Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial

Changes in temperature and carbon dioxide during glacial cycles recorded in Antarctic ice cores are tightly coupled. However, this relationship does not hold for interglacials. While climate cooled towards the end of both the last (Eemian) and present (Holocene) interglacials, CO 2 remained stable d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quaternary Science Reviews
Main Authors: Brovkin, Victor, Brücher, Tim, Kleinen, Thomas, Zaehle, Sonke, Joos, Fortunat, Roth, Raphael, Spahni, Renato, Schmitt, Jochen, Fischer, Hubertus, Leuenberger, Markus, Stone, Emma J, Ridgwell, Andy J, Chappellaz, Jerome, Kehrwald, Natalie, Barbante, Carlo, Blunier, Thomas, Dahl Jensen, Dorthe
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/1983/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/66546068/1_s2.0_S0277379116300300_main.pdf
id ftubristolcris:oai:research-information.bris.ac.uk:publications/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74
record_format openpolar
spelling ftubristolcris:oai:research-information.bris.ac.uk:publications/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74 2024-01-28T09:59:59+01:00 Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial Brovkin, Victor Brücher, Tim Kleinen, Thomas Zaehle, Sonke Joos, Fortunat Roth, Raphael Spahni, Renato Schmitt, Jochen Fischer, Hubertus Leuenberger, Markus Stone, Emma J Ridgwell, Andy J Chappellaz, Jerome Kehrwald, Natalie Barbante, Carlo Blunier, Thomas Dahl Jensen, Dorthe 2016-04-01 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/1983/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74 https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028 https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/66546068/1_s2.0_S0277379116300300_main.pdf eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Brovkin , V , Brücher , T , Kleinen , T , Zaehle , S , Joos , F , Roth , R , Spahni , R , Schmitt , J , Fischer , H , Leuenberger , M , Stone , E J , Ridgwell , A J , Chappellaz , J , Kehrwald , N , Barbante , C , Blunier , T & Dahl Jensen , D 2016 , ' Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial ' , Quaternary Science Reviews , vol. 137 , pp. 15-32 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028 Carbon cycle Climate Models Interglacials The Holocene The Eemian Peatland Fire Coral reef article 2016 ftubristolcris https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028 2024-01-04T23:48:13Z Changes in temperature and carbon dioxide during glacial cycles recorded in Antarctic ice cores are tightly coupled. However, this relationship does not hold for interglacials. While climate cooled towards the end of both the last (Eemian) and present (Holocene) interglacials, CO 2 remained stable during the Eemian while rising in the Holocene. We identify and review twelve biogeochemical mechanisms of terrestrial (vegetation dynamics and CO 2 fertilization, land use, wildfire, accumulation of peat, changes in permafrost carbon, subaerial volcanic outgassing) and marine origin (changes in sea surface temperature, carbonate compensation to deglaciation and terrestrial biosphere regrowth, shallow-water carbonate sedimentation, changes in the soft tissue pump, and methane hydrates), which potentially may have contributed to the CO 2 dynamics during interglacials but which remain not well quantified. We use three Earth System Models (ESMs) of intermediate complexity to compare effects of selected mechanisms on the interglacial CO 2 and δ 13 CO 2 changes, focusing on those with substantial potential impacts: namely carbonate sedimentation in shallow waters, peat growth, and (in the case of the Holocene) human land use. A set of specified carbon cycle forcings could qualitatively explain atmospheric CO 2 dynamics from 8 ka BP to the pre-industrial. However, when applied to Eemian boundary conditions from 126 to 115 ka BP, the same set of forcings led to disagreement with the observed direction of CO 2 changes after 122 ka BP. This failure to simulate late-Eemian CO 2 dynamics could be a result of the imposed forcings such as prescribed CaCO 3 accumulation and/or an incorrect response of simulated terrestrial carbon to the surface cooling at the end of the interglacial. These experiments also reveal that key natural processes of interglacial CO 2 dynamics – shallow water CaCO 3 accumulation, peat and permafrost carbon dynamics - are not well represented in the current ESMs. Global-scale modeling of these long-term ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Ice permafrost University of Bristol: Bristol Research Antarctic Quaternary Science Reviews 137 15 32
institution Open Polar
