having signed a coordination agreement, as well as for children in communities that have not assumed jurisdiction. This gap results in an inequitable funding distribution that helps some children out of poverty while leaving others behind, based on characteristics entirely out of the child’s control. Knowledge of this dangerous gap is crucial in compelling legal actors to urgently push for legal solutions, so that no child is denied the protections offered in sections 15 and 15.1 of the Act. Text First Nations inuit Allard Research Commons (Peter A. Allard School of Law)
institution Open Polar
collection Allard Research Commons (Peter A. Allard School of Law)
op_collection_id ftubritcolallard
language unknown
topic Family Law
Law and Society
spellingShingle Family Law
Law and Society
Garrett, Rachel
The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
topic_facet Family Law
Law and Society
description An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families (the Act) came into force in January of 2020, containing many innovative provisions aimed at affirming the jurisdiction of Indigenous peoples and providing services for Indigenous families. Ground- breaking provisions within the Act create a positive obligation on the government to provide services to Indigenous children who otherwise would have been apprehended due to their socioeconomic status. However, the Act lacks a concrete funding provision. This legislative comment conducts an exercise in statutory interpretation to conclude that the current omission of a funding provision within the legislation is at odds with the nature, purposes, and context of the legislation. The Act leaves a gap in funding (through no fault of the child’s community) for children living in communities that have assumed jurisdiction over their own child and family services without having signed a coordination agreement, as well as for children in communities that have not assumed jurisdiction. This gap results in an inequitable funding distribution that helps some children out of poverty while leaving others behind, based on characteristics entirely out of the child’s control. Knowledge of this dangerous gap is crucial in compelling legal actors to urgently push for legal solutions, so that no child is denied the protections offered in sections 15 and 15.1 of the Act.
format Text
author Garrett, Rachel
author_facet Garrett, Rachel
author_sort Garrett, Rachel
title The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
title_short The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
title_full The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
title_fullStr The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
title_full_unstemmed The Children Parliament Left Behind: Examining the Inequity of Funding in An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families
title_sort children parliament left behind: examining the inequity of funding in an act respecting first nations, inuit and métis children, youth and families
publisher Allard Research Commons
publishDate 2021
url https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/can-j-fam-l/vol34/iss1/3
https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=can-j-fam-l
genre First Nations
inuit
genre_facet First Nations
inuit
op_source Canadian Journal of Family Law
op_relation https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/can-j-fam-l/vol34/iss1/3
https://commons.allard.ubc.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1090&context=can-j-fam-l
_version_ 1766001801344057344