Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics

At least in conventional hydrostatic ice-sheet models, the numerical error associated with grounding line dynamics can be reduced by modifications to the discretization scheme. These involve altering the integration formulae for the basal traction and/or driving stress close to the grounding line an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of Glaciology
Main Authors: Cornford, Stephen, Martin, Daniel, Lee, Victoria, Payne, Tony, Ng, Esmond
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1983/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/106879872/div_class_title_adaptive_mesh_refinement_versus_subgrid_friction_interpolation_in_simulations_of_antarctic_ice_dynamics_div.pdf
id ftubristolcris:oai:research-information.bris.ac.uk:publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftubristolcris:oai:research-information.bris.ac.uk:publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1 2024-04-28T07:55:30+00:00 Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics Cornford, Stephen Martin, Daniel Lee, Victoria Payne, Tony Ng, Esmond 2016-09 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1983/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1 https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1 https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13 https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/106879872/div_class_title_adaptive_mesh_refinement_versus_subgrid_friction_interpolation_in_simulations_of_antarctic_ice_dynamics_div.pdf eng eng https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Cornford , S , Martin , D , Lee , V , Payne , T & Ng , E 2016 , ' Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics ' , Annals of Glaciology , vol. 57 , no. 73 , pp. 1-9 . https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13 article 2016 ftubristolcris https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13 2024-04-03T15:33:35Z At least in conventional hydrostatic ice-sheet models, the numerical error associated with grounding line dynamics can be reduced by modifications to the discretization scheme. These involve altering the integration formulae for the basal traction and/or driving stress close to the grounding line and exhibit lower – if still first-order – error in the MISMIP3d experiments. MISMIP3d may not represent the variety of real ice streams, in that it lacks strong lateral stresses, and imposes a large basal traction at the grounding line. We study resolution sensitivity in the context of extreme forcing simulations of the entire Antarctic ice sheet, using the BISICLES adaptive mesh ice-sheet model with two schemes: the original treatment, and a scheme, which modifies the discretization of the basal traction. The second scheme does indeed improve accuracy – by around a factor of two – for a given mesh spacing, but $\lesssim 1$ km resolution is still necessary. For example, in coarser resolution simulations Thwaites Glacier retreats so slowly that other ice streams divert its trunk. In contrast, with $\lesssim 1$ km meshes, the same glacier retreats far more quickly and triggers the final phase of West Antarctic collapse a century before any such diversion can take place. Article in Journal/Newspaper Annals of Glaciology Antarc* Antarctic Ice Sheet Thwaites Glacier University of Bristol: Bristol Research Annals of Glaciology 57 73 1 9
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bristol: Bristol Research
op_collection_id ftubristolcris
language English
description At least in conventional hydrostatic ice-sheet models, the numerical error associated with grounding line dynamics can be reduced by modifications to the discretization scheme. These involve altering the integration formulae for the basal traction and/or driving stress close to the grounding line and exhibit lower – if still first-order – error in the MISMIP3d experiments. MISMIP3d may not represent the variety of real ice streams, in that it lacks strong lateral stresses, and imposes a large basal traction at the grounding line. We study resolution sensitivity in the context of extreme forcing simulations of the entire Antarctic ice sheet, using the BISICLES adaptive mesh ice-sheet model with two schemes: the original treatment, and a scheme, which modifies the discretization of the basal traction. The second scheme does indeed improve accuracy – by around a factor of two – for a given mesh spacing, but $\lesssim 1$ km resolution is still necessary. For example, in coarser resolution simulations Thwaites Glacier retreats so slowly that other ice streams divert its trunk. In contrast, with $\lesssim 1$ km meshes, the same glacier retreats far more quickly and triggers the final phase of West Antarctic collapse a century before any such diversion can take place.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cornford, Stephen
Martin, Daniel
Lee, Victoria
Payne, Tony
Ng, Esmond
spellingShingle Cornford, Stephen
Martin, Daniel
Lee, Victoria
Payne, Tony
Ng, Esmond
Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
author_facet Cornford, Stephen
Martin, Daniel
Lee, Victoria
Payne, Tony
Ng, Esmond
author_sort Cornford, Stephen
title Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
title_short Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
title_full Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
title_fullStr Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
title_sort adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of antarctic ice dynamics
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/1983/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/106879872/div_class_title_adaptive_mesh_refinement_versus_subgrid_friction_interpolation_in_simulations_of_antarctic_ice_dynamics_div.pdf
genre Annals of Glaciology
Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Thwaites Glacier
genre_facet Annals of Glaciology
Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice Sheet
Thwaites Glacier
op_source Cornford , S , Martin , D , Lee , V , Payne , T & Ng , E 2016 , ' Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics ' , Annals of Glaciology , vol. 57 , no. 73 , pp. 1-9 . https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13
op_relation https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/527ddf2d-66dd-434e-97b4-98da87fbf7b1
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1017/aog.2016.13
container_title Annals of Glaciology
container_volume 57
container_issue 73
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 9
_version_ 1797580201089040384