A Blind Expert Test of Contrarian Claims about Climate Data

Although virtually all experts agree that CO 2 emissions are causing anthropogenic global warming, public discourse is replete with contrarian claims that either deny that global warming is happening or dispute a human influence. Although the rejection of climate science is known to be driven by ide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global Environmental Change
Main Authors: Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ballard, Tim, Oberauer, Klaus, Benestad, Rasmus E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/psyc_memory
Memory
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog
TeDCog
Climate change
Climate change denial
Public discourse about climate change
Arctic
Global warming
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1983/80c3456a-fdcc-4a73-a527-522b65221a48
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/80c3456a-fdcc-4a73-a527-522b65221a48
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.013
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/72163897/GECLskyetalInpress.pdf
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/75190184/LskyGECBlindTestOSM.pdf
https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/17ejywebeb6kk19odghem68one
https://data.bris.ac.uk/data/dataset/7aeind9zcl461l5hm8dju0v05
Description
Summary:Although virtually all experts agree that CO 2 emissions are causing anthropogenic global warming, public discourse is replete with contrarian claims that either deny that global warming is happening or dispute a human influence. Although the rejection of climate science is known to be driven by ideological, psychological, and political factors rather than scientific disagreement, contrarian views have considerable prominence in the media. A better understanding of contrarian discourse is therefore called for. We report a blind expert test of contrarian claims about climatological variables. Expert economists and statisticians were presented with representative contrarian statements (e.g., “Arctic ice is recovering”) translated into an economic or demographic context. In that blind test, contrarian claims were found to be misleading. By contrast, mainstream scientific interpretations of the data were judged to be accurate and policy relevant. The results imply that media inclusion of contrarian statements may increase bias rather than balance.

Similar Items