collection University of Bristol: Bristol Research
op_collection_id ftubristolcris
language English
topic Carbon cycle
Climate
Models
Interglacials
The Holocene
The Eemian
Peatland
Fire
Coral reef
spellingShingle Carbon cycle
Climate
Models
Interglacials
The Holocene
The Eemian
Peatland
Fire
Coral reef
Brovkin, Victor
Brücher, Tim
Kleinen, Thomas
Zaehle, Sonke
Joos, Fortunat
Roth, Raphael
Spahni, Renato
Schmitt, Jochen
Fischer, Hubertus
Leuenberger, Markus
Stone, Emma J
Ridgwell, Andy J
Chappellaz, Jerome
Kehrwald, Natalie
Barbante, Carlo
Blunier, Thomas
Dahl Jensen, Dorthe
Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
topic_facet Carbon cycle
Climate
Models
Interglacials
The Holocene
The Eemian
Peatland
Fire
Coral reef
description Changes in temperature and carbon dioxide during glacial cycles recorded in Antarctic ice cores are tightly coupled. However, this relationship does not hold for interglacials. While climate cooled towards the end of both the last (Eemian) and present (Holocene) interglacials, CO 2 remained stable during the Eemian while rising in the Holocene. We identify and review twelve biogeochemical mechanisms of terrestrial (vegetation dynamics and CO 2 fertilization, land use, wildfire, accumulation of peat, changes in permafrost carbon, subaerial volcanic outgassing) and marine origin (changes in sea surface temperature, carbonate compensation to deglaciation and terrestrial biosphere regrowth, shallow-water carbonate sedimentation, changes in the soft tissue pump, and methane hydrates), which potentially may have contributed to the CO 2 dynamics during interglacials but which remain not well quantified. We use three Earth System Models (ESMs) of intermediate complexity to compare effects of selected mechanisms on the interglacial CO 2 and δ 13 CO 2 changes, focusing on those with substantial potential impacts: namely carbonate sedimentation in shallow waters, peat growth, and (in the case of the Holocene) human land use. A set of specified carbon cycle forcings could qualitatively explain atmospheric CO 2 dynamics from 8 ka BP to the pre-industrial. However, when applied to Eemian boundary conditions from 126 to 115 ka BP, the same set of forcings led to disagreement with the observed direction of CO 2 changes after 122 ka BP. This failure to simulate late-Eemian CO 2 dynamics could be a result of the imposed forcings such as prescribed CaCO 3 accumulation and/or an incorrect response of simulated terrestrial carbon to the surface cooling at the end of the interglacial. These experiments also reveal that key natural processes of interglacial CO 2 dynamics – shallow water CaCO 3 accumulation, peat and permafrost carbon dynamics - are not well represented in the current ESMs. Global-scale modeling of these long-term ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Brovkin, Victor
Brücher, Tim
Kleinen, Thomas
Zaehle, Sonke
Joos, Fortunat
Roth, Raphael
Spahni, Renato
Schmitt, Jochen
Fischer, Hubertus
Leuenberger, Markus
Stone, Emma J
Ridgwell, Andy J
Chappellaz, Jerome
Kehrwald, Natalie
Barbante, Carlo
Blunier, Thomas
Dahl Jensen, Dorthe
author_facet Brovkin, Victor
Brücher, Tim
Kleinen, Thomas
Zaehle, Sonke
Joos, Fortunat
Roth, Raphael
Spahni, Renato
Schmitt, Jochen
Fischer, Hubertus
Leuenberger, Markus
Stone, Emma J
Ridgwell, Andy J
Chappellaz, Jerome
Kehrwald, Natalie
Barbante, Carlo
Blunier, Thomas
Dahl Jensen, Dorthe
author_sort Brovkin, Victor
title Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
title_short Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
title_full Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
title_fullStr Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
title_sort comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial
publishDate 2016
url https://hdl.handle.net/1983/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/0e6c2588-c175-4515-8180-1568724fca74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/ws/files/66546068/1_s2.0_S0277379116300300_main.pdf
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice
permafrost
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Ice
permafrost
op_source Brovkin , V , Brücher , T , Kleinen , T , Zaehle , S , Joos , F , Roth , R , Spahni , R , Schmitt , J , Fischer , H , Leuenberger , M , Stone , E J , Ridgwell , A J , Chappellaz , J , Kehrwald , N , Barbante , C , Blunier , T & Dahl Jensen , D 2016 , ' Comparative carbon cycle dynamics of the present and last interglacial ' , Quaternary Science Reviews , vol. 137 , pp. 15-32 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.01.028
container_title Quaternary Science Reviews
container_volume 137
container_start_page 15
op_container_end_page 32
_version_ 1789340230464045